Hello. May I ask, where can I see that the external audit has been conducted?

(0) 讚！ | YuanYuan

Excuse me, it's been a week.
In My Authoring Activity, it shows Status: Under Review.
In ACS Researcher Resources, it shows Associate Editor Assigned (Your manuscript has been assigned to an Associate Editor (Dr. Gregory Scholes) for further evaluation.)
Is it still in the hands of the editor and not yet sent out for external review?

(0) 讚！ | YuanYuan

Comrade, how long will it take for the results to come out in the end?

(0) 讚！ | YuanYuan

Bro, how long does it take for the results to come out?

(0) 讚！ | YuanYuan

The paper I initially submitted to ACS Nano was rejected by one reviewer, so the editor suggested I submit it to JPCL instead. I did, but after 5 days, the editor at JPCL also rejected it. It's really frustrating, submitting a paper is really just luck.

(1) 讚！ | jiayuyuyuy

9.24 Submission for revision, two reviewers, one minor revision and one major revision.
9.25 Revised.
10.3 Acceptance, no comments from the reviewer of the major revision, recommended for acceptance.
10.3 Sign publication agreement.
10.3 ACS publication proof.

Submitted and accepted in less than a month, I would call JPCL the Usain Bolt of the non-OA world.

(0) 讚！ | rugals

9.7投
9.11分配副编辑

Translation: 
9.7投
9.11 Assign deputy editor

(1) 讚！ | rugals

It's been ten days since the repair and there's been no news. What's going on?

(0) 讚！ | 木菇

Ten years ago, this journal was still rated over 9 points, but now it has fallen to just over 5 points. It's like a difficult situation for Langmuir and JPC, and the assessment is not as effective as CEJ

(1) 讚！ | 笨蛋水凝胶啊

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and title them as "English Translation:" and "Japanese Translation:"

2024.03.1 Edit

(0) 讚！ | 树深时见鹿em

2024.2.26 Format modified
2024.2.28 Revised

(0) 讚！ | 树深时见鹿em

Ask the older brother the same question, how to determine if there will be a retrial

(0) 讚！ | 树深时见鹿em

I hope for better luck

(0) 讚！ | 树深时见鹿em

2024.2.26 Under review

(0) 讚！ | 树深时见鹿em

How are you doing, brother?

(0) 讚！ | soalr

Soon, receive in 2 months, instant if only 4.0, expected impact factor will drop next year

(1) 讚！ | Taqiangrentaqiang

Could you please advise if the reviewers only accept the revisions, and then send them back for modification, is there another round of peer review? Or is it up to the editor to make the final decision? I'm confused as to why I had to go through peer review again, and it has been delayed for another half a month

(0) 讚！ | 阿宗

Submitted on October 4th, received first round of revisions on October 27th. Two reviewers, one minor revision accepted directly, one major revision accepted after some changes. The suggestions in the major revision were not significant. Both reviewers stated that no further revisions were needed. However, the paper was sent for peer review again on October 29th. Final acceptance letter received on November 15th, with formatting revisions. Proof and final PDF were available two days after submission, very efficient process

(1) 讚！ | 阿宗

The decrease in impact factor has reasons behind it. Simply pursuing popular disciplines, however, only brings submissions that have been rejected by other journals.

(0) 讚！ | xueba

The impact factor has decreased, it's hard to describe it in just one word!

(122) 讚！ | sapphire

May I ask if JPCL has strict word limits? If so, what is the maximum limit? Thank you very much.

(0) 讚！ | sunxiaofeng

I submitted my application on May 21st, and I remember being assigned an editor within 3 days. However, the status has not changed since then, and it has always been "Under Review" since the moment of submission.

(0) 讚！ | sapphire

The article submitted on the 19th is still in the hands of the chief editor. It feels like it hasn't been processed yet, and the editor hasn't been assigned. It doesn't meet the response speed of Letters.

(0) 讚！ | appletree

JPCL used to be in the first district. In 2021, both the basic version and the upgraded version were in the first district. In December, it dropped to the second district.

(0) 讚！ | 李杨

The review process is fast, with two reviewers who are both very professional. It is evident that the chosen peer reviewer shares the same research field as me. Through their answers to the questions, the article has indeed been improved significantly, which is worth recommending. However, the impact factor has dropped considerably in recent years, whereas some energy materials journals have experienced a crazy surge in impact factor. I hope the journal pays attention to the impact factor.

(2) 讚！ | Huxiang