Pretty fast, the topic is about artificial intelligence drugs, there is innovation, one day for external review, one month for external review and major revision, feels like the editor is trying to fish, one reviewer gave 7 suggestions, the other reviewer kept praising and then suggested to revise according to the editor's opinions. The editor gave more than 3000 words of suggestions (suggested revisions from Abstract to Conclusions), basically rewriting the manuscript, reorganizing the methods, and carefully replying with almost ten thousand words to them. It is currently under re-review and hopes it can be accepted. Currently, it has been about one and a half months since the second round of submission

(0) 讚！ | 不发10篇SCI不换名字

I have also been unable to access the EAB page. Can you please give me some guidance? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | FENG9

I recommend consulting the editorial advisory committee and the scientific advisory link. Why has it been unable to access? It needs some guidance.

(0) 讚！ | 温斯顿顿吃不饱

A pattern diagram is a speculation or deduction made based on the results, which is usually included in the discussion

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

It is generally regarded as such

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Should the diagram be displayed in the discussion or in the results section?

(0) 讚！ | 八坂篷蔚

Hello, I'd like to ask if this journal is processed quickly

(0) 讚！ | 京城艳艳

Does the first paragraph of a discussion always need to summarize the article?

(0) 讚！ | 上清雨真

Is it possible to receive emails regarding revisions only through the corresponding author's email address?

(0) 讚！ | 太山香山

Hello, this journal allows for co-first authorship and co-corresponding authorship

(0) 讚！ | 太山香山

Hello! Can I add a contact method? I urgently need guidance.

(0) 讚！ | hiohufyyi

My first article as the first author. I share it immediately after online. I feel the efficiency of this journal was very high, and there was no time wasted at every step. It was sent for review soon after submission (reviewers should be selected from EAB members. There will be a form with names and research directions in it. You can choose reviewers related to what you are doing. There are many reviewers, but I don’t know anyway. I just picked a few relatively relevant reviewers). 12 days after being sent for review, the review comments were returned, and major revision was required. The questions raised by the reviewers were relatively good. And the second reviewer helped me revise many language errors. There were some principled questions, as long as they were answered sincerely and references were cited to support them, there would be no problem. I was not required to supplement the experiments, but the time given for revision was 60 days (pretty long). The revised manuscript was submitted in 2 or 3 weeks, and it still took 12 days for the second review. It was then accepted, and it was soon online. I feel that the editor-in-chief, associate editor and reviewers I met were serious and responsible. Good luck to everyone.

(4) 讚！ | 自由鲜奶

May I ask how long the first review might take? How high is the acceptance rate? Is it easy to get published here? Thank you

(0) 讚！ | 平原峻成

Which EAB members and scientific advisors in this journal are cell-absorbed or important research directions?The journal recommended reviewers seem to have to have EAB members and scientific advisors.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

Review Speed: 2.0 | Acceptance Rate: 50.0
Experience Sharing: Which EAB members and scientific advisors of this journal are experts in cell absorption or important research areas? It seems that recommended reviewers for the journal must be EAB members and scientific advisors

(0) 讚！ | 震雷文瑾

I need help identifying which members of the Editorial Advisory Board and scientific advisors of this magazine are experts in cell absorption or important research directions. It seems that recommended reviewers for the magazine must be EAB members or scientific advisors

(0) 讚！ | 藤原山灵

Editing is very fastIt can be sent out to the reviewer within one day. It is very good to follow up ing

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The editing was quickly accepted and could be sent to reviewers within a day. Great! Looking forward to the next steps

(0) 讚！ | 上清新霞

Two reviewers, each reviewed for a month, and their comments and suggestions were all good. The reviewers were very familiar with the field. After a month of careful revisions, all the reviewers' comments were positively addressed and the manuscript was returned. 40 days later, it was accepted directly

(0) 讚！ | 法慧彩云

2 Reviewers, 1 month for review, suggestions and suggestions are good, reviewers are very familiar with the field; carefully revised for one month, all positive feedback comments, return, 40Received directly after the day.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

is submitteding this journal. Can I find the Editorial Advisory Board on the Internet that asks for 2 reviewers?There is no paper version of the journal, thank you

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I am submitting this magazine. Where can I find the online editorial advisory board that requires two reviewers?

(0) 讚！ | 药王沛萍

I would like to ask where I can find the guarantee certificate required by this magazine. The editor asked me to send a certificate, and also requested that at least two reviewers are members of the editorial advisory board. How should I handle this? Thank you very much

(0) 讚！ | Marshall Arnold

would like to ask the guarantee required by this journal Where can I find it?The editor-in-chief asked me to send a letter of guarantee in the past. I also asked me that at least two reviewers are members of the editorial advisory committee. What should I do?I am very grateful that

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

has a medium impact factor, but it has a great influence in the drug circle. I also attach great importance to the review of the journal. If there is a certain quality, the level is too good, and it will be released.The impact factor remains constant

(2) 讚！ | 匿名