It was very slow. The first review took three months, the manuscript was rejected and resubmitted, and the review has not been completed for three months. Students who are anxious to graduate should be careful to submit papers.

(3) 讚！ | 双十一

I feel that there was no news for 2 to 3 months after submitting to this journal. The review speed was a bit slow. I submitted it on September 2017, and it was not accepted until February 2018. I made minor revision twice during the period. I felt it was a bit slow, so I don't recommend this. My supervisor said that he won't consider this journal in the future.

(2) 讚！ | 寒天晨晨

I submitted my manuscript in July 2017. I revised it three times and it was rejected in December 2018. Submitted in July 2017, revised 3 times in the middle, and it was rejected in December 2018. The rejection letter was issued by the editor-in-chief. The reason for the rejection was simple: "I think there is a problem with your test method, and there is a problem of nutrient adsorption in the soil for potting." I appealed to the editor-in-chief letting him know that the potted plant was in river sand (not soil). He then replied that: "Although you may say that readers may believe it, I think that your method has problems. Another suggestion is that you can re-submit to our journal after modifying the information, but the resubmission means a new manuscript. In the past, all of the review process was abolished, and the review process should be repeated." I believe that the real reason for rejection is that this journal publishes more than 100 articles each year, and there is a backlog of manuscripts. The review period is very long, and it takes an average of 3–4 months to obtain feedback on the revised comments. Even after the manuscript is revised, and even with just minor revisions, it is likely to be rejected.

(0) 讚！ | hereuo020768

difficult to select, rigorous toCan only be rejected

(0) 讚！ | six

Plant Nutrition Professional Mid-Range Journal

(0) 讚！ | 匿名