1.31 Submission
2.11 Under Review
2.27 Major Revision
3.11 Minor Revision
3.11 Acceptance
3.19 Author's Publishing Agreement
3.20 Proofreading
Thank you for the prompt handling, just promoted to Q3, keep it up

(0) 讚！ | 塔特

I used to recommend a book called Express Polymer Letters to everyone. Now its impact factor has soared and the quality of peer review has also improved

(0) 讚！ | deechue

Journal is great. Very efficient, no dragging on, took around 15 days from submission to acceptance. Journal has high language requirements, requires fluency and high readability, and articles need to have well-handled images. The detailed submission process and timeline are shared as follows:
Submitted on October 16, 2023                With editor
Sent for review on October 22, 2023                Out for Review
Received review comments on October 23, 2023   Revision Required (minor revisions)
Returned with revisions on October 28, 2023    Revised Manuscript Submitted
Accepted on November 1, 2023                   Accept

(30) 讚！ | deechue

Do I need to upload the raw data for this submission? I see in the submission guidelines it says, "Figures and micrographs should be clear and sharp. The originals should be included as well as separate files included on the disk." Does this mean I need to upload the raw data?

(0) 讚！ | fapaper顺利

Hello, do I need to upload the raw data for this?

(0) 讚！ | fapaper顺利

2020.02.11, submission; 2020.03.04, there were 3 reviewers and major revision was required; 2020.03.16, it was submitted after revision; 2020.03.19, accept. I do research on water swelling rubber material. The review speed was fast. The first two reviewers raised 18 suggestions; it was estimated that the last reviewer said there was a problem with the language after a glance. It was quickly accepted after major revision.

(0) 讚！ | 小白SCI

First of all, thank the platform very much for providing the experience, and I also hope to share my experience with everyone for reference. (1) Submission. (2) Sent for review in two or three days. (3) Review comments came back in 2 weeks, recommending a minor revision and a rejection. The editor recommended major revisions that should be done within the limit of three months. (4) Submission after revising for 3 weeks. (5) Three days later, the editor accepted it, under the circumstances that it was not sent to the second reviewer for review. (6) Very lucky to be so smooth.

(1) 讚！ | 吕强

The speed is quickly submitted to accept three weeks~~ The editor is more concerned about the novelty of the article as long as no one has done it~ It can be submitted completely~ The probability of accepting is very large~~

(2) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal homepage http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/lmsa20/current review speed is very fast, a newsletter, from submission to recruitment for a month.It is a mailbox submission, and it is acceptd after minor repairs.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

depressed, the third day of the manuscript is not the "frontier" research tragedy

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

2012-11-9 Submitted2012-11-10 Received2012-12-4 Minor revisions2012-12-5 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Two days after the submission, the editor's reply was received, and the review comments were given in about 20 days: after the minor repair, it can be published.Modify and return as required, edit the response on the third day, return to the proof after editing, and publish it after about half a year. Editing Lyn Roberts is very efficient, people are very good, work is meticulous, and through her modification, I have learned a lot.,give it a like!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

This journal has a fast review speed, and the editors are not very good. Polymer chemistry can be submitted up

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Two days after the submission, the editor reply received, 1 month later to give review comments, a reviewer: published after minor repairs.Editing Lyn Roberts is very efficient, like one!It is recommended to use the foreign mailbox to submit the manuscript, otherwise the other party may not receive the mail!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Two days after the submission, the editor's reply was received, and after 2 months, the review comments were given: after the small change, it can be published.Modify and return as required, edit the response the next day, and publish it in about half a year. Editing Lyn Roberts is very efficient, like one!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

has tried a very watery article, there is no news after the select, and finally it is not. The submission is very informal, can only send mail.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

review for one month, a reviewer, not many editors, very fast speed

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

very unreliable journal, no online submission method, right-click submission.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Submitted to the mailbox, it shows that the transmission was successful, how long does it take to receive a reply to confirm the receipt of the manuscript!Very impatient!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

intends to select for this, seek expert advice!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/lmsa20/current

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I submitted an article, but after two weeks I did receive a conformation. I resubmitted to the editor’s email address, which was given to me by the staff, but I still have not heard anything, although the email was sent successfully.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

recently selectd for a low-level article in the past, and refused to submit a draft one month later.Neither reviewer recognized it.Ugh....The rubbish article could not be published.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Recently submitted an article, there is a reply in a week, as long as a small modification, the response has been accepted after a week of submitment, very fast.But it will take half a year to see the journal.The content of the article is not much, only a few representations are made, and the effect is average.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

recently selectd for an article, some corner data, mail submission, selectd after the editor did not give any confirmation mail, thought it was sinking into the sea, the middle of the editor email asked once,Did not hear back.After more than two months, the review comments suddenly came back, huh, huh.As a journal with an impact factor of 1, even if the content is not innovative, the data is sufficient and the effect is good, it is easy.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名