Jun 01, 2024 submitted
Jun 04, 2024 with editor

Still in the editor's hands on the 17th, feeling anxious

(1) 讚！ | allin

The teacher didn't ask me to revise, but just let me submit it. I hope there will be patient reviewers, this year has been so tough

(0) 讚！ | 灰达也

How are you doing, classmate? I have invited eight reviewers, but no one has accepted the review for two weeks. I am feeling quite anxious

(0) 讚！ | JOJO-

My 21st with editor has been half a month now, and the status hasn't changed

(0) 讚！ | luzhang

The review speed is very fast, the reviewers are very professional, and the article in the Chinese Academy of Sciences' Area 1 is excellent

(0) 讚！ | 下一篇中10分

3.11 submitted
3.24 under review
4.23 major revision with 7 questions from two reviewers
4.24 revise and resubmit
6.4 accept with one reviewer abandoning the review process and the other recommending acceptance, the editor decided to accept. The reviewer who abandoned only raised two questions, one of which was a request for a citation

(0) 讚！ | rufer

As of May 28th, a total of 18 review invitations have been sent out, but none of the reviewers have accepted the invitations. Emails sent to the editors have also not been responded to

(0) 讚！ | Eimasr

Passed out. I was rejected again because I didn't include the reviewers. There has been no news since the 11th of this month... I am so desperate (tears

(0) 讚！ | 白菜上岸

Under review since May 1st, a total of 9 reviewers have been invited so far, but none have accepted the invitation. It's a bit slow, should we send a letter to remind the editor?

(1) 讚！ | Eimasr

Submitted on 11/24/2023
Returned on 1/9/2024, major
Applied for a three-week extension in the revised system on 3/26/2024
On 4/11/2024, major
On 4/16/2024, revised
On 4/28/2024, accepted
Compared to the first fuel, this one took a year, this one is considered fast

(0) 讚！ | martiusyang

It's strange to say, after posting this comment, my status changed to Under Review in the afternoon of the same day

(0) 讚！ | 地势坤

I can't stand it anymore, it's been with editor since 4.12, the date hasn't changed, I'm so worried, I'm so worried, I'll send an email to withdraw the submission, for those who don't need the article urgently, they can wait, maybe around half a year

(1) 讚！ | zhoumu

I'm also number 16 with editor, and I'm still unsure whether to withdraw my submission to other magazines. I looked at the editor information and saw that there are many Indians and Middle Easterners, so I don't want to submit there anymore. I read comments saying that there are still many with editor for more than a month

(0) 讚！ | zhoumu

The submission was made on April 12th, and on the 15th it became "With editor". It is still in this status as of the 24th. Why is it taking so long?

(0) 讚！ | 地势坤

The paper has already been published. How did the reviewers respond to your comments? This is crucial. My opinion is very positive. There were some minor details they asked about, but after making the changes, it was accepted in about a week. Published in 4 days

(0) 讚！ | 加油啊（飞升）

Hello, my situation is that after the second revision, it is still under review by the same reviewer I trust. The reviewer completed the review quickly. However, it has been half a month and the journal is still in the "under review" status. May I ask what the next steps are?

(0) 讚！ | CSU Li

23.11.09 Submission
24.02.10 Return comments Major revision 3 reviewers' comments are quite good
24.02.28 Revision One reviewer refused to review, so a fourth reviewer was sought
24.03.18 Second return of comments Minor revision submitted again the same day
24.04.11 Accepted, took 5 months

(0) 讚！ | ssaml

Received at Editorial Office: 28 Dec 2023
Article revised: 1 Apr 2024
Article accepted for publication: 8 Apr 2024
The editor was very nice, and the reviewers were also very nice. There were two difficult questions, but the reviewers provided suggestions, and the article was modified according to their advice. There were many comments, and the editor gave two months for major revisions. Some experimental data was added, and significant changes were made to the figures and tables as requested by the reviewers, which improved the quality of the article! After about a month and a half, the revised manuscript was returned, and in less than a week, it was accepted directly! I think the reviewers are not trying to make things difficult for the authors; they may just be interested in the issue or want to demonstrate their professional competence. Responding carefully to the reviewers' comments and answering them specifically is important. If it is truly difficult to answer, honesty is still the best policy!

(0) 讚！ | jhhcooi

Just received it, so lucky, only one reviewer, and the feedback is quite positive. But the article was previously submitted to PCCP, two rejections and one acceptance, made major revisions based on the reviewer's comments. Sometimes being rejected may not be a bad thing

(1) 讚！ | 加油啊（飞升）

Received at Editorial Office        25 Oct 2023
Article revised                             29 Jan 2024
Article accepted for publication   24 Mar 2024
The editor was very patient, thank you to the editor and reviewers

(0) 讚！ | 十万光年z

I have always been worried that the submission process would be very slow. However, the feedback came back just two weeks after submission, and overall it took two months to be accepted.
1.24 Submitted to editor
2.6 Under review
2.22 Major revisions
3.13 Revisions requested
3.23 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | haerin

Return for revision on March 19th. Checked the tracking and it's still with the same reviewer. It should have been returned to the original reviewer. The original reviewer gave very positive feedback, no need to conduct additional experiments, just asked for some details. Hopefully it will be accepted soon

(0) 讚！ | 加油啊（飞升）

Congratulations! May I ask if there is an additional reviewer for the first review? I only have one reviewer assigned to mine as well. It has been a month and I haven't received any feedback yet, I'm getting worried

(0) 讚！ | wennn123-

2.10 Returned. The cover letter did not mention recommended reviewers. Submitted. Subsequently, the editor provided 6 reviewers, with only 1 agreeing to review.
3.07 Returned, with feedback from only one reviewer. "The insights gleaned from their work hold significant importance for the wider community. However, some minor issues need to be addressed before acceptance." The issues mentioned were minor, but the editor suggested major revisions. Provided 9 specific questions, all of which were manageable

(0) 讚！ | 加油啊（飞升）

Hello, I also encountered a rejection due to referee issues. I added them in the cover letter but still got rejected. Do I need three foreign referees? Thank you

(0) 讚！ | 阿蔓