How is everything going? I am also like that

(0) 讚！ | 重阳春兰

The editor assigned hasn't changed for over a week, what's going on?

(0) 讚！ | 璃沙军强

Why do they say I don't meet the author's requirements? Is it because my submission format is incorrect?

(0) 讚！ | 雾都从露

What kind of article are you looking for?

(0) 讚！ | 东海春兴

What type of article are you?

(0) 讚！ | 东海春兴

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 75.0
Focused research area: Neuro-oncology
Experience sharing: The speed is very fast, received a lot of feedback in about 2 weeks after the first review, and accepted the revisions quickly. Many thanks to the kind reviewers!

(0) 讚！ | 东海忆秋

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 95.0
Experience sharing: The official website says the first review takes 20 days. I submitted on February 26th and received editor feedback on March 5th. The first review only took one week. There were no major revisions, and I resubmitted on March 6th. The paper was accepted on March 7th, just two days later. It only took 10 days from submission to acceptance. Is this journal unable to find high-quality submissions? The efficiency is very high

(0) 讚！ | 水月悦洋

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission success rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: There are a lot of articles in a year, hundreds of articles in a month, but the review process is slow

(0) 讚！ | Ingemar Beerbohm

Any results? How long until we get results?

(0) 讚！ | 残月从露

How long have you waited for the result?

(0) 讚！ | 残月从露

Has anyone here applied recently? It's been a week since I submitted my application, and it hasn't been processed yet. How long does it usually take?

(0) 讚！ | 坠星鸿宝

How long does it take for the editing to be done? It has been over a week

(0) 讚！ | 坠星鸿宝

How slow is it? Should I invest in it or not?

(0) 讚！ | 筑阳小静

A magazine that is not recommended at all. The editorial level of the magazine is too low and lacks professionalism. The level of the reviewers they found is simply unacceptable. Reading the comments can be frustrating. They don't even know the basic international evaluative standards in the relevant field, but they still review articles? Moreover, they don't even read the manuscripts carefully, they just look at the figures and tables and give opinions. Most of the questions raised have clear and detailed explanations in the article. Three reviewers, one suggesting revisions, one not even reading the article and giving an unequivocal comment, and the other one having no knowledge of the research field. The editors themselves lack even the most basic professional knowledge, just following the reviewers' opinions. I have submitted two articles and both have been handled in this way. Speechless

(0) 讚！ | Elvira Eva

It is the least recommended journal. The level of the journal’s editor is low, and he is not professional at all. The level of the reviewers found is low. Reading comments can make you crazy. Can those who don’t know the most basic international guideline evaluation standards in related fields review articles? Comments were made after reading the figures and tables, without reading the manuscript carefully. Most of the questions raised were clearly explained in the article. There were 3 reviewers, and one of them suggested to revise. One of them gave a meaningless comment without reading the manuscript. The other one had no knowledge of research related fields at all. The editor did not even have the minimum professional knowledge, and process it according to the reviewers’ comments. I have submitted 2 articles, and both are like this. Speechless.

(0) 讚！ | laerve

Review Speed: 1.0
Experience Sharing: Highly not recommended journal. The editorial level of the journal is too low and lacks professionalism. The level of reviewers they find is simply unacceptable. Reading the comments can be frustrating. They don't even know the most basic international evaluative standards in the relevant field, yet they still review articles? Moreover, they don't carefully read the manuscripts, just look at figures and tables to provide feedback. Most of the issues raised have clear explanations in the article. Three reviewers, one suggested revisions, one didn't even read the article and just made a vague comment, and the other one had no knowledge of the research field. The editor lacks even basic professional knowledge and just follows the reviewers' opinions. I submitted two articles, and both were the same. Speechless

(0) 讚！ | 风陵白竹

One word, slow

(0) 讚！ | Oliver Jerry

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: Submitted an article on brain tumor, rejected after 1 month of review, but received many valuable comments from 4 experts, still grateful

(0) 讚！ | 飞月天悦

How is the article coming along? People say this magazine is slow, is it true? 136****7697 (no alias) 2016-02-16 10:02:00 post: What does "reviews completed" mean? How much longer will it take to get a response? It's been three months!!!!

(0) 讚！ | 蒙德颖昕

Editor assignment pending, still in this state after a month

(0) 讚！ | 玉卿姑娘

Solve::::editor assignment pending, after one month, this state ah

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: Help needed: editor assignment pending, turned into under review after a month, what's going on??

(0) 讚！ | Victoria Grey

Solve::::editor assignment pending, become Under review after one month, what??

(101) 讚！ | Anonymous

Is there a layout fee?

(0) 讚！ | 仲夏和颂

What does "reviews completed" mean? How much longer will it take to hear back? It's been three months already!!!

(0) 讚！ | Marina Bowman