20180427 underconsideration20180601 major revision20170608 resubmition20170612 acceptProf. Bert Meijer is very nice!Polymer old brand

(0) 讚！ | 1376123745@qq.com

must be praised by the editor, the results will be published within one month, and the editor will personally participate in the review.After the first rejection, the editor wrote a complaint letter, and then the editor found the reviewer to arbitrate during the Christmas period, and then let the re-submitment, re-submitment and direct receipt.The old polymer journal, such a dedicated editor is worthy of respect!

(1) 讚！ | 路过的人

20170306 underconsideration20170525 major revision20170608 resubmition20170612 acceptProf. Bert Meijer is very nice!

(4) 讚！ | 123

The first article in the period of Dr., I think it is innovative, the content is comprehensive, and the quality of the article is very high.I selectd for Macromolecule, Polymer Journal, and then selected this journal. The reviewer gave a lot of valuable revisions and received it after revision.

(1) 讚！ | coco

Very good journal in the polymer, returning the revised comments in one month's review cycle, overhaul, spend a month to modify and then repair, directly received after two days, the efficiency is very high, it is recommended that you deliver

(8) 讚！ | wangdong@iccas.ac.cn

reference insect friends' comments, chose the highly efficient editor Karen Wooley.Ms. Wooley is very nice. The two reviewers and opinions are minor repairs. I received it on the same day after the revision.It feels as long as the structure is novel, the characterization data is comprehensive + the biological experiment is better.Submitted on May 2, assigned on May 3, under review on May 5, returned to Minor on May 20, and received on the day of May 29.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

compared with the related journals of ACS and RSCThe processing speed of JPS-A is very slow.If you can choose a similar journal with ACS or RSC, I suggest that you do not submit to this journal as much as possible.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I want to ask the landlord, how to upload the revised manuscript, about the map and the table?Do graphs and tables need to be placed in the body or uploaded separately?The editor's reply specifically emphasized that

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

J PS PART A's review speed is indeed slow, and the status of the submitted has been assigned to the reviewer, and one day after three months, it was minorly repaired.The reviewers were very friendly and received after ten days of minor repairs.The structure is novel and the characterization must be comprehensive.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

has submited in several articles in this journal, generally returning results in two months, but the last edit of Wooley, Karen is very efficient, returning comments within ten days, 4 reviewers, minor repairsHowever, there are more problems. I changed it for two days to upload, and I received it within one week. Online is not available for one month. The speed is still relatively strong. The work is comprehensive or very good.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Choosing female editor wooley, people are very good, very fast, 20 days to return to modify my opinion of 4 reviewers, raised a bunch of questions, made up the experiment, carefully revised, the editor quickly received.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The comments given by the two reviewers are more detailed, but there is not much content involved.The speed is very fast, and the journal is also within 8 months.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

On November 27th, the manuscript was submitted, and the review comments were received on January 6th.Submitted on January 13th.Accepted on January 30th.The recent request has become higher, from the original two reviewers to three.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

11.4Submission, received on the evening of 11.29, the speed is still very good!It is better to have innovations in the article!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal Homepage URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0518

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

In the field of polymer scienceThe level of journals, the speed of review is relatively fast, after receiving PROOF, online speed is relatively fast, suitable for a relatively new or comprehensive work articles.My second article was rejected after less than a week, and the chances of submitting the case were not given.The third article was sent directly in less than 20 days, and the composition of luck is still not small.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I feel that the review speed is a bit slow, and I have an echo for a full 3 months (although I heard that some editors will be faster, 1 month is enough).The reviewers are two.The journal does not pay much attention to the performance of the material, but the synthetic design is somewhat new, and the structural performance is best characterized.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The second-rate journal in the polymer, the whole is not bad, I have an entire article here, the submitted of the big molecule is not transferred to submitted

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

this yearOne article, the final manuscript fell on the hands of the Japanese, just happened to encounter the earthquake in Japan, sent an email reminder, and soon gave it.The feeling is that the data is more detailed, the language is smooth, and there are 1-2 innovation points to pass.It is a little anxious to wait for time~~

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The review speed is very fast, just after submiting less than a month, there is news, minor repair.Received two days after submission.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Reviewing speed is very fast, about one and a half months.It feels that there is no requirement for the performance of the material, mainly focusing on new synthetic methods, or synthesizing new polymer materials, and some working systems.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

A good journal for polymers, it feels more difficult to select recently.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

This journal is second-tier in the field of polymers. The content is biased towards polymer synthesis and characterization. The speed of reviewing depends; sometimes it is fast and sometimes it is slow. I have seen the fastest one get reviewed in 15 days and the slowest one in 80 days. The journal is very concerned about self-citing, which is also a reason for the rise of IF in recent years, the editor will even remind you to cite more. In the past two years, there are fewer and fewer high-quality articles.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

is still good in polymers, and the speed of review is also faster.The journal's article is very important for the characterization of polymers. If you want to select, you must make a clear description of the basic structure of the polymer. Otherwise, the reviewer will pass, and the editor will make you supplement.The impact factor will also be greatly improved, because the editor will ask you to quote the journal's article.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

This journal is a good one in the polymer industry. In recent years, the impact factor has also been steadily improved, and the speed of review is ok, 1~2 months.However, in my opinion, it is generally better for old acquaintances to be sent to the trial.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名