Is it under review?

(0) 讚！ | 球球了想读博

May 12, 2024 Submitted to Journal
May 12, 2024 With Editor

(0) 讚！ | 球球了想读博

I submitted another article, it has been over a month with the editor, what's going on? It has become so slow, even when I send emails to urge for the manuscript, there is no response.

(0) 讚！ | liuSTU

The review speed was extremely poor, with the first review taking nearly a year. During this period, I contacted the editor and chief editor numerous times. The chief editor passed the responsibility to the editor, who ignored my emails. In the end, I had no choice but to withdraw the paper. The chief editor replied, "I am sorry that the previous editor did not complete the review of this paper. I will be carrying out the rest of the review of your paper."

The opinions of the two reviewers did not contribute significantly to improving the quality of the paper. The chief editor rejected it, and I subsequently submitted it to another journal, where it was accepted.

(2) 讚！ | Roderick0226

Submitted in mid-May, the first review was in early August with four reviewers. Two accepted directly, one suggested minor revisions, and one suggested major revisions. The editor provided feedback for the minor revisions, which were sent back in early September. Accepted on October 7th, the process was quick. Previously, the paper was submitted to mathematical journals such as AMM and AMC, as well as operations research journals like COR, but all were rejected by the editors. This time, it was submitted to a computer science journal, and the process went smoothly.

(0) 讚！ | liuSTU

Still use LaTeX, when resubmitting there is an option in the submission system to view, actually everything is written quite clearly.

(0) 讚！ | Yellow

Thank you, and sorry to bother you again. Currently, the journal has replied to me that they require a revised version for further review. May I ask if the revised manuscript should be uploaded in Word or LaTeX format? Because when I used LaTeX for the initial draft, the text on each page was sparse, which resulted in several additional pages. Additionally, the initial review comments stated, "We cannot accommodate PDF manuscript files for production purposes." So, I was wondering if they prefer Word manuscripts instead? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | 森7

It has been quite a while. If the review comments are to revise, with proper modifications, it should be acceptable.

(0) 讚！ | Yellow

Thank you very much. So, if I understand correctly, your first trial also lasted for half a year? Do you feel this publication is good? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | 森7

Answer the question above, this journal's review process is quite slow. I have two reviewers, and one of them always delays giving their review opinions until the very end, taking about three months. My article has been reviewed for a total of one and a half years, with four revisions. If you are in a hurry for results, you might need to reconsider. However, if you are not in a hurry, the quality of this journal is still acceptable.

(0) 讚！ | Yellow

I have been submitting to JNCA for half a year and still haven't received any results. Is this normal? Thank you! At 4 months, I asked the editor and they said there were still opinions from 2 reviewers pending. Now it has been 6 months and there is still no news.

(0) 讚！ | 森7

I personally feel that this journal has a lot of reviewers. In my experience, there were no less than 6. The comments raised were very detailed, many and sharp as well. The requirements for the grammar of the article are very high; the editor also pays high attention to the formulas and symbols; some minor errors can also be found. The review time is okay. However, several times of revision were required, and it seems that the time has become very long recently. This journal is a well-known journal in the industry and a top journal with great influence.

(8) 讚！ | 云隐私信任

It is my first time to submit a manuscript to this journal, with the attitude of having it a try. I submitted the manuscript at the end of May 2020, and the comments of the first review were returned in two months. Seven reviewers were invited and the comments of five reviewers were returned. Judging from the personal experience of article publication, I feel that there were too many reviewers. There are usually about 4 reviewers for journals like Trans. After a month of revision, the revised manuscript was uploaded in early September, and it was soon sent for review. The notice of acceptance was received on September 25. It took nearly 4 months from submission to acceptance, which can be calculated as a very quick journal. The editor-in-chief is very efficient! Worthy of praise! I wish the journal will be better and better! It is said that the journal is a well-known and influential journal in the field of computer and network. And it is a Tsinghua University recommended journal in computer science category B. The editor-in-chief is very capable. In his early years, he had independently-finished article published in IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, and top journals in the communication field such as IEEE Communications Magazine, IEEE Communications Surveys

(21) 讚！ | 小崔说事

Fortunately, I had 2 articles accepted by this journal. It took 8 months on average before acceptance. There were three reviews and two revisions. I was exhausted and hard-working in each revision. The requirements were very strict, the review was very strict, and the quality was high. It deserves to be a top journal. The overall feeling is that it is much more difficult than IEEE Access, and it took a long time. The journal has very high grammar requirements, and the articles need to be polished by a professional team!

(0) 讚！ | 云隐私信任

In June 2018, the first draft was submitted. After 2 months, the revised comments were returned. After revision, the revised draft was submitted. After 2 months, the second review was returned and directly acceptd.The journal has systematic requirements for the theory and experiment of the thesis, and the quality of the publication is very good.

(0) 讚！ | bit_hwj2016

715 is submitted out, and the review is reviewed on September 20, and the notice is accepted on December 2.A total of four and a half months, it is fast.

(2) 讚！ | anonymous

The initial review more than 5 months to reply to the news, overhaul, repaired after 1 month, received after 3 months, about 10 months before and after.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Excuse me, this journal has not selectd for this year or last year, how is his situation, thank you!Note: The journal has six issues per year, one for every two months, and about 34 papers per issue.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Very standard, old-fashioned journals,No hype if. Very early is more than 1 o'clock, still!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

This is a well-known journal in the field of computers and networks. It is very influential, and the review is standard. I am fortunate to have one of my papers accepted. The review period was more than 5 months. I was required to return minor revisions within 2 months, and the paper was accepted within 1 month after the revision. Personally, I think that it is a very good publication.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名