It's been ten days since the repair and there's been no news. What's going on?

(0) 讚！ | 木菇

Ten years ago, this journal was still rated over 9 points, but now it has fallen to just over 5 points. It's like a difficult situation for Langmuir and JPC, and the assessment is not as effective as CEJ

(1) 讚！ | 笨蛋水凝胶啊

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and title them as "English Translation:" and "Japanese Translation:"

2024.03.1 Edit

(0) 讚！ | 树深时见鹿em

2024.2.26 Format modified
2024.2.28 Revised

(0) 讚！ | 树深时见鹿em

Ask the older brother the same question, how to determine if there will be a retrial

(0) 讚！ | 树深时见鹿em

I hope for better luck

(0) 讚！ | 树深时见鹿em

2024.2.26 Under review

(0) 讚！ | 树深时见鹿em

How are you doing, brother?

(0) 讚！ | soalr

Soon, receive in 2 months, instant if only 4.0, expected impact factor will drop next year

(1) 讚！ | Taqiangrentaqiang

Could you please advise if the reviewers only accept the revisions, and then send them back for modification, is there another round of peer review? Or is it up to the editor to make the final decision? I'm confused as to why I had to go through peer review again, and it has been delayed for another half a month

(0) 讚！ | 阿宗

Submitted on October 4th, received first round of revisions on October 27th. Two reviewers, one minor revision accepted directly, one major revision accepted after some changes. The suggestions in the major revision were not significant. Both reviewers stated that no further revisions were needed. However, the paper was sent for peer review again on October 29th. Final acceptance letter received on November 15th, with formatting revisions. Proof and final PDF were available two days after submission, very efficient process

(1) 讚！ | 阿宗

The decrease in impact factor has reasons behind it. Simply pursuing popular disciplines, however, only brings submissions that have been rejected by other journals.

(0) 讚！ | xueba

The impact factor has decreased, it's hard to describe it in just one word!

(122) 讚！ | sapphire

May I ask if JPCL has strict word limits? If so, what is the maximum limit? Thank you very much.

(0) 讚！ | sunxiaofeng

I submitted my application on May 21st, and I remember being assigned an editor within 3 days. However, the status has not changed since then, and it has always been "Under Review" since the moment of submission.

(0) 讚！ | sapphire

The article submitted on the 19th is still in the hands of the chief editor. It feels like it hasn't been processed yet, and the editor hasn't been assigned. It doesn't meet the response speed of Letters.

(0) 讚！ | appletree

JPCL used to be in the first district. In 2021, both the basic version and the upgraded version were in the first district. In December, it dropped to the second district.

(0) 讚！ | 李杨

The review process is fast, with two reviewers who are both very professional. It is evident that the chosen peer reviewer shares the same research field as me. Through their answers to the questions, the article has indeed been improved significantly, which is worth recommending. However, the impact factor has dropped considerably in recent years, whereas some energy materials journals have experienced a crazy surge in impact factor. I hope the journal pays attention to the impact factor.

(2) 讚！ | Huxiang

This journal has never been in the top tier, so how can we talk about returning to the top tier...

(0) 讚！ | 上交学者

If you can't do it yourself, don't look for a sense of existence here. It's just an ordinary journal in the second district.

(126) 讚！ | mjkIII

Posted on January 20th, the status has not changed. How can I check if it has been submitted for review?

(0) 讚！ | 地势坤

Excuse me, does this journal accept catalytic chemistry? Specifically, in the area of catalyst material synthesis.

(0) 讚！ | xiaohan W

Very fast, very friendly. It can be published in just one month.

(1) 讚！ | yuyurs

The review process is very fast, and the editor is very nice. Minor revisions are accepted.

(1) 讚！ | zx-TXT

Posted on July 12th, received feedback on August 4th, made two minor revisions and one major revision. After making the revisions based on the minor feedback, resubmission for review was not required and it was accepted. The feedback for the major revision was also positive and it was sent back on the 11th and accepted on the 19th. Overall, the speed was fast and the reputation of JPCL is still good. However, recently the impact factor has not kept up. I hope it can return to the ranks of the first zone of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

(2) 讚！ | luke001