It's really slow, and if it's still this low, it's so slow that I can't stand it

(0) 讚！ | 菜鸟还得练第二篇SCI

2024.3.26 Submission
2024.4.25 Major revision
2024.4.29 Peer review
No updates at the moment, no news
The other article submitted on 4.25 (Journal of materials science) has already been accepted after revisions, what's going on with this journal?

(0) 讚！ | 菜鸟还得练第二篇SCI

The journal is too slow. It's been two months after major revisions and still no news. The journal is really rubbish. Be cautious when submitting

(0) 讚！ | 哈雷了哈里哈哈

How is it going? How long until you hear back from the reviewers?

(0) 讚！ | 哈雷了哈里哈哈

It has been about half a month since I submitted my application, but it is still under review. It's too slow. Be cautious when submitting

(0) 讚！ | 哈雷了哈里哈哈

It's the same for me. I've been waiting for a month and a half for a review. It's too slow. Be cautious when submitting, as it's a waste of time

(0) 讚！ | 哈雷了哈里哈哈

We will now find the most suitable editor to manage the next steps of your submission. If your submission is successful, they will invite reviewers to peer review your work. This process can take a few weeks

(0) 讚！ | 哈雷了哈里哈哈

Well, okay, thank you very much!

(0) 讚！ | 牧啊

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and title them "English Translation:" and "Japanese Translation:"

(0) 讚！ | 做个混子

Hello, I would like to ask, once his journal's technical review is approved, does it mean it will be peer reviewed?

(0) 讚！ | 牧啊

8.9 Submitted
8.30 Received review comments
9.5 Revised
9.27 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | 做个混子

The speed is still very fast. It took two months from submission to acceptance, with two revisions in between. The comments from the reviewers and editors were very professional.

(0) 讚！ | seven Rega

Submission accepted 08 Aug 2023
Submission under peer review 07 Aug 2023
Submission passed technical check 07 Aug 2023
Revision received 07 Aug 2023
Submission under peer review 07 Jul 2023
Submission passed technical check 07 Jul 2023
Revision received 07 Jul 2023
Submission under peer review 30 May 2023
Submission passed technical check 30 May 2023
Submission is under technical check 29 May 2023
Submission received 29 May 2023

(0) 讚！ | seven Rega

It has been three weeks and it is still in the hands of the editor.

(0) 讚！ | seven Rega

It has been fifty days since I submitted, but there is still no news. What is going on?

(0) 讚！ | xiaxia

Hello, I would like to ask how to find the contact information of the editor? I have submitted my contribution for a month but have not received any information. I would like to seek some advice.

(0) 讚！ | xiaxia

I have already submitted my contribution in February, why is there no information at all?

(0) 讚！ | xiaxia

Waited for a long time, but the result is good, finally accepted.

(0) 讚！ | hhhhhxyz

Direct reception after major repairs on March 11th.

(0) 讚！ | 中辣中辣我中辣

12.31 Submission
1.23 Major repairs
2.15 Submission of revised draft
Wishing you good luck.

(0) 讚！ | 中辣中辣我中辣

I also submitted on October 24th, and until now it is still Editor Assignment Pending, are you also in the same situation?

(0) 讚！ | 小胡的南宫霸天

It has been ten days since submission and it has been continuously in the state of "Editor Assignment Pending". What is going on? Is this normal?

(1) 讚！ | 郝培燕

2021.4.12  Submission
2021.4.23  Major revision
2021.5.17  Submission of revised manuscript
2021.5.20  Minor revision
2021.5.31  Submission of revised manuscript
2021.6.8    Acceptance

There was only one reviewer, and the process was relatively fast. It took longer during the major revision as additional data was added for testing, otherwise it could have been even faster.

(0) 讚！ | 拖延症晚期

January 22nd submission
Received directly at 11:30 pm on February 26th
Two reviewers recommend direct acceptance, but one reviewer suggests increasing the font size by one in the abstract figure.
Reviewer 1: Therefore, this data is a relevant contribution to the literature and should be published in JSST.
Reviewer 2: From my point of view, those are very good results.

(0) 讚！ | CrisWu

One major revision, one rejection, and then sent for major revision to the third reviewer. Overall, the review process took three months, the revised version was returned for a second review after two months, and was accepted one month later. In total, it took 6-7 months. It's a bit long, but the reviewers and editors were very efficient. I hope the journal continues to improve.

(0) 讚！ | 皮卡丘&