May I ask how long it took from acceptance to the proofreading stage for you? It's been almost two months since I last heard anything about the proofreading, so I asked the editor who said they will contact me soon

(0) 讚！ | L3o

2023.4.16 Submission
4.18 Sent for external review
5.06 Uploaded review comments but sent for review again (possibly felt that the comments were not sufficient)
5.27 All comments returned for minor revisions (16 comments from 4 reviewers)
6.06 Completed revisions and submitted again
6.12 Received acceptance email
The above is my personal submission experience, hoping it will be helpful for everyone.
Overall, the editing process and review were very fast. Thank you.

(5) 讚！ | zjs

Friend, how did you submit your manuscript? When I click "submit a manuscript" on the submission page, it says I don't have permission. How can I submit my manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | happys

2022.8.20 Information Confirmation

(0) 讚！ | liuxiaobei

July 10th submission;
July 13th review;
August 1st feedback for revision;
August 8th revised;
August 11th accepted.

(0) 讚！ | liuxiaobei

Why can't I submit to the porous materials journal anymore? Has the journal stopped accepting submissions? Can anyone knowledgeable about the situation please provide an answer? Thank you!

(0) 讚！ | happys

Posted on March 23rd.
Received revision comments on April 10th from two reviewers. One accepted it directly, while the other provided three positive suggestions for improvement. The submission system did not indicate whether major or minor revisions were required.
Sent the revised version on April 15th.
Received an acceptance email on April 16th.

(5) 讚！ | zxr20786

Posted on March 23, 2022.

(0) 讚！ | zxr20786

I transferred on January 30th, and the system showed it was under review on February 3rd. However, the system's review time changed to March 2nd last month, and until now, there is no news. I want to ask if I can urge the submission, and if it will be rejected if I do so. I am anxiously waiting for this graduation paper and feeling extremely worried.

(0) 讚！ | 3°

Submitted on January 30th, reviewed on February 3rd, but later the system changed the review date to March 2nd. Until now, there has been no news. Can we urge them? I'm waiting for this graduation paper, afraid that if I urge them, it will be rejected.

(0) 讚！ | 3°

03.27, submission; 04.28, the review comments were received; there were 2 reviewers, whose comments were pertinent. For personal reasons, the manuscript was submitted on June 3; 06.07, officially accepted; 06.20, proofed; 06.24, published.

(0) 讚！ | 科研路

2019.6.13 Submission; 2019.8.28 Acceptance. The review is very fast. Review comments returned one and half months after submission. Then the manuscript was resubmitted after revision, and it was accepted within a week.

(2) 讚！ | 小桥流水人家

It is strongly not recommended to submit to this journal. The review speed is extremely slow: I submitted it in November 2016; I made a major revision in October 2017; it was accepted on November 2017; it was prepared for publication in August 2018; I was informed that it was cancelled as there were too many articles pended to be published on this journal. I was suggested transferring. Two-and-a-half-year results: submission, major revision, acceptance, to be published, pended, be suggested transferring. Super big cheat! Whoever submitted knows!

(6) 讚！ | jalksjflJAFD

I selectd for an article at the beginning of June, one month to notify Xiaoxiu, revised one month, accepted two months after uploading, the speed is okay.

(1) 讚！ | 洋书

2015 has been in continuous;2018, two consecutive articles were not submitted for review, and the journal was found to be too large, more than 80 per month, and 31 articles could be published in two months, with an acceptance rate of 31/160.Self-comfort, it’s not necessarily bad to not submit a trial, but not enough.

(0) 讚！ | 等等

The review speed is very slow, the first trial has experienced 7 months, but after the modification, receive

(0) 讚！ | tiancai

One and a half months to return the revised comments, two reviewers.Minor repairs return, received after 3 days.The official publication is full, about 8 months.

(1) 讚！ | zhwangs@163.com

submission and received the modification request one month later. The reviewer's suggestion was very rigorous and the questions raised were very pertinent. I spent 10 days to make trials and revisions..The revised article was replied to the editor and received an acceptance notice 25 days later.I think this journal is very efficient.

(3) 讚！ | 2539381237@qq.com

Aerogel, the article is relatively short, originally intended to select for the fast-track journals. After being rejected, it was turned into a porous one. The review was more than 2 months, the editor was very helpful, and the reviewer was veryThe profession is very serious, and the questions raised are very helpful in improving the level of the article.Submitted on October 8th, received on January 18.

(1) 讚！ | pandm

I wish you all the best!!

(0) 讚！ | dkyu123@126.com

The review cycle mainly depends on the reviewer.

(0) 讚！ | 119057881

The review cycle mainly depends on the reviewer.

(0) 讚！ | 119057881

21 The results of the review were received, minor repairs, repaired after 4 days, second trial, received after 5 days.

(1) 讚！ | Great

this journal is quite easy, but I don't knowWhy, the partition has been on the side, the first half of 2016 is the three districts, and now it has become the four districts, and it is faint.

(0) 讚！ | happyboy

This journal pertains to carbon aerogel. Overall, I feel the review process is very fast. If you do not have an urgent time requirement, you should consider this journal.

(8) 讚！ | 你微笑好美