Haha, there's some movement! Thanks to the friends in this building

(0) 讚！ | 今天下雨

Huh? It's been a year and still no news. Last year, I received feedback for revisions within two months of submission

(0) 讚！ | Aria0308

No, who said the acceptance rate is 95%? It's unbelievable. Another month of review and the acceptance rate is still 95%. It's ridiculous. Don't deceive those who don't understand. Among colleagues, one was published in a top journal in medical information, and the official acceptance rate is around 20-25%. Also, the review process is very slow. There won't be any changes if you don't urge them. It has been one year and two months for mine. Another colleague's article has been stagnant for 8 months

(1) 讚！ | 今天下雨

Review Version 2023-10-30
Initiated 2023-11-03
Last modified 2023-12-15
Accept Submission 2024-02-03
Published 2024-03-08
The above are the entire timeline of my publication for your reference. I submitted on October 26, 2023. After about two months, I received the review comments, made minor revisions, and was also recommended a Scopus sub-journal. After making the revisions, I clearly stated in the cover letter that I did not wish to transfer to the sub-journal, and emphasized the relevance and significance of the research to JMIR. The submission was accepted the day after it was resubmitted, without further review. During the late-stage editing and polishing process, I took some time due to personal reasons, but the entire team was diligent, responsible, and patient, with prompt responses to communication. Overall, the experience was quite good. My research focus is on health information dissemination

(0) 讚！ | Aria0308

I am over four months old

(0) 讚！ | 风见曜曦

I am four months old

(0) 讚！ | 风见曜曦

How long has it been since you last heard from him/her?

(0) 讚！ | 风见曜曦

Have you received any updates? I am in the same situation, and the last modified time keeps changing. It has been four months

(0) 讚！ | 风见曜曦

The overall speed is too slow

(0) 讚！ | 无冬烨烨

Have you received any updates? I am in the same situation, and the last modified time keeps changing

(0) 讚！ | 仙灵歌云

Have you received any updates? I am in the same situation, and the last modified time keeps changing

(0) 讚！ | 仙灵歌云

Is there any friend who knows that the "last modified" in the system refers to the feedback coming back for rework?

(0) 讚！ | 碧水建利

Review speed: 12.0 | Submission success rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: The current review cycle is very slow. I submitted in August 23, 2021, and the external review seemed to be very fast. The external review was completed in 2 months, and then waited for the results of the external review for almost a month. I sent an email in the system to urge, and then at the end of November, I was given a revision level C. Within a month, the revision was completed and re-review status started, continuing until now, it has been 3 months. I have sent three emails in the system to inquire the status, but there has been no reply. This is forcing me to pay for expedited fees. $900 is not worth it

(0) 讚！ | 代蓝姑娘

I started investing in August last year, and returned it for repair at the end of December. It has been in the in re-review status for three months now, and I have been reminded three times in the system, but have never received a response

(0) 讚！ | 代蓝姑娘

You are almost like me, it's been three months in the rereview status. How are you doing now?

(0) 讚！ | 代蓝姑娘

It's an external audit, but it's really slow

(0) 讚！ | 代蓝姑娘

Do not submit to this journal, it is an absolute money trap. After submitting, they quickly review and send it to external reviewers after 3 months. In total, they found 4 reviewers. Three of them were very satisfied with the paper with few comments, while one had more comments. After making all the revisions, the second round of reviews resulted in all experts agreeing to publish the paper. However, the editor rejected the paper, claiming it did not align with the journal's focus. If it didn't fit the journal’s focus in the first round, why send it for review? It wasted six months of time and kept suggesting submission to a subsidiary journal with no impact factor, which completely tarnished their reputation

(0) 讚！ | xiazhi123

Could you please let me know if the fee for Express Lane is paid when submitting a contribution? How much is the fee?

(0) 讚！ | Jerry888

I have been waiting for 2 months, do you have any news now?

(0) 讚！ | 深渊丝雨

Is this magazine "in review" in the hands of the editor, or is it under external review?

(0) 讚！ | 风见曜曦

Real experience, just got rejected. I submitted in early July and used the fast track option. The first two times were minor revisions, and I received a lot of suggestions which I diligently addressed. The last time was also a minor revision, with no suggestions, just a question of whether I would be willing to transfer to a non-SCI sub-journal, I refused, and then got rejected. It's really torturous. Some people get accepted very quickly, but I feel the need to share my experience with everyone, for reference. Why were there only minor revision suggestions all along, but in the end rejected just because I refused to transfer? I really can't understand!!!!!

(263) 讚！ | 阿达萨达是紧挨爱打架

Hello, I haven't received any updates on my second review, so I contacted the editor at support@jmir.org. The next day, the editor replied and stated that the reviewer had no comments and supported publication. However, the editor requested a minor revision and mentioned a limitation that may not meet JMIR's requirements, suggesting I submit to a sub-journal. Have you encountered this situation before, and can I refuse to submit to the sub-journal? Thank you

(0) 讚！ | BetaPower

Hello, may I ask if your repair level is B or C?

(0) 讚！ | Jessie Anna

Please expedite or write a letter to Cui

(0) 讚！ | 良哲mm

It's just disappointing. It's been almost nine months since I submitted my paper, and after various waiting periods, the reviewers all agreed. But the final editor said, "I think your approach is not rigorous enough," and transferred it. The funniest part is that the journal it was transferred to is actually edited by the same editor who rejected it. Wasn't my article good enough? Why transfer it to a journal edited by the same person?

(0) 讚！ | Burnell ONeil