How long does it take for editors to provide comments after receiving feedback from reviewers?

(0) 讚！ | Rebecca Lytton

Under review

(0) 讚！ | 子昂mio

Just wondering

(0) 讚！ | 子昂mio

What will happen if the format is wrong? I was so confused that I forgot to change the format directly, and I didn't upload the whole picture in WB

(0) 讚！ | 千花寻阳

Do you only need the WB, or do you need all the original data? Please let me know, thank you

(0) 讚！ | 太山昌盛

How are you doing? Have you been rejected, or do you need to withdraw your submission on your own?

(0) 讚！ | 月河子武

Is there any follow-up on this? I have been in this state for over a month

(0) 讚！ | 水月宏逸

Is one reviewer for this magazine enough? It's been over a month since we received one reviewer report and I'm going crazy

(0) 讚！ | 气甲忻愉

Hello, do you need the original data for all qPCR and staining images in the paper or just for WB?

(0) 讚！ | 努力啊大敏叡

Hi, Uu, may I ask what this status is? After the technical review, it will be peer-reviewed for 10 days. I'm not sure if it has been sent for review yet

(0) 讚！ | 平原觅雁

I don't need the entire film, but I usually keep at least 2-3 markers of the original film of this strip

(0) 讚！ | axiang4u

Hello, do we need to provide the full script as supplemental material for submitting data to WB?

(0) 讚！ | 水立方661

Submitted on June 25th, it wasn't until July 26th that an editor was assigned. On August 2nd, 18 reviewers were invited, with the first reviewer quickly taking on the task and the second reviewer accepting on the 6th. On August 23rd, feedback was received from one reviewer, followed by the second on September 1st. However, the editor did not respond until September 22nd, requesting major revisions. One reviewer had few and easily answerable questions, while the other posed 3 pages of questions, but overall was quite courteous. After a thorough one-month revision, including 4-5 additional experiments, the manuscript was revised on October 22nd. On October 24th, the journal invited the two reviewers again, and the article was accepted on November 1st. The second reviewer praised the high quality of our revisions

(0) 讚！ | axiang4u

I have opinions, too

(0) 讚！ | 俊美小哥哥

Full membrane

(0) 讚！ | 北海孤松

OP, are you ready to be assigned to an editor for this step? I submitted on the 12th and it showed peer review on the 13th, but there is still an interface showing "Ready to be assigned to an editor" continuously. I don't know if it has been sent for review or if it is waiting for an editor to be assigned

(0) 讚！ | Jason

1. Submission received on 27 Dec 2022; submission under peer review on 28 Dec 2022; major revision on 25 Mar 2023 (requested 14 days for revision, extended for 3 months for additional experiments); revision received on 25 Jun 2023; submission accepted on 05 Jul 2023.
2. The external review process in the first three months was quite challenging, but the feedback from the experts was objective. If conditions allow, it is advisable to supplement experiments. Overall, this journal is relatively efficient. If the level of innovation is insufficient, the paper may be rejected in about a month. The speed of acceptance of the modified article and preprint publication is quite fast, and the future looks promising

(0) 讚！ | 雨的停留

Does the WB need a whole film?

(0) 讚！ | 八荒淑哲

Do I need to submit the entire film for submission to WB?

(0) 讚！ | 八荒淑哲

Does this magazine require a full page ad?

(0) 讚！ | 八荒淑哲

Have you provided the WB membrane image? Thank you

(0) 讚！ | 八荒淑哲

Do you need to submit the whole blood film image?

(0) 讚！ | 八荒淑哲

Hello, does the raw material WB need a full film? Or is the WB raw data sufficient?

(0) 讚！ | 八荒淑哲

Does the whole sheet of film need to be repeated? Or is one sheet enough?

(0) 讚！ | 八荒淑哲

Do you need the whole-brain membrane map?

(0) 讚！ | 八荒淑哲