It took nearly five months from submission to acceptance, the peer review process was very slow

(0) 讚！ | yuanzhennihao

Submitted on 9.15, delayed for several days because the corresponding author was not marked
Sent for review on 9.18, with 9 reviewers identified
Around November, one reviewer finally started the review process
After a few days, another reviewer joined, forgot the specific date
Around 11.17, one reviewer's feedback was received
Editor was reassigned
Emailed the editor on 12.4, editor said two reviewers are needed
Major revisions were requested on 12.5
Returned on 12.14
Accepted on 12.24
Thanks to the editor and the journal

(0) 讚！ | 学术小白要加油

The speed is very fast, the review comments are given in two weeks, and the efficiency of the editing teacher is also very high!

(2) 讚！ | 一年级就可萌

Coming soon! 6.30-9.22!

(0) 讚！ | 魏冉

Is this journal a paid one? Can I choose to subscribe or use open access? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | 唯伊HELL

The translation of the given text is: "The speed is fast, and we received the first review in one to two weeks. The feedback is also very pertinent, making it a good journal."

(1) 讚！ | PengWeiHu

A very good journal, I rely on it after graduation.

(114) 讚！ | wqqqee

Submitted in January 20th, with only one reviewer in the process. The initial feedback seemed acceptable, but surprisingly, they were unsatisfied after my response and found various flaws. The editor requested a major revision, and now it has been a year...

(0) 讚！ | JSC

Don’t submit to it. The reviewers’ speed was very fast, but the editor was really bad, I really don’t know what he was doing. Please don’t serve as an editor here and delay other’s work, okay? Nothing happened throughout a month.

(1) 讚！ | 1111111111111111111

Must give a like to JMM, not only for the fast review, but also for the editor who carefully revised the article entirely, which was equivalent to a free proofreading. They are very responsible!

(0) 讚！ | 指望自己

JMM is an established journal in the field of quantitative, and the review speed is also very fast. It was accepted in a little more than 2 months. Those who are anxious to graduate can give it a try. But the operation of JMM is really not flattering. The impact factor is not ideal as well. I hope it can be improved.

(0) 讚！ | 指望自己

The review speed is very fast, and it is online in 3 months, including 1 month modification time.well!

(1) 讚！ | 809044217@qq.com

The most inconspicuous journals that have been reviewed in the middle of the review. If you are preparing for graduation, consider carefully and re-submitment. If you just want to accumulate experience, it is recommended to consider the short review period.#

(8) 讚！ | yy891102

石沉大海

(16) 讚！ | acv21

A journal that feels very painful, and it has not been moved for half a year~ ThenThe review has not responded for half a year~

(38) 讚！ | 1`

What broke the journal? Last year, there was no result in the submission in October.

(22) 讚！ | lcf1028

Reviewed for nearly 6 months..... The result was rejected.... It is said that the innovation is insufficient

(8) 讚！ | yc0826

Edit i is very efficient. The reviewer returns the review comments in less than 20 days. The editor is very responsible and returns any information in time; I am the reviewer of this journal, the editorial requirements of this journal.Each reviewer must return to the reviewer within 20 days...

(4) 讚！ | 匿名

MD research on the structure and activity of biomacromolecules, submitted last December, this year 5At the end of the month, the review comments were given, and on June 11, the revised draft was submitted. So far, no results have been obtained.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Editing is very responsible and the review speed is not slow.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Very fast, DecemberNo. 6 received, accepted: January 2.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

After submitting the manuscript, I gave it a little over a month. At that time, I raised a lot of questions. Some of them were more difficult to answer. I was busy for half a month. The letter of reply was very good (I think Ha)The answer is very fulfilling. Going back, the display status is accepted in the reviewer for one day, and the students who wish other submissions are also successful!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The first review took more than two months. I was really anxious. The reviewer had 10 questions on large issues. Some of the questions were really difficult to answer. At the beginning, I wanted to give up. Finally, I sought help from my professor, and I was able to revise it in a month. I thought the second review would not be fast, but I received an acceptance letter fairly quickly. I was ecstatic.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

My submission has been 20 days, and the status has been assigned by the editor. What is the status of the journal?Know what to say, thank you!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

11 Submitted on April 1st, and returned on May 16th, basically agreed to receive, received one day after minor repair.On June 3rd, the speed of this process is quite fast.But it has been online until March of 12 years, for a full nine months!The whole process is fast and slow, and the editor is very serious and responsible!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名