Why does my submission go under review as soon as I submit it?

(0) 讚！ | 长拳觅露

When will the first draft be revised?

(0) 讚！ | 一条小蔚然

When was it fixed?

(0) 讚！ | 一条小蔚然

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Emphasized research area: Mechanism research of brain gliomas
Experience sharing: The first review took 3 months, with minor revisions recommended. I was given 3 months for revisions, but it took me 2 months to complete. The editor reminded me once during the process, but overall the editing process was good. The revised paper was accepted 3 days after submission. The process after that was quite fast

(0) 讚！ | 极乐智敏

It has been a year, and still no news. Submitted in August last year, revised in February this year, then revised again in February. Another six months have passed, with no updates. I ask every two months, and the answer is always that the decision is in the hands of the editor

(0) 讚！ | Jind

It took me a week to find reviewers for this journal and I feel that it is particularly difficult

(0) 讚！ | 艾格尼丝奥康纳

Does anyone know how long the first instance will take? It has been over three months since assigning for review. I have sent emails to urge them, and the reply says they will contact the editor and will reach out to me at any time. However, there has been no further communication for several days

(0) 讚！ | 映珍少女

So long? It's been a month and a half

(0) 讚！ | 极乐智敏

Hello, how long does it usually take for assigning for review?

(0) 讚！ | 映珍少女

Waiting period is a bit long, and there is no progress visible halfway.

(1) 讚！ | 难产的菜鸡

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: The efficiency of the journal is not very high. It took four months for the first review and another two months after revisions. In total, it took nearly seven months before finally being accepted

(0) 讚！ | 艾格尼丝奥康纳

The efficiency of this journal is too low. I submitted it on July 1st, and it has been under review for four months. After revising a few minor suggestions, it has been a month and there is still no news.

(0) 讚！ | 难产的菜鸡

It has always been assigning for review, giving the drafts to editor Cui, and always mentioning that it is in the hands of subject experts.

(0) 讚！ | Jangdou

Is your status still under review? And the date hasn't changed either?

(0) 讚！ | 尹天仇

A review article, it has been almost three months and I am still editing it.

(0) 讚！ | Jangdou

How long is the review cycle? It feels a bit long... It has been almost a month with no progress.

(0) 讚！ | 尹天仇

Why are there so many review requests? It has been almost three months since submission.

(0) 讚！ | Jangdou

How long has it been under review later? Is it also a month and a half or assigning for review?

(0) 讚！ | 是你的子博呀

I have been submitting this magazine for half a month now, and the initial status is "Under Review," which should be for internal review. If the magazine goes through external review, will the status change?

(0) 讚！ | science_one

The opinions of this journal were very professional. There were 4 reviewers. Although the editor-in-chief and statistical editor rejected it, but the comments raised were of great help to the manuscript. After the quality of the journal comes up, the impact factor has risen greatly.

(1) 讚！ | 一生何求

The IF is going to exceed 5. A very professional journal. The reviewers' comments were full 8 pages. It is a bit low to be included in Q3.

(0) 讚！ | 李二蛋

Seeking for experiences and sharing

(0) 讚！ | Oliver Jerry

Slow

(0) 讚！ | Yulius

Old magazines are still relatively stable. 138****8855 Posted on July 18, 2017 SCI(2014): 2.594 SCI(2015): 2.689 SCI(2016): 2.481 The decline is continuous. Will it break 2? It has fallen a lot in just one year, even if it is only 0.1 point, it should be cherished

(0) 讚！ | 宗室笑卉

Falling non-stop, if it goes down further, will it break 2? It has dropped significantly in just one year, even if it's just 0.1 points, it should be cherished

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁