The manuscript was rejected after two and a half months of peer review

(0) 讚！ | Hardere

Editor assigned up to now

(0) 讚！ | Carr Lamb

Great, another revised statement, now they want to put the exemption of informed consent in the statement, ridiculous, this technical review is so poor

(0) 讚！ | Hardere

The new submission has been almost 21 days, which is too slow

(0) 讚！ | Carr Lamb

Hello, how long did it take for your new submission? My submissions have been new since January 15th

(0) 讚！ | Carr Lamb

Review speed: 24.0 | Submission success rate: 5.0
Experience sharing: Too slow, not even sure if it will reach the editor's desk

(0) 讚！ | Carr Lamb

Submitted on January 15, the 22nd was revised once for formatting, and it is still a new submission. The official website also shows that the first decision will be made in 8 days

(0) 讚！ | Hardere

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: Submitted to this journal at the end of May and received major revision on July 27; revised on August 24, and the status changed to Editor assigned on the same day; on September 3, the status was still Editor assigned, but the date changed. Reviews were assigned on September 10, and the reviewers agreed to a second review. On September 10, it changed to Under review, undergoing external review. On September 12, after 2 days, the status was still Under review, only the time changed. Reviews were completed on September 25 and on October 2, it was Editor assigned for review. The paper was accepted on October 14, and I saw the email on the morning of October 15. What impressed me the most was the major revision, with a total of 3 reviewers. The first reviewer objectively pointed out both major and minor issues in my research, with the biggest revision being the discussion and poor English. The second reviewer was very critical, pointing out negative opinions throughout the article. The third reviewer was more friendly, gave some compliments, provided additional directions after suggestions, and recommended some papers for me to read. I am grateful for the patience of the journal's reviewers and editors and am very happy

(0) 讚！ | Hiram Adolph

How is everyone's new submission speed recently? Why is mine always at new submission?

(0) 讚！ | 江南玲然

Hello, what kind of article are you?

(0) 讚！ | Hiram Adolph

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 75.0
Experience sharing: Submitted in early August 2021, accepted in early November, now it's March 2023, still not online. I have sent 2 emails asking when the proof will be provided, but no one has replied

(0) 讚！ | 晨风新荣

How long does it take from submission to under review?

(0) 讚！ | 巴蜀陶宁

To OA or not to OA, that is the question

(0) 讚！ | 一吃就胖小成济

Where can I find a template for Word?

(0) 讚！ | 一吃就胖小成济

Published four months after reception

(0) 讚！ | 澄静布凡

No layout fee

(0) 讚！ | 澄静布凡

The review process is fast. The revisions were given one month after submission, and returned one week later. After waiting for one more week, it was directly accepted for publication. Overall, it took about two months to be published online.

(0) 讚！ | victory

This varies from person to person. If the main result has been completed, it is generally recommended to start with the result. If the main result is still in progress, you can start with the methods and introduction

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

It is recommended to complete the main results section before starting to write the article. However, you can also start drafting the article as you gather key phenotype data or after you have designed the study

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

At what stage of the experiment is it more appropriate to start writing the article?

(0) 讚！ | 平原文波

What is the general writing sequence of a research article?

(0) 讚！ | Oswald Edie

Same question, how long will it take to be published after submission?

(0) 讚！ | 北风爱梅

Is there a layout fee?

(0) 讚！ | 风啸格菲

Is there a layout fee?

(0) 讚！ | 风啸格菲

Hey, how is the article coming along?

(0) 讚！ | 四风孟菊