Both are open-source journals, but the user experience is far inferior to MDPI's Nanomaterials.

(0) 讚！ | 铁血越狱

Congratulations, you have been selected as the most unlucky person of the year. Great joy and sorrow, you will surely become a great person in the future!

(0) 讚！ | 白云黄鹤

Trash magazine, before it even got published, surprisingly got removed from SCI. Now we don't even know if we can resubmit, let alone get a refund for the page fees.

(0) 讚！ | swallow.

Before submission, the journal was ranked as a Tier 3 journal. However, when the article was accepted, the journal was downgraded to a Tier 4 journal by the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The quality of the article was satisfactory, with three reviewers suggesting revisions throughout the process. The first round of revisions addressed the questions raised by the reviewers, but one of the reviewers requested additional experiments and the provision of raw data, such as flow cytometry data. Although the literature search was conducted and supplemented, no additional experiments were performed. However, the response was comprehensive, and the reviewer considered it acceptable, but raised other concerns. Overall, it was not an easy process.

(0) 讚！ | swallow.

Mine too, may I ask which journal you submitted to?

(0) 讚！ | liumengya

I feel the same. I have been submitting for 3 months already. I asked the editor a couple of days ago and was told that they haven't found a reviewer yet. What kind of speed is this? It's supposed to be an open-access journal!

(0) 讚！ | 卓

major revision after 3 weeks, but 6 months to send the second revision and more than 2 months to send the next status.

(0) 讚！ | author

I do research in nanomaterials. If the article was successfully submitted, it will show under review. The status had not changed again since then. After more than 2 months, I emailed and asked, and I was told it was not sent for review. I really don’t know how this open-access journal was managed. I should withdraw the article as soon as possible.

(0) 讚！ | zzu环

paid journals!It’s still easy, reviewing for a month and a half, and receiving it two days after the repair!

(1) 讚！ | mount

selectd seven or eight journals, and finally accepted!A total of one and a half months, thanks to nanomaterials!

(0) 讚！ | mliu

12月17#, all kinds of author information confirmed, January 17No. It was submitted to the trial. The results of the first trial on March 13th have not yet come down. I sent an email asking the editor to say that I am still tall. The speed is too slow. I don’t know how long it will take, and the result is unknown.

(1) 讚！ | Troy

Submission was rejected for one and a half months. It was very troublesome to start submitting various confirmation emails, but I still replied to the editorial requirements one by one, and then entered the review draft. After more than one month, I refused to submit the manuscript.The draft opinion actually has two sentences. First, it meets the requirements of the journal. Second, the article lacks innovation.It’s really drunk, it’s been a long time, and no innovation is not fixed at first.

(1) 讚！ | bbb

Is it a three-zone or a four-zone?

(7) 讚！ | 1

submitted an article on nanomaterials, three reviewers, overhaul.This publication is quite fast, and there are more drafts.The impact factor has grown a bit this year.2013 IF 1.547.If the data is average, you can consider submiting and trying.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Can you provide the following submission address for this journal?Appreciate it!Thank you

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

is very fast, it is very expensive, and this journal is not in the "well-known academic journals" library, there is no blindness qualification, if2013 is more than 1.3, because it is rightOne of the boss’s invitations was submitted

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Because of the draft, it is processed very quickly!But today I received a 1200 knives fee and is communicating with the editor.The results are updated at any time!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

is estimated to be a guest editor of this journal. I hope this issue is good. This journal is more suitable for nano-related subjects, only to know the page fee, if there is no page fee.Perfect, the last journal is getting better and better, if it is getting higher~

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

After submitting the manuscript, the technical review will be passed soon, and then 2 recommended reviewers and 1 unknown review will be sent.The manuscript is reviewed and the reply is faster. After the minor repair, the reply is accepted within two days.At this point, it was discovered that the fee was 1200 knives. After the application was free, there was no result (only 25% exemption), and the manuscript was requested to be retracted. After one month, the retraction was successful.I will not select for journals in the future (except science)

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The older the fee, the higher the price, the 1200USD, the quality of the paper is slowly improved, but the group that China has paid for.Too many, the 2011 version of the impact factor dropped to 1.376.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Searched in SCI, the number of articles published in recent years are: 2008 1012009 692010 1432011 247

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

There is no mistake, the layout fee must beUSD 1200, do you want to give up?

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

I selectd in June this year, and it took only one month to confirm acceptance after I went out to modify it.The speed is still fast, but the price is extremely high, it took the boss 900 knife.Looks like not paying the receipt after paying the money.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The review period is slow, and the reviewer is acceptd. The reviewer is also responsible. The tragedy is that after receiving it, I realized that it is an open access journal. I have to pay $750.Not ready to contribute

(0) 讚！ | 匿名