Apr. 19, Submitted to Journal
Apr. 20, With Editor
Apr. 21, With Editor
Apr. 22, Under Review
May. 10, Under Review
May. 11, Required Reviews Completed
May. 15, Required Reviews Completed
May. 16, Decision in Process
May. 18, Revise
Jul. 15, With Editor
Jul. 20, With Editor
Jul. 23, Under Review
Aug. 10, Decision in Process
Aug. 11, Revise
Aug. 16, With Editor
Aug. 17, With Editor
Aug. 18, Decision in Process
Aug. 19, Accept

(1) 讚！ | 吴孑夫

Is this magazine a collection of reviews?

(0) 讚！ | 小野寺骊茹

Do I need to pay a layout fee?

(0) 讚！ | 明朗mm

Posted on February 7, 2021.
Major revision in June 2021.
Minor revision on August 30, 2021, I set it aside for a month without processing the article. Modified the document on October 6, 2021.
Accepted on October 17, 2021.

(50) 讚！ | Nemo46

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 75.0
Emphasis on research directions: Neuroscience; Experimental methods; Protocol sharing
Experience: It took half a year from submission to acceptance, with two revisions in between. Five reviewers needed to be recommended at the time of submission, based on the research field and academic activity of the authors cited in the references, along with reasons for recommendation. The status changed to under review the day after submission. Reviewer comments were returned in about a month. All three reviewers paid great attention to the completeness of information such as reagents. Generally, after revising according to the review comments, the paper was improved

(0) 讚！ | 无影书凝

There has been an increase, optimistic about the future, what do you think?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

The reviewers of this journal are very rigorous in their critique. They have helped researchers a lot.

(2) 讚！ | Anonymous

The reviewers of this journal are very rigorous, with many questions, and I have gained a lot of experience from them. The reviewers have been very helpful

(0) 讚！ | 盖尔莫尔

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: Got accepted once, focuses more on originality, fast speed, each cycle lasts about a month. It takes less than two months from submission to acceptance, so it is important to choose a good reviewer. You can give it a try~

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Emphasis on Methodological Innovation. I received a paper mid-last year. Overall, the quality requirements did not seem very high, but there was a relatively high demand for methodological innovation. I revised it a month after submission, resubmitted it two months later, and it was accepted two days later. It took a total of three months from submission to acceptance, which is considered quite fast. When submitting, it was necessary to specify a reviewer, but in the end, I am not sure if the person I specified actually helped with the review

(0) 讚！ | 天际雨石

Mainly reflect on creativity

(0) 讚！ | 仲夏恨荷

Terrible magazine

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... /authorinstructions

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: Emphasize methodology, combining different methodologies with each other. Such as in vivo fluorescence with electrophysiology, patch clamp with confocal, etc. Not easy to publish

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁