The journal took a month to review my submission, and the reviewers gave some trivial comments before rejecting it. After I made revisions and resubmitted, the editor and reviewers dragged their feet for another two months, only to dismiss me with two superficial comments taken from the initial review. Overall, the journal feels slow and the reviewers are not responsible

(1) 讚！ | tangpingzhe

Submitted regular paper

(0) 讚！ | Dr Li

The review you submitted?

(0) 讚！ | 我愿潇洒如鹰

Update: We have already recruited more than 80 reviewers, impressive!

(0) 讚！ | Dr Li

2023.12.12 submit
2023.12.13 with editor
2023.12.20 under review
2023.12.28 major revision
2023.12.30 resubmit
2024.1.9    accepted

(0) 讚！ | 我愿潇洒如鹰

It has been almost a month since submission, and over 20 reviewers have been contacted, but still no one is willing to review the manuscript. Why not use recommended reviewers instead?

(2) 讚！ | Dr Li

Is this journal slow to find reviewers?

(0) 讚！ | Dr Li

Damn it, after three months of working with the editor, the results of the magneto-rheological fluid were rejected as soon as a revision was requested

(0) 讚！ | zwx.

The editorial department rejected it and recommended submission elsewhere

(0) 讚！ | 你身上有他的氨水味

Submitted a review
2023.5.30 submitted to journal & with editor
2023.5.31 under review
2023.8.5 minor revision
2023.8.15 resubmit
2023.8.20 accept

Selected Atsufumi Hirohata as the editor, who is very kind and works very fast. He makes decisions almost as soon as he receives the submission, and it feels like he is working even on weekends

(0) 讚！ | Jackson_M

Please advise on how to avoid Chinese editors. I seek guidance.

(0) 讚！ | 科研小白

Do not ever hire Chinese editors. Firstly, they are extremely slow and completely ignore your articles. Secondly, they don't even bother to read the content and simply skim through the ending to reject your submission, recommending an article that is completely unrelated. Definitely avoid choosing Chinese editors.

(0) 讚！ | 纽哈

How to write the reference format for the manual?

(1) 讚！ | will@gf

2022.10.25 Submission
2022.12.01 Major revision
2022.12.22 Revised
2023.01.09 Accepted

(2) 讚！ | 交大德布劳内

More than a week has passed and it is still being edited in hand.

(0) 讚！ | zui清风

2022.5.10 submission
2022.6.02 under review until now

(1) 讚！ | 科研的笨鸟

The editor is very responsible, and the review process is fast.
There are two reviewers, one of whom is very responsible and raised many questions. After submission, a minor issue was raised during the second review, but it was quickly addressed after submitting a response. Thank you to the reviewers and the editor.

(0) 讚！ | dreamint

Submitted on August 18, 2021
Received major revision comments on October 6, 2021
Supplemented experiments and tests on December 4, 2021, and returned for major revisions
Received minor revision comments on December 31, 2021
Returned after minor revisions on January 16, 2022
Notification of acceptance on January 21, 2022
Both reviewers raised very professional and in-depth questions, which, although painful during the revision process, indeed helped improve the paper.

(0) 讚！ | sharkfish

May I ask everyone, the submission status is currently under review, and the starting time changes every one or two days. What could be the reason for this?

(0) 讚！ | 嘀哩哩哒哒

This is an established journal, how can it be downgraded to the fourth tier?

(0) 讚！ | 简简单单

Two reviewers, very professional, accepted after a major revision, totaling 4 months.
Jul 25, 2021 - Submitted to journal
Oct 16, 2021 - Major revision
Oct 30, 2021 - With Editor
Nov 03, 2021 - Under Review
Nov 11, 2021 - Accept

(0) 讚！ | 飞翔的声音

April 19, 2021 - Submitted
August 5, 2021 - Review comments
September 18, 2021 - Submitted revised manuscript
October 9, 2021 - Accepted
October 19, 2021 - Available online

(0) 讚！ | 长风

May I ask how long it usually takes with the editor? It has been almost a week and it is still "with".

(0) 讚！ | 初学者

The review process is quite fast. The editor is also very patient.

(0) 讚！ | Runnable

The article was reviewed very quickly, and the reviewer's comments were returned in about three weeks. The editor requested major revisions, and after careful modification, the article was accepted directly. The return of the reviewer's comments was also astonishingly fast. It was my first submission, and I was lucky to receive such a quick response. The process was difficult, but the outcome is very satisfying. I would like to thank the editor, Marcelo Knobel.

Received: 1.24
Decision: 2.19
Revised: 3.25
Accepted: 3.30
Online: 4.8

(29) 讚！ | Xiaopao Chen