Submitted on August 1st, reviewed within 3-5 days;
First review comments in mid-September;
Reply submitted on October 30th;
Accepted on November 18th.

(0) 讚！ | ryanXc

Thank you to the editor Luca Evangelisti, Ph.D.

(0) 讚！ | ryanXc

Ok, thank you very much.
Yesterday I checked and sent out 13 reviewer invitations, but none have been accepted yet.
The time for "Under Review" has changed twice, probably due to the two times the editor sent out invitations.

(0) 讚！ | 氵弎叶草

The content visible on the Elsevier WeChat mini-program.

(0) 讚！ | 小许许

Hello friend, where can I see the three review invitations that you mentioned the editor sent out?

(0) 讚！ | 氵弎叶草

Hello, I submitted my manuscript on the 15th and it was sent for review on the 18th. So far, only one out of the eight reviewers has accepted. Today, the editor sent out three more review invitations. Is it difficult to find reviewers for this journal?

(0) 讚！ | 小许许

Yes, the change in dates indicates that a reviewer has looked at it.

(0) 讚！ | 一只木瓜

Congratulations

Just want to ask, I was under review on 10.13, and today I checked again, the status is under review on 10.19, does this mean that one reviewer has accepted the review?

Thank you

(0) 讚！ | 氵弎叶草

The paper was submitted to the Journal of Molecular Structure in mid-March, and the reviewer comments were received in early May. The review process was somewhat lengthy, requiring patience. There were three reviewers, one of whom recommended rejection, while the other two suggested minor revisions. One reviewer, likely in the field of crystallography, raised theoretical questions and recommended acceptance after providing supporting evidence. Another reviewer, likely in the field of computational chemistry, requested additional calculations and in-depth analysis. After three rounds of revisions to the computational section, the paper was finally accepted. The multiple revisions were mainly due to my limited experience in computational work, and I learned and supplemented based on the reviewers' feedback. The reviewers' comments were very insightful.

(0) 讚！ | 一只木瓜

I also submitted my manuscript for review on the third day. It was submitted on the 15th, and out of the 7 experts, only one agreed to review it. Now there are 8 reviewers, but still no one agrees. I'm so upset.

(0) 讚！ | 小许许

You are really fast, it has been more than twenty days for me and I am still with editor o(╥﹏╥)o

(0) 讚！ | chungchung

Be patient, everything is normal. This journal usually has at least three reviewers. After submitting my manuscript, it went through seven rounds of review - three were accepted directly, three required revisions (two major revisions and one minor revision), and one was rejected with 17 comments. The editor requested a major revision, and the outcome is still unknown after the second round of revisions.

(0) 讚！ | Shiba

I submitted three papers in total, one of which was to the Chemical Engineering Journal. They mentioned that my article lacked an experimental section, so I felt it was an opportunity to revise. I only added the experimental synthesis steps to reduce the repetition rate and resubmitted. After the revisions were made, I submitted it again, but it was rejected. However, the process was quite fast and did not waste much time.

After that, I submitted to Molecular Catalysis and received a suggestion to transfer to this journal a week later, so I directly transferred.

10.11 submitted
10.13 under review

After submitting, I did not check. On the weekend of the 13th, I checked to see if there was any rejection, and quickly submitted another one. The result was "Under Review," I don't know if there is a similar situation. This should be under review, right?

I would appreciate any guidance from fellow authors who submit to this journal!

(0) 讚！ | 氵弎叶草

Why is it so slow? It's been half a month, still with editor.

(0) 讚！ | chungchung

Correction: External audit is 0718 RRC and 0719 Revised.

(0) 讚！ | 菌的秘密

Colloids and Surface B; Biointerfaces suggested transferring (committed to transferring for review)
2024.0603 submitted to the journal
2024.0604 with editor+under review
2024.0618 rrc
2024.0619 revised (this journal does not distinguish between minor and major revisions, deadline for resubmission is 0917, overall 2 minor revisions, 1 major revision, 1 rejection)
2024.0910 submitted to the journal
2024.0911 with editor+under review
2024.0919 rrc
2024.0919 Accept (same four reviewers as before, three accepted directly, one still rejected, but the editor ultimately gave me a pass)
From writing the initial draft to final acceptance, it took a total of two and a half years. Thank you to JMS, thank you to Editor Saswati Basu. This journal was willing to publish my article, making it the number one journal in my mind. Wishing JMS continued success!

(0) 讚！ | 菌的秘密

The editing speed is very fast, and it is submitted for review the next day. The review results are out in two months, with major revisions, minor revisions, and one very perfunctory revision that is hard to see. A month later, after resubmitting, both reviewers accept it, and it is accepted within a week.

(0) 讚！ | ceciliaaaae

The second reviewer suggested acceptance, but the editor rejected it due to lack of innovation.

(0) 讚！ | AAccepT#

International biomolecular submission, submitted on 1.27, reviewed on 1.30. At the beginning, no one accepted the invitation to review, so the editor logged in once or twice a week to invite new reviewers. By 4.15, three reviewers were invited and completed the review. The feedback in the system was to revise, without specifying whether it was major or minor revisions, and the revision deadline was two months. The reviewers' comments were not harsh, making it relatively easy to make changes. Submitted the revised version on 5.8, and accepted on 5.22

(0) 讚！ | 聚散流沙

A very interesting journal, with comments from four external experts requiring three major revisions and one minor revision. The editor chose to reject it directly, citing lack of innovation

(0) 讚！ | lxk

Submitted for two months, invited 6 reviewers, received responses from 4, still under review!!!

(0) 讚！ | lxk

Fast speed. One review every two months. Accept directly after minor revisions. Online within one day

(0) 讚！ | Heng111

Are you rejected after making revisions required in the first review?

(0) 讚！ | JYYHH

Second zone, the quality of the articles has significantly improved, the difficulty of submission has increased, and it seems that the peer review process has also become much slower than before

(0) 讚！ | wwwyyy9969

Second round, the quality of the articles has significantly improved, and the difficulty of submission has increased

(0) 讚！ | wwwyyy9969