The first article, JMCB, 12.28 submission, 1.19 received minor repair notice, 1.23 submitted revised draft, received on the same day, too efficient, give great praise

(1) 讚！ | 慕子dy

Is JMC a recent increase in the number of manuscripts, and there has been no news since the 10.24 select.What happened? Ask the gods for advice. Recently, I have been rejected.Heart tired ah

(2) 讚！ | 期待毕业的小硕

September 30 submission, November 15th, return to review comments, minor repairs, one week later, repaired the next day to receive.But now there are no influence factors and partitions. It depends on it, and it has to continue to work hard.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

9.21 submitted, reply No. 10.14, overhaul.In the middle of the test, a TOEFL test, a GRE chem test, 11.6 re-submitment, 11.20 accepted.The efficiency is still quite high.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

10 The submitment on the 17th has been under review for 40 days without news!It doesn't feel like you are so fast, is it a tragedy!!!!!

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

Generally speaking, the impact factor of a journal is positively related to the immediate impact factor (in fact, it is the impact factor, but the time included is different).The immediate impact factors for 2013.11.21 of several mainstream material journals in 2013 are: J mater Chem A: 0.87; J mater Chem B: 0.55; J mater Chem C: 0.66; Chem Commun: 0.80; Nanoscale: 0.76; JPCC: 0.50;RSC adv:0.39;

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

The third article in the period of Xiaoshuo, began to select Chem Mater was rejected, did not submit for trial, changed to JMCA, the efficiency is a mess, from submission to acceptanceTo a month.On October 24th, the manuscript was submitted. On November 12th, he received the review comments and overhauled. However, the reviewers' questions were better. Answered on the 18th. On the 22nd, they accepted the Date Submitted: 24-Oct-2013Major Revision.: (12-Nov-2013)a revision has been submitted:18-Nov-2013Accept :(22-Nov-201

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

25-Sep-2013,submitted21-Oct-2013,major revision14-Nov-2013,revised18-Nov-2013,accepted, Nima This speed is enough, less than two months before and after,The first one, too lucky, I wish the comrades high ~ Zhong ah

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

November 4th contribution, the next day to receive the license to submit, the status after the submission is under review, untilI haven't changed it yet, and then follow up on the dynamics, I hope I can have good luck!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

just got a JMC A, submitted it on September 29th, and returned the review comments on October 21st. A minor repair, a rejection, the arbitration gave a major repair, and the result was edited.Overhaul, the revised manuscript was uploaded on November 7th. After 2 hours, the editor received it directly, published online, 40 days before and after, really fast!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

One trial agreed to a small change, the other refused, and the editor gave a re-attend.After two weeks of editing, the editor gave the big change.I will select again after 10 days and accept it in the afternoon.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

selectd for two weeks and directly told me that there was no trial, there was a feeling of being pitted

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

1 more than one month was acceptd, feeling satisfied

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

's previous submitment in JMCA was amazing. The manuscript was published to the overhaul and finally published online for 1 month. This time, somehow, it was more than 50 days. There is still no result. Anxiously waiting for

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

This year I selectd for two JMCA articles, one communication, one full paper. The first one was submitted on December 5, 12, and on the lithium battery article, the editor selected lou, and the review comments were returned on December 26.Two reviewers suggested minor repairs, a journal that suggested rejection of the impact factor, and the editor gave it to Xiao Xiu.I modified some of the article's minor problems and seriously responded to the reviewer who gave the rejection comments, explaining the advantages of our materials.On January 10, 2013, the return draft was submitted and received directly on January 17.The speed is naturally fast, nothing is said, and the editor is also very nice.The second article was submitted in May, which was about photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants. At that time, the submitment of nanos

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

was submitted to JMCB, and two overhauls were performed before and after. One reviewer always asked for additional experiments..However, it has already graduated, and now it is more abroad, it is really unable to meet the requirements of reviewers.I had to talk about the situation. In addition, it was not necessary to ask the manuscripts of the next reviewer to make up the experiment. The result was accepted smoothly after one month.Thanks to Dal-Hee Min for editing, really very Nice.After the publication, it seems that A is going to be hot, and I hope that B can also obtain a better impact factor.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I will return the first JMC A September 10 submission on September 20, twoThe reviewer gave comments on Minor September September and returned to the revised draft on September 25th. Successfully received the submission experience: very efficient, the same speed, the editor is very friendly, and the reviewer is serious and responsible, and the revised comments are very fair.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

8Submission on the 9th of September, back on September 5th, there are two reviewers, one is overhaul, and the other is no need to re-examine.After the revision on September 18th, it will be submitted, and will be accepted on September 27th!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

This is my first post.After submitting JMC-B, there was a reply in about 25 days, minor repair.The article has now received a formal letter of acceptance.In general, it is quite straightforward.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

I am doing surface Raman spectroscopy enhancement, submitted JMC-A, 30 days to reply, met the world's top big cattle, directly rejected, another reviewer suggestedMinor repairs, then arbitration, the arbitration made some suggestions, did not say the specific overhaul or minor repairs, the results of the editor directly to the rejection.Da Niu gave a lot of revision opinions, which really helped me in my future work.Maybe because the boss has too few articles on JMC, there is no influence, so the editor gave the rejection.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The JMC-a selectd for the first time for one month, three reviewers for a minor repair, one manuscript, and finallyOne may be the overhaul of the arbitration, and the final editor gave the rejection and resubmission. The reviewer's opinion of the manuscript is more difficult to do, so the data is changed for a long time, and it feels more tired than writing the article. It is directly accepted 20 days after the re-entry., still quite happy, the first article

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The article returned to the review comments 3 weeks after the select, a minor repair only a few English words required to modify, a major repair,Edit to overhaul.After the revision, he selectd again, and the editor returned to the second overhaul reviewer. The result was rejected and was very depressed.It was the first time that I encountered a situation after being modified.I regret very much that I should make a good change in the overhaul. I will do the experiment as required (although the reviewer asks for a bit of nonsense), I blame myself for not paying attention to it, thinking that the general situation will be accepted after the modification, and I missed my first JMC.Opportunity, now regrets.I hope that everyone can learn from my lessons, and must be carefully revised according to the requirements of the reviewers, even if they are unreasonable.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

JMC B selectd, submitted for 10 days, edited and rejected the letter, I'm sorry to say that on this occasion your paper will not be submitigated further because it is not sufficient impact to appealTo our readership. Let me switch to RSC advances, no need to resubmit the manuscript, the editor directly to the editorial department, I am too troublesome to select, just let him transfer to RSC advances, now half a month, no news yet

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Nano white light material, JMCC.One month to modify the comments, a minor repair, a major repair, let the assembly into a led device.Edit to overhaul.One month assembly plus device test, return, and then under review for three weeks to accept.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Communication written on August 2nd submission Cambridge editorial department returned to the two minor editors on August 20th, let Xiao Xiao repaired the editor for another 2 days and sent back a review opinion.The review comments also responded to the August 30th editor's reminder to commit the revised draft as soon as possible on September 1st. The revised draft was received on the 2nd.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名