Have you got the result yet? How is the speed?

(0) 讚！ | mollyhola

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and use "English translation:" as the title

(0) 讚！ | Three哥哥·

It takes about a month to get hired, but another month is needed for proofreading, so the launch is a bit slow, it's like a monthly publication, so it's equivalent to two months

(2) 讚！ | 姓付的

06 Feb 2024 Editor Decision - Accept
05 Feb 2024 Author Revision
05 Feb 2024 AU - PDF Built
01 Feb 2024 Editor Decision - Minor Revision
28 Dec 2023 Submission Confirmation

(3) 讚！ | 姓付的

Hello! My submission shows as Editor Assigned on the second day after I submitted it on 12.4, is this normal? It has been over twenty days and it is still with the handling editor. Also, after I submitted it, I accidentally clicked on the flashlight icon with an "X" next to the action line on the second day, but the confirmation button did not pop up. I am not sure if it was clicked or not. Is this normal?

(1) 讚！ | 竹林听雪2

Submission in July 2023. 
Major revision in September 2023 (25 days), with around 80 questions from two reviewers. The review process was extremely thorough and diligent. 
Revised manuscript submitted in September 2023. 
Minor revision in October 2023 (10 days). 
Accepted after minor revision in October 2023

(4) 讚！ | 希茅

Basically, there will be results within one month after the first review. If it is a major revision, the editor will return it to the reviewer. If it is a minor revision, it is likely to be accepted directly after the modifications are made.

(0) 讚！ | 幕客卿、

Which partner has submitted this journal? Is the review period long?

(0) 讚！ | 开心的秋田

First submission + 1 month. Major revisions were done by one reviewer, who gave about 30 questions.
Major revisions took 20 days to return + 1 month. Minor revisions were made.
Minor revisions took 10 days to return, and were received the next day.

(1) 讚！ | 希茅

2022.02.27: submitted to journal
2022.04.19: Major Revision, one reviewer was very detailed, made many requests, and added some content
2022.05.18: Resubmitted
2022.05.27: Minor Revision, the meticulous reviewer mentioned earlier raised some issues regarding details
2022.06.01: Submitted
2022.06.03: Accepted
2022.06.29: Published online
After acceptance, there were some miscellaneous issues, such as incorrect formula formatting and image clarity. Overall, grateful for the editor's patient communication.

(0) 讚！ | 木菁菁菁

2021.10.25: Submitted to journal
2021.11.1: Under review
2021.12.1: Minor revision (10 days)
2021.12.5: Revision submitted
2021.12.7: Accepted

(0) 讚！ | 小木

After finishing other papers, I had some leftover data. Following the principle of "even if it's just a watered-down SCI, it's still an SCI," I decided to submit it. The first external review was perfunctory, and two reviewers found several scattered errors, resulting in major revisions. Luckily, no additional experiments were required, and most of the issues were related to expression. After dragging on for a while, I made the necessary changes and resubmitted. One reviewer approved it, while the other made a few changes to punctuation and spacing in the manuscript. (This reviewer was really patient and meticulous.) Surprisingly, it was accepted the next evening. I am grateful to the editorial department for their incredibly efficient work. It took more than a month from start to finish, but if I hadn't been procrastinating during the major revision period, it probably could have been even faster.

(0) 讚！ | 红果果的锦鲤

2020.11.3  Submission
2021.1.4    Major revision, 19 comments from the first review, not difficult to answer
2021.1.18  Submitted revised manuscript
2021.1.20  Sent for editing and review
2021.2.11  Received comments on New Year's Eve morning, minor revision with 2 comments
2021.2.13  Resubmitted
2021.1.16  Accepted
The efficiency of the magazine editors is very fast, but the efficiency of external review depends on the mood of the experts. I had to wait for two months to receive the feedback. Overall, it was still easy to be accepted.

(0) 讚！ | 无人知晓

Submitted in September 2020, received review comments over two months later from two reviewers, with over 40 questions. After carefully revising it for a month, resubmitted the paper, underwent minor revisions once again, and accepted after half a month. The entire process took four months. This paper is more friendly towards the field of radioactive environment restoration and I recommend comrades engaged in related research to submit their work.

(0) 讚！ | 失望中的希望鑫

2019-10-25 submitted; 2019-11-18 revision requested; 2020-1-18 accepted; 2020-1-23 published online. Submission to JRNC for the first time. For those who graduated from the major of radiochemistry, it is very suitable to submit to this journal.

(2) 讚！ | Aknight Chong

2019.08.2 submit; 2019.09.22 major revision, two reviewers, one reviewer only raised a grammatical problem, the other reviewer raised some professional questions and required an experiment to be added. 2019.10.13 revised; 2019.10.17 accept.

(0) 讚！ | zhiping zhou@ecut

I’d like to ask the friends who have submitted to this journal, will the status of change to "under review" after "editor assigned"? One of my manuscripts has been in this state for half a month, and there is no change.

(7) 讚！ | 橙小橙

10.19 Submission11.03 Editor Resigned12.03 Notice minor repair, comments from two reviewers, given a one-month period12.10 Repair12.12 Editor Resigned12.13 Reviewers Resigned12.13 Reviews Completed12.13 Accept

(1) 讚！ | leadobe

I had to find a journal with a quick review time in order to graduate. In general, the review time is fast, suitable for those rushing to graduate. If there is no requirement for the IF and the article area, it is a good journal. The reviewer was very serious and responsible, and the questions raised elevate the article substantially.

(2) 讚！ | 865224077@qq.com

selectd N and finally refused, finally atJRNC receiving2017-9-21 Submission2017-11-03 A repair2017-12-16 AcceptA terrible paper full of ups and downs...

(3) 讚！ | 18297191646@163.com

is very fast, three weeks to give first-instance opinions, ten opinions, received two days after the repair.

(2) 讚！ | qxcokman@163.com

One-and-a-half-month trial period, two reviewers, less than 30 revision opinions; one month revised and submitted, againAfter reviewing the manuscript for more than a month, the language problem was overhauled and submitted again after half a month, and accepted one month later.The editor is very responsible and has a high language requirement.

(2) 讚！ | dianxin-li@foxmail.com

originally used this article to apply for a doctor, but was ruthlessly delayed, missedTime, fortunately, finally accepted.

(0) 讚！ | 528752750@qq.com

is really fast......

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Review is very fast, 2013.3.1 submit, 2013.4.11 accept, too unexpected!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名