I have been submitting for 6 months. The first 3 months were normal peer review, with 6 comments from the reviewers, which were relatively friendly. In the following 2 revisions, the reviewers asked me to contact a foreigner on their behalf and provided an email for me to directly polish the article, which cost me $500 (at this point, I suspected it was an internal scam). After submitting the revised version, there were no further comments, and I waited for 2 months. Suddenly, the editor said it was rejected, and the reason given was that the reviewers felt that I used the word "transfer" incorrectly and lacked clinical research. They suggested that I submit to a sister journal without impact factor. The problem is, how can the reviewers suggest another journal when this journal is a sister journal? The editor-in-chief is Dr. Bernard Lee.

(0) 讚！ | sdlka

In general, experiments are presented in the order in which the results appear

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

The general advice is to follow this order

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Is it necessary to write the order of methods according to the order of results?

(0) 讚！ | 破戒阳平

What is the writing sequence/logical sequence of the method?

(0) 讚！ | Oswald Edie

How much is the layout fee for this magazine?

(0) 讚！ | 百花安白

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 75.0
Experience sharing: The journal is generally good, with fast review speed and short publication cycle. I submitted two papers, one was accepted after minor revisions, and the other was accepted after major revisions. The language requirement is not very high

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Trash magazines, who cares, just submit and we'll see

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁