Submitted on 2023.09.01
First revision on 2023.09.22
Revision on 2023.10.15
Accepted on 2023.11.12

(2) 讚！ | 落絮

May I ask if this journal has corresponding authors? If there are corresponding authors, are they identified by the authors themselves or is it indicated in the text that the authors contribute equally? Thank you for your response.

(0) 讚！ | 云朵奥

Submitted on February 9th, after one month, I received a notification for major revisions. There were two reviewers, the first reviewer had 30 questions, while the second reviewer had 11 questions. I answered each question one by one. One important experience I learned from this process is to answer exactly what the reviewers ask, avoiding unnecessary verbosity or brevity. The main goal is to address all the questions without any sense of complacency. I was given two months to complete the major revisions, which was quite a generous timeframe. After submission, I had to wait for another month. The first reviewer informed me that the paper would be accepted after minor revisions, while the second reviewer stated that major revisions were still needed. However, upon reviewing the feedback provided, I realized that most of the issues were related to formatting, which was manageable. I answered each question again and was given two more months. The questions were not difficult, and after one month, I resubmitted the revised paper, which was directly accepted. I was very excited because JQSRT is a reputable journal with recognized influence in the field. I have already published several papers in JQSRT, and I will continue to submit in the future.

Format: Single spacing is sufficient.

(5) 讚！ | 亲爱的小李

Just recording the time, I just voted today.

(0) 讚！ | 科研仕子小马

May I ask which editor did you choose for your submission? I also want to learn from your experience. Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | jianghe

An article was just accepted in October. How does the journal become a Q3 journal now?

(3) 讚！ | Mr Duan

The review speed was very fast for the result was given within one month. We submitted here for it was ranked in Q2. The editors were also very good. It took only 6 days from acceptance to pre-publication. I like this journal very much, and I will submit it again in the future.

(5) 讚！ | arrmii

The top journal in the field of radiation heat transfer! Generally, there are 3 reviewers, all of whom are experts in the field. If you do not have a solid basic knowledge, and it is easy to get beat by their questions. They have high requirements for innovation and language.

(4) 讚！ | aiyinsitan

Top journals in the field of radiation heat transfer!Generally, there are three reviewers, all of whom are in the industry, and the basic knowledge is not solid. They are asked twice, and they have higher requirements for innovation and language.

(0) 讚！ | aiyinsitan

has high requirements for innovation, English, and content logic

(1) 讚！ | Dumei

Editor's review is highly efficient and the review speed is faster.

(1) 讚！ | Anonymous

Editing speed is very fast, the best journal in the field of radiation heat transfer.The review comments are very professional and the language requirements are high and difficult.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

A journal with a very good influence factor of about 2.5 and radiation heat transfer.The manuscript is strict and serious, and requires a high level of English proficiency, which tends to be based on basic theory.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Reviewing is a bit slow, and it is ok after two revisions.A little disappointing is that the impact factor reached 3 last year, and this year it fell back to 2.The Chinese Academy of Sciences always ranks him in the 3rd district, and the level should be on the second district

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

07 has submited 1 in the field of light scattering, and was acceptd twice after overhaul.The review comments are very professional, and the editors give the review comments on time every month.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The heat and mass transfer field is very goodJournal.In June of this year, I submitted my first article. In July, I gave a reviewer's opinion. The two reviewers' comments were positive and pertinent. The suggestions were better. They all said that only minor modification is needed.Can be received as soon as possible.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

I have submitted papers to this journal twice. I feel that the reviewers are very responsible and the opinions of these reviewers are very pertinent. Last year, I helped submit one article, and the editor directly rejected the manuscript on the grounds that it was not within the scope of the journal. Overall, the journal is still good, the impact factor is close to 2.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

This is the top journal in the field of radiation heat transfer, the review speed is fast, but the acceptance rate is very low

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The international authoritative journal in the field of radiation heat transfer, the quality of the article is good, the review is strict, and the speed is fast, but it is not easy.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名