May I ask how many submission numbers have you reached now?

(0) 讚！ | HUANG 黄

The LaTeX template used is the Elsevier single-column template.

(0) 讚！ | lllll1212

Do you have a Word template? I can't find it in the author's guidelines.

(0) 讚！ | iu1

Mar 02, 2025 Required Reviews Completed 
However, only one reviewer's feedback has been received, not sure why.

(0) 讚！ | lllll1212

Feb 26, 2025 Under Review

(0) 讚！ | lllll1212

February 22, 2025 With Editor

(0) 讚！ | lllll1212

Is there any news now?

(0) 讚！ | lllll1212

What does it mean to decide the process after investing three or four days?

(0) 讚！ | zhong中

The number has reached 2500, despair...

(0) 讚！ | KSS

Submitted on August 25th, after one round of revisions, accepted on December 3rd, taking three months in total.

(0) 讚！ | Candy1111

Are you using single column or double column?

(0) 讚！ | YueShudan

Looking forward to it

(0) 讚！ | chtong

Aug 01, 2024 With Editor

(0) 讚！ | ceYSY

How long has the status of "with editor" changed?

(0) 讚！ | 陌妍

Is it under review?

(0) 讚！ | 球球了想读博

May 12, 2024 Submitted to Journal
May 12, 2024 With Editor

(0) 讚！ | 球球了想读博

I submitted another article, it has been over a month with the editor, what's going on? It has become so slow, even when I send emails to urge for the manuscript, there is no response.

(0) 讚！ | liuSTU

The review speed was extremely poor, with the first review taking nearly a year. During this period, I contacted the editor and chief editor numerous times. The chief editor passed the responsibility to the editor, who ignored my emails. In the end, I had no choice but to withdraw the paper. The chief editor replied, "I am sorry that the previous editor did not complete the review of this paper. I will be carrying out the rest of the review of your paper."

The opinions of the two reviewers did not contribute significantly to improving the quality of the paper. The chief editor rejected it, and I subsequently submitted it to another journal, where it was accepted.

(2) 讚！ | Roderick0226

Submitted in mid-May, the first review was in early August with four reviewers. Two accepted directly, one suggested minor revisions, and one suggested major revisions. The editor provided feedback for the minor revisions, which were sent back in early September. Accepted on October 7th, the process was quick. Previously, the paper was submitted to mathematical journals such as AMM and AMC, as well as operations research journals like COR, but all were rejected by the editors. This time, it was submitted to a computer science journal, and the process went smoothly.

(0) 讚！ | liuSTU

Still use LaTeX, when resubmitting there is an option in the submission system to view, actually everything is written quite clearly.

(0) 讚！ | Yellow

Thank you, and sorry to bother you again. Currently, the journal has replied to me that they require a revised version for further review. May I ask if the revised manuscript should be uploaded in Word or LaTeX format? Because when I used LaTeX for the initial draft, the text on each page was sparse, which resulted in several additional pages. Additionally, the initial review comments stated, "We cannot accommodate PDF manuscript files for production purposes." So, I was wondering if they prefer Word manuscripts instead? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | 森7

It has been quite a while. If the review comments are to revise, with proper modifications, it should be acceptable.

(0) 讚！ | Yellow