Two final reviewers

(0) 讚！ | jpingl1273

How many reviewers did you finally find?

(0) 讚！ | liiq000

2023.11.19 Submission
2024.02.20 Revision
2024.04.03 Review Meeting
2024.04.23 Acceptance
It was difficult to find reviewers, and it took more than forty attempts to find enough reviewers

(0) 讚！ | jpingl1273

Hello, may I ask how your progress is going?

(0) 讚！ | xyx565

Has the OP got any results now?

(0) 讚！ | xyx565

When can we expect the next steps from the editor? Is there any update from your side?

(0) 讚！ | Yolanda0909

Received by the editor by 20240220
The number of submissions received by February 14th has reached 420+

(0) 讚！ | Yolanda0909

Submission by 2024.2.7, assigned to editor after 2 hours, good luck!

(0) 讚！ | 止痛药

The editing process is very fast, and the quality of reviewers is very high (not sure if they are the super experts I recommended). The suggestions they provided greatly helped improve the quality of my paper (directly reanalyzing the data) and deepened my understanding of the research field. During the minor revision, one reviewer who accepted the task went missing (provided great help), almost delaying the final decision, and despite sending three reminder emails, I never got a response. In the end, I graduated with a Chinese thesis. After waiting for the missing reviewer for 3 months, the associate editor helped me review the paper directly. It took about 10 months from submission to acceptance. After inquiring a lot, it seems that the acceptance time of this journal is quite flexible, and rejections are also somewhat random, with a certain mystical element

(0) 讚！ | Austinwho

It should be the issue of the magazine editor. We submitted in March, and on April 2nd, the editor processed the manuscript for the first time, invited reviewers, but did not receive any response. Then, for more than two months, the editor did not make any progress. It's better to be cautious about submitting to this magazine!

(0) 讚！ | 西行寺运诚

Review speed: 12.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0 Focused research areas: suicide self-harm; depression; adolescent children sharing experiences: submitted for review after two weeks, received feedback after one month, then waited three months for the second round of feedback: major revision. Revised for over a month, resubmitted. Two weeks later, the first reviewer provided feedback, while waiting for the second reviewer for two months, finally the editor gave feedback based on the first reviewer's comments: minor revisions four points, very simple issues. Made immediate revisions, resubmitted, immediately under review, then three days later the reviewer completed the review, just the day before yesterday. Yesterday it was back to under review, the editor invited another reviewer, it has been over seven months, currently in a pending status, continuously worried that anxiety will affect doctoral admission. Sent three emails explaining the situation along the way, but received no response. Now seeing the words "under review" and feeling like I have PTSD. Don't know if it's an issue with the journal or my luck, wish me luck

(0) 讚！ | 小邦威吖

2.28投 - Submitted on February 28th
4.24修 - Under maintenance on April 24th
28日修完 - Maintenance completed on the 28th
5.30接收 - Received on May 30th
An average of two months for one round of review, not bad; scope accurate and impressive.

(1) 讚！ | 德文李甫西

Review Speed: 3.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 25.0
Experience Sharing: Be cautious when submitting basic articles, and do not rush if you are eager to graduate

(0) 讚！ | Elijah Wilhelmina

Have you received it? It's been over ten days since Xiao Xiu returned and went under review, how long after your acceptance did you go online?

(0) 讚！ | Elijah Wilhelmina

How is everything going back there?

(0) 讚！ | 形意如云

I am in the same situation now, it has been ten days with the editor after revising and submitting the manuscript. Can I ask what happens next? When will the result be out? Thank you!

(0) 讚！ | 形意如云

I have been working with the editor for half a month and feel frustrated

(0) 讚！ | 留云张豪

Review speed: 1.0 experience sharing: It has been half a month since the minor revisions were completed and it is still with the editor. Is this normal?

(0) 讚！ | 留云张豪

How to solve the same question?

(0) 讚！ | 终幕乙未

The translation of the text into English is: "The speed is extremely slow, so please be cautious when investing. The external review took 5 and a half months to notify the rejection."

(6) 讚！ | 匿名的用户

How long did the first trial take?

(0) 讚！ | 含芙酱大魔王

Review Speed: 6.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 50.0
Sharing Experience: Generally, once requested modifications are made, the submission will be accepted

(0) 讚！ | 长安香桃

Currently ORCID is optional, not mandatory. It is important to note that many publishers (including Elsevier, Wiley, Nature, Thomson Reuters) now require all researchers associated with their publications to use an ORCID iD.
If an article is published without providing an ORCID iD, how can it be added?
ORCID stands for Open Researcher and Contributor ID. The ORCID iD is a unique and persistent academic identity for authors, enabling them to be distinguished from other researchers and to record all of their relevant research activities. To add an ORCID iD for an author, you will need to log in to their account and then associate it in the account information settings

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Manuscript for the article

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What is MS?

(0) 讚！ | 龙鳞孝礼