Is this journal peer-reviewed? Reviewers are invited by email three times a week

(0) 讚！ | 菠萝干abc

Hello, do I also need to write responses for final editing?

(0) 讚！ | keke001

There is a reason why this journal has dropped from Zone 1 to Zone 2. I have been assigned two reviewers who do not understand algorithms. One said my loss function was not marked with units, and the other said they did not understand the meaning of the neural network structure. They also criticized my ideas as not being novel, but failed to provide links to similar articles. One reviewer complained that two charts were not clear when presented together, while the other suggested putting them together for comparison. Well, I wish to be demoted to Zone 3 soon

(0) 讚！ | 天AC星

Hello, may I add you as a friend? I have some questions to ask you. Thank you. My number is 79210 5699 and my email is aite@qq.com

(0) 讚！ | 7771119

Do teachers know how much the plagiarism rate needs to be reduced to in order to check for 19%?

(0) 讚！ | cjbhhh

I didn't notice this, I only saw it when he sent me a message, quite funny hahaha

(0) 讚！ | Sun2001

How are you doing now?

(0) 讚！ | cyttt

How long after being invited by the editor can we proceed to the next stage?

(0) 讚！ | cyttt

How long does it take for the editor to invite to the next stage?

(0) 讚！ | cyttt

After minor revisions, it was submitted for review. One reviewer said thank you for accepting his suggestions, while all other reviewers made no comments. I suspect that maybe only one was actually sent for review, and the remaining editors made the decision

(0) 讚！ | Sun2001

It has been almost a year since the initial review, and there is still no result. Has the review time for this journal become longer?

(0) 讚！ | ~KK~

Hello, have you resubmitted for review after the minor revisions? Or was it the editor's decision?

(1) 讚！ | cjbhhh

I don't remember who I recommended as reviewers, I think I didn't fill it out in the submission system, but I wrote it in the cover letter

(0) 讚！ | Sun2001

Submitted at the end of September 23, major revision in December 23, minor revision in February 24, accepted in early May 24. The direction is manufacturing + artificial intelligence. Four reviewers, some recommended by themselves, all very professional and evenly split, two focused on manufacturing and two on algorithms. One reviewer requested a large amount of citation from a team’s literature, not sure if it was his team, but I only found one highly relevant citation and explained the reason. He did not make things difficult for me and expressed thanks for accepting the advice. The editor did not have much attitude, personally I felt like the reviewers had the final say. The speed seemed to be slower than before, but overall the submission experience was still good

(0) 讚！ | Sun2001

It's been ten months since the first trial. Has anyone encountered this issue before? The interim status time has changed four or five times from what I remember. Save the children

(0) 讚！ | cjbhhh

Hello, do you have journal entries on bearing life prediction?

(0) 讚！ | cdyjiayou

I received an invitation to review for this journal in January, but I was busy going to Lhasa and celebrating Chinese New Year at that time, so I forgot about it. They came back to me for the review after the Chinese New Year, so I promptly reviewed the article in detail. I wonder why this journal's impact factor in the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) has dropped?

(0) 讚！ | JhonRambo

Submitted in September 2023, it was immediately put under review. The status date has changed a few times in between, from November 2023, to December 2023, to January 2023; finally in mid-April, a minor revision was requested and acceptance notification was received. One reviewer provided detailed suggestions for revision before acceptance, while another stated that the writing was good and recommended immediate acceptance. The revised manuscript has now been resubmitted, awaiting further instructions

(0) 讚！ | JhonRambo

Hello! It has been two weeks since returning with editor after major revisions. Is it necessary to send an email to remind them? Also, I would like to ask if the probability of rejection after major revisions in this journal is high?

(0) 讚！ | 陈苹果

3.30 Editor Assigned
4.20 Still Editor Assigned

(0) 讚！ | 天AC星

I have been reviewing the manuscript in the same direction for three months, but it has been almost a year and the first review has not ended. I have reminded them three times, but I only received responses from robots. The status has changed many times, and I don't know what's going on

(0) 讚！ | cjbhhh

No news at all, brother

(0) 讚！ | cjbhhh

After 1 year and 2 months of waiting, I finally received it. Take a look for yourself

(0) 讚！ | 松小七

It has been 20 days since submission and the status is still "Editor Invited". Is it necessary to follow up, as the journal website states that the usual first decision time is 15 days?

(0) 讚！ | swjtu_zyb10

It has been almost a month, but I still haven't gotten my UR. I wonder how long it will take

(0) 讚！ | 激昂的大白月