How do you know what progress is under review?

(0) 讚！ | Tonyy818

Rejected on April 10th, it took one month. Although it has been under review status the whole time, it has also been through the peer review process. The two editors in the email also gave very constructive feedback. Hope it helps you

(0) 讚！ | 阳光雨露dyd

Submitted on March 5th, still Under Review as of April 7th. Teachers, is it normal to stay in this status before revisions?

(0) 讚！ | 阳光雨露dyd

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Emphasized research direction: COVID-19 Experience Sharing: Submitted one paper, received major revisions, hoping for good luck

(0) 讚！ | 桃花永莲

According to justscience's prediction, this magazine will have no impact factor in June 2024

(0) 讚！ | 仲夏美媛

This bird magazine suddenly soared from a score of 2 to over 20, something fishy must be going on. It's totally a spam magazine, probably will be kicked out of SCI like oncotarget in a few years

(0) 讚！ | 仲夏美媛

Good magazine, can choose non-OA no page charges, I have not paid a penny of page charges, which is much better than paying to publish in Nature Communications

(0) 讚！ | aakaifeung

Have you resubmitted your revised manuscript for review? After one rejection and some minor revisions, the final editor still rejected it. Are you planning to resubmit it after making changes based on the reviewer's feedback? Have you had a similar experience? Any tips on what to pay attention to?

(1) 讚！ | lililililili66

Initial Submission This submission is under consideration and cannot be edited. It has been in this status for more than a week, what does it mean? Has it been reviewed?

(0) 讚！ | 水月尔阳

Have you appealed? Can you resubmit and try again?

(0) 讚！ | 破戒青文

Received, scored 12.7, ranked second in virology journals, some reviewers' suggestions are quite insightful

(9) 讚！ | sdafaefwefwq

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Emphasis on research direction: pharmaceutical experience sharing: My research workload is relatively heavy. The editor gave a major revision and a minor revision, and then accepted it. Overall, the reviewers' comments were very fair, and I also gained some new insights. I have also submitted two articles with smaller workloads, but neither was accepted, so it seems that the journal still has certain requirements for quality. I hope the journal can maintain its rating of 12 points, after all, it is the second-ranked journal in virology

(0) 讚！ | 苍风悦乐

This magazine was not very good to begin with, and it only managed to bump up to a 2 rating. It's only a matter of time before it goes back down. Next year, it will probably be lucky to have a 6. Just look at the quality of the articles above and you'll understand

(0) 讚！ | 晨

Review Speed: 2.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 75.0
Emphasized Research Direction: Experiment; COVID-19; Clinical Experience Sharing: Submitted in October, minor revisions in early December, accepted by the end of December. Overall, the speed is very fast, and the reviewers' comments are constructive

(0) 讚！ | Payne Bryan

If you score more than 12 points, will you be in the top three areas of the Chinese Academy of Sciences? Haha! I did not submit any papers!

(8) 讚！ | 德云小生

Review Speed: 3.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 75.0 Weighted Research Direction: COVID-19; Clinical Experience Sharing: Submitted at the end of August, received major revision comments at the end of September, revised in early November, accepted in early December, online for half a month

(0) 讚！ | 卧龙冷旋

Focused research area: vaccines; COVID-19; virology
Virology Journal is in the second zone of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. It doesn't make sense that you've always been in the third zone of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

(0) 讚！ | 暴风嘉赐

I feel that this journal might move up to the second tier of the Chinese Academy of Sciences or even higher in the future. It could be a good investment to submit to it now!

(0) 讚！ | 德云小生

How long does it take for this magazine to be reviewed?

(0) 讚！ | 一条小威威

Review speed: 2.0 Experience sharing: Returned 1.5 months after submission. Rejection after review. Poor quality of reviews, with two reviewers - one slightly unprofessional and the other simply writing nonsense. The editor did not provide any comments before rejecting. After appeal, only two sentences were replied: besides the reviewers, the editor also evaluated it and found it lacking priority… Someone mentioned before that "the outcome of review also depends on luck"... really feel so, don't know how many points will IF 12 have left next year

(0) 讚！ | 亚瑟参孙

After Zheng Chunfu became the editor of this journal, he published quite a few articles in it! Is Professor Zheng still at Fujian Medical University? It seems like his research has come to a standstill, as he has mostly published review articles in recent years!

(3) 讚！ | 德云小生

Still Zone 3, the Chinese Academy of Sciences is not stupid

(0) 讚！ | 永康小可爱

Excuse me, have you received it later? It's been over two months and I still haven't heard back

(0) 讚！ | 一条小健康

What happened afterwards?

(0) 讚！ | 一条小健康

Yes, received

(0) 讚！ | 暴风嘉赐