Review speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Emphasized research direction: Reproductive endocrinology; Amino acid transporter
Sharing experience: It took a long time, there was a period of time when I couldn't contact the editor, almost on the verge of collapse, but fortunately, it was finally accepted smoothly

(0) 讚！ | 雾都星晖

After two months of revisions, the feedback from the reviewers was quite professional and greatly improved the article. The editor was also very helpful in making revisions. Now I'm waiting for the results after the major revisions

(1) 讚！ | Adxs

How much is the layout fee?

(0) 讚！ | 袈裟桂月

Submission acceptance rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: Old magazine, accepted after minor revisions

(0) 讚！ | 一只云飞呀

I would like to inquire whether you accept articles on network pharmacology

(0) 讚！ | 四风辛丑

July 6, submission; 61 days later, a major revision was required; 22 days later, revised submission; after 10 days, notice for minor revisions received; 6 days later, a minor revision was required; 1 day later, notice for acceptance was received. Before this, it was with editor for 45 days, there has been no news, and I thought it would be a tragedy. But don’t be anxious. Just wait!

(0) 讚！ | 我是涛哥哥

07-06 Submission; then it was with editor for 45 days. I sent the reminder letter, and it was useless. I will withdraw it if there is no news in another 15 days of waiting. It's dreadful. A good old brand journal was wasted by the editorial office.

(2) 讚！ | 我是涛哥哥

Is that you, Brother Peng?

(0) 讚！ | 乌龙琬晴

Will IF rise back to 3 this year?

(0) 讚！ | 巴蜀向真

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 75.0
Experience sharing: Initial review took three months. Major revisions were given three weeks. Accepted revisions within two days. Proofreading took half a month. Online publication after a month

(0) 讚！ | 风陵依珂

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: The first review took nearly 2 months, and after receiving revisions, it was accepted the very next day. The editor was very efficient

(0) 讚！ | 风陵依珂

Real-time if 2.1453.17if should be at 2.9

(0) 讚！ | Olive Walton

Slightly on the edge of a 3-point lead, hoping to maintain stability, a slight increase is also good

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 1.0 | Acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: One month after submission, the first round of review feedback is provided, requesting major revisions. Two weeks after revisions are submitted, the second round of review feedback is given, requesting minor revisions. The paper is accepted the day after minor revisions are made. Very efficient!

(0) 讚！ | Ruth Twain

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: Submitted on May 3rd, required reviews complete on May 31st, received an email from the editor on June 1st for minor revisions, submitted revised manuscript on June 10th. Couldn't wait any longer by mid-July, sent a reminder email to the editor. Received a reply a week later saying it had been sent to the chief editor. Finally officially accepted on August 3rd, taking a total of 3 months. The first review process was still relatively fast

(0) 讚！ | 普花小可爱

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: This journal is a well-established one, the submission process was relatively smooth, got notified for revision after a month, and the revised version was accepted directly!

(0) 讚！ | Darcy Whit

This journal is an old journal, the submission is relatively smooth, and the notice will be revised after one month.

(0) 讚！ | huanghuiling@126.com

Review Speed: 1.0 | Acceptance Rate: 50.0
Experience Sharing: I submitted my paper on March 31, 2015 and received acceptance on July 24, 2015. It went through two rounds of revisions, but overall it was acceptable. The reviewer provided constructive feedback, especially on minor issues. It was a good learning experience!

(0) 讚！ | 龙鳞思雅

Review Speed: 6.0 Experience Sharing: The initial review took more than 3 months, the external review took 1 month, with minor revisions directly and acceptance in about 10 days after resubmission. The reviewers seem very professional and the journal is of high quality, so it should be accepted

(0) 讚！ | 是文明吖

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: The initial review was completed in one month, which was very fast. At that time, three reviewers were recommended, but it is unknown how many were actually sent to. One of them provided very positive feedback, but also pointed out the errors in a very careful manner, especially the small, hard-to-find mistakes. After responding carefully, the reviewer provided feedback in just 4 days, and the status changed to "Required Reviews Completed." After waiting for the field editor's feedback for 2 weeks, and unable to wait any longer, a reminder was sent and the article was accepted the next day. Personally, it is important to choose the right topic, and after writing, it is essential to have someone proofread and revise the article before submitting. Rushing to submit may lower the chances of success. Based on the personal article number and the articles submitted, the acceptance rate should be less than or close to 50%

(0) 讚！ | Molly Samuel

It has been two months since the submission, and the article has still not been reviewed. It's quite slow

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Accepted after seven months of submission, with one major revision in between, a recommended magazine

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 75.0 Experience sharing: Submissions were accepted after around two months. The initial review took over a month, and the language was revised by a professional in advance, receiving not much criticism. After carefully responding to each suggestion, the submission was accepted two days after the deadline for responses. It is possible that the topic was to their liking. This article had been rejected multiple times by other journals of similar caliber. Therefore, it is important to submit in the right direction

(0) 讚！ | 九阳语蓉

It has been about half a month since the submission, but the status remains "with editor." I have written a letter to inquire about this, but the response was very cold, suggesting that all I can do is wait. After nearly a month, the editor contacted me and pointed out that the submission was not up to standard and required further improvement. However, they did not specify the areas that needed correction, indicating that it took almost a month for the technical editor to review my manuscript. What's even more puzzling is that the submission status in the system still shows "with editor," meaning I cannot make any corrections. In my personal experience, the efficiency is too low, and the attitude is average. If you are pressed for time, please proceed with caution. I must clarify that the reason I did not find the modification guide mentioned by the magazine is due to my own mistake. I submitted the manuscript using two different accounts, one of which was incomplete

(0) 讚！ | 断门娴淑