Hello, I would like to ask why this journal has been in 'editor assigned' status for almost a week? Was it the same for you at that time?

(0) 讚！ | 20CrMnTi

2022.8.25 Submission
2022.11.7 Major revision with 5-6 questions from each reviewer, giving 3 months' time
2022.12.27 Submission
2023.1.19 Acceptance

(0) 讚！ | choose sing

Nanomaterials

Submitted on June 9, 2021. There was a change in status after about four or five days, indicating that it had been sent for review.

Major revision on July 5, 2021. Two reviewers provided a total of around 10 questions.

Revised manuscript submitted on August 4, 2021. It took almost half a month to come up with a modification plan due to the need for explanations of mechanisms and additional data. It then took over a week to complete the revisions.

Accepted on August 18, 2021.

Overall, the entire process took about two and a half months. Each stage, from submission to editorial handling, took about four or five days. The time from submission to revision was around 20 days. The revision process was relatively slow, taking about a month. Generally speaking, it was considered relatively fast.

(0) 讚！ | 洗洗睡吧

WeChat mini-program has a bug, and I am doing titanium dioxide water treatment.
Submitted on May 9, 2021.
Under review on May 15, 2021.
Reviews completed on June 3, 2021.
First time this fast, hoping for a good result!

(0) 讚！ | oolili

Submitted on June 23 and reviewer comments returned on August 12. A major revision was required. There were two reviewers, and two months for revision was given. It was delayed due to some other things, and we returned it till September 17. Due to the change of the author's order, we received an email on October 19th, requesting to fill in a statement to change the author. Then it was resubmitted. Review comments returned on October 19th, requiring minor revisions, which are all minor issues. It then was returned after finishing the revisions on the same day. Accepted on October 30.

(2) 讚！ | zby

It seems that the journal’s review speed is slow after checking the comments, but I don’t know why it was so fast this time. It should have a lot to do with the assigned reviewers. Specific information: 2019.04.05 Submission; 2019.05.07 Major revision; 2019.05.18 Revised manuscript; 2019.06.01 Acceptance.

(1) 讚！ | Jefferey

The manuscript was submitted on February 21 and sent for review soon. The major revision was notified on April 9, and the revised submission was returned on April 24. Due to the addition of a new author, I received an email on April 26, requesting to fill in a change of author statement. Returned on April 28 and accepted on May 4.

(1) 讚！ | 闪闪啦啦啦

Three months Reviews CompletedI don't know if I should write a letter.

(3) 讚！ | wjj_dyx@162.com

Horrible journal

(0) 讚！ | cce_@live.com

12月2日稿Returning the review comments on December 25, overhaul, two reviewers, opinions are not difficult to replyReturn on January 5Return to review comments on January 13th, minor repairReturn on January 14Accepted on January 16Overall, journals are not very difficult and reception is easy.

(4) 讚！ | 丁香花

12月2日稿Returning the review comments on December 25, overhaul, two reviewers, opinions are not difficult to replyReturn on January 5Return to review comments on January 13th, minor repairReturn on January 14Accepted on January 16Overall, the journal is not very difficult, and it is easy to receive.

(0) 讚！ | 丁香花

12月2日稿Returning the review comments on December 25, overhaul, two reviewers, opinions are not difficult to replyReturn on January 5Return to review comments on January 13th, minor repairReturn on January 14Accepted on January 16Overall, the journal is not very difficult, and it is easy to receive.

(0) 讚！ | 玫瑰

2017.03.22Submission2017.03.29 overhaul (two-month period), six reviewers per person, and four or five experiments....Returning around 2017.06.15Accept directly for about half a month, then proof, online...It's fast, it feels lucky!

(14) 讚！ | 程门立雪

two months out of review comments, directly after the overhaul, 10 days online, very fast, the editor is also very good, will not delay, it is recommended to contribute.

(2) 讚！ | VO2

Indeed, it is slower than other journals. The review period for reviewers is two months. It was given to Xiao Xiu, and it was acceptd in three weeks or so. It was less than four months in total, and the caution of the article was urgent.

(2) 讚！ | lyang65@hotmail.com

Although the tragedy, but the speed is very fast

(0) 讚！ | 啊啊

I think this is relatively lucky insideLa.2 months to give repair advice, October accepted

(0) 讚！ | shanjian8208

6月23SubmissionThe early period was very slow, and it took about a month to submit it for review.Notice of overhaul at the beginning of SeptemberReturn to the revised draft in early OctoberMinor repairs in a few daysReceived on October 23It’s true that other journals should be slower, and seriously consider graduating.

(0) 讚！ | cshcgy

The submission and review process is long, more than 6 months.

(5) 讚！ | aaaa

After submitting the manuscript, review the comments one month later; after the repair, one month to notify the accept;

(2) 讚！ | 939426994@qq.com

has selectd a little more than a month. The four reviewers are all revised, although the quality of the article is not high.However, reviewers are mostly small questions such as citations.After a week of modification, return to go directly after 11 days of accept.Personally, the efficiency is still quite high.

(7) 讚！ | ICEAM

This journal has a lot of reviewers, and there are 10 reviewers in one revision. The questions are very professional, and the trials are supplemented. There are 6 reviewers in the second revision.And the questions raised by each reviewer are very sharp, but it's okay, I finally received it, I don't know when it will be published.In short, the editor is very responsible. Generally, the manuscript is submitted to the manuscript within less than 2 months after the submission. The reviewer of the journal is very rigorous and serious, and hopes that the IF value will increase next year...

(0) 讚！ | yxx_678@163.com

1月30# submission, 2 reviewers, comments in mid-April, overhaul (supplement) spent more than a month, uploading revisions in mid-MayThe manuscript was reviewed for another month and accepted on June 24.I haven't been online yet. I don't know when I can download the online version of the article.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Submitted in January this year, overhauled in April, acceptd in May, the people who affected the factor drop chilled to the end of the paper need to search, the results originally included in the SCII don't know why I searched it in EI. I don't know if there is any reward, and other papers in the same period are included in SCI. It's very strange, how is it going?

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Submitted for half a month, how is Editor Assigned. Is this journal slow?

(0) 讚！ | 匿名