It is also said without innovation. The key point is that if there is no innovation, it should be rejected by the editor, but you rejected it directly after giving me hope! Be careful to submit. There were no constructive suggestions given. The reviewers said that my compound has no fluorine spectrum data, but it was obviously there! I have no idea.

(0) 讚！ | Jun_123

The article was submitted out in mid-February, and then it was a long wait, in which the status date changed three times, until mid-June.The result of the review, because there is no news for a long time, they basically gave up.It is not particularly concerned about information, so it was not until early July that the information on the review was seen.There was only one reviewer for the comments. Some questions were fairly pertinent. It was not difficult to amend them. After a few days, they were repaired. It took less than a week to accept the notice.

(0) 讚！ | HPEPS

Care select!With editor status for one month, send email without echo!The processing editor I showed is the one in Hong Kong.Finally wrote a retraction letter, only one sentence: due to the inefficient processing of the editor, I decided to withdraw the manuscript I selectd for!

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

has innovation, metal organic, macromolecule, application value

(1) 讚！ | xfj66@126.com

After the select, the state has changed 3 times. 8.20 submission 9.6under review 9.26 change under review 10.29 under review has been 70 days without review comments time is long, do not know what the situationDo you have any friends you know?prayer!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

My paper was rejected after making the revisions requested by Inorganic Chemistry. Then I submitted to this journal, and the two reviewers had more comments than Inorganic Chemistry. Since the reviewers’ comments of this journal included all of the opinions of Inorganic Chemistry, I suspected that there is a common reviewer for the two journals (I did not recommend the same reviewer). I made revisions within a month, sent it back, the journal indicated that there was a language problem, and I revised it within a few days.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

Submitted for 1 month, only under review, before with editor status, I don't know what it means

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

From submission to receiving for about 45 days, it is two points: too many submissions, not likeACS is simple; from the receipt of the page number is slow, I received it in early April, only came out in mid-June

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

speed is OK, submitted for 40 days to modify the comments, minor repair, repaired two weeks laterHired.Emphasis on metal-organic complexes, the structure is generally accepted.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

is still quite a problem enough new

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

because of the data to be filled, so I did a 10 day experiment, but stillThere is one that cannot meet the requirements of the reviewer. In fact, if it is satisfied, it may be a good time to select for a journal.It took about 20 days to repair it before it was accepted.However, I have just estimated that there are currently 95 articles in the state of the press, 20 in the first issue, and half-monthly. It takes three months to get the page number.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

45After the day, the results of the review are obtained. Two reviewers, one directly accepts, and the other accepts according to their opinions (2). The editorial conclusion is a major revision, according to whichAfter reviewing the comments of a reviewer, consider whether to accept it.I have been repaired for about 10 days, and there is still no news, I am looking forward to it!!!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Heavy metal-organic complex, crystalNon-organic metal complexes with better structure will also be accepted, preferring to receive manuscripts with biological properties

(1) 讚！ | 匿名