Two very professional reviewers, both seasoned experts from the United States, conducted a meticulous review of the manuscript. One professional editor provided 7 pages of constructive feedback, greatly improving the quality of the article by adding data and results. It is truly rare to encounter such a professional and responsible reviewer. The revised manuscript has shown significant improvement compared to the original submission. I recommend everyone to pay more attention to this journal and hope that it will continue to improve.

(0) 讚！ | 早起鸟儿

Submitted on April 16, 2023; received reviewer's comments on May 2, minor revisions; revised on May 8; accepted on May 9.

Quite fast! The expertise of the reviewers was high, and they provided great suggestions to enhance the content of the article.

(0) 讚！ | Tommy2003

Post hoc comparison is a test of non-research hypotheses. It is very common in actual research: I have completed the experiment, the hypothesis has been confirmed, but it is still necessary to extend the research, so it is necessary to continue exploring the data to see which direction will produce valuable conclusions. At this point, it is equivalent to testing all possible comparisons (although in reality I cannot exhaust all comparisons, but because there is no specific purpose, all comparisons are potential possibilities). Because comparison does not only refer to the difference in the means of two treatments, linear combinations of multiple treatments are also comparisons

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Choose the post-hoc test method based on the data results obtained

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What type of post-test should I use?

(0) 讚！ | 八坂篷蔚

Why do we need to conduct post-inspections?

(0) 讚！ | 陶宜三岁啦

The results submitted in March 2017 were returned in June, with minor revisions. After the revisions, they were reviewed for another 2 days before finally being accepted. They were quickly made available as open access after acceptance, and the reviewers' comments were very detailed and thoughtful

(0) 讚！ | 五轮博达

Review speed: 1.0 Experience sharing: Submitted in May 2018, received feedback in June with minor revisions. After revising, it was re-reviewed for 2 days and then accepted. The article was quickly made open access. The reviewers were very attentive and asked questions in great detail

(0) 讚！ | 四象惜玉

In March 2017, the result of returning in June, minor repair, and after the repair, it was reviewed for another 2 days. Later, it was received. After accepting it, it was open access, and the reviewer was very serious.The problem is particularly careful.

(0) 讚！ | alin-SH

In May 2018, the result of returning in June, minor repair, and after the repair, it was reviewed for another 2 days. Later, it was received. After receiving it, it was open access, and the reviewer was very serious.The problem is particularly careful.

(0) 讚！ | alin-SH

Anyway, with this bearish appearance, there won't be any changes, as long as it doesn't fall, it will be lucky

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 3.0 Experience sharing: I submitted in February and received the results in June. There was major revision, which took another 3 months for re-review before finally being accepted. I paid for language editing in between and it became open access quickly after acceptance. The quality of the journal is acceptable and the reviewers are very professional. My biggest issue now is that my supervisor thinks all SCI journals are free, so he refuses to reimburse me for the 5200 yuan open access fee

(0) 讚！ | 长安诗岚

From submission to publication was about four months. It was accepted for open access. The level of the journal is ok, and reviewers are serious. The open access fee was 5200 yuan.

(0) 讚！ | swswsw1221@sina.com

It is reported that the editor of the journal has recently been changed, and the review speed is very fast.The reviewer was very careful and many small details were raised.The results of the first trial, Minor, were corrected after two days of repair.

(2) 讚！ | zcq@njau.edu.cn

It is reported that the editor of the journal has recently changed, and the review speed is very fast.The reviewer was very careful and many small details were raised.The results of the first trial, Minor, were corrected after two days of repair.

(2) 讚！ | zcq@njau.edu.cn

Review Speed: 1.0
Experience Sharing: It is reported that the journal recently changed its editor-in-chief, and the review speed has become very fast. The reviewers are very detailed and point out many small details. After minor revisions in the first review, the paper was accepted just two days after resubmission

(0) 讚！ | 易梦小可爱

Review Speed: 1.0 Experience Sharing: It is reported that the journal editor was recently changed, and the review speed was very fast. The reviewers were very meticulous and pointed out many small details. After minor revisions in the first round of review, the paper was accepted within two days

(0) 讚！ | 七濑东菊

The review speed is slow, and the reception is relatively easy. If the manuscript has no echo for a long time, you can ask the editor, so there will be a reply soon

(5) 讚！ | chenchengyu@126.com

Review Speed: 12.0 
Experience Sharing: The review speed is relatively slow, but acceptance is relatively easy. If there is no response for a long time, you can ask the editor and usually get a reply quickly

(0) 讚！ | 太虚康震

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 75.0 Experience sharing: The review process was fast, but the subsequent steps were slow. There was no communication from the editors for nearly six months, but the paper was eventually accepted after 8 months from submission to acceptance

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Why can't I register on the homepage?

(0) 讚！ | 西奥博尔德巴雷特

I feel pretty bad about it and the review speed is also slow, but it is relatively easy to accept

(0) 讚！ | 极乐寻山

personal feeling is very bad, and the review speed is slow, but relatively easy to accept

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Submit to editors for a week and wait for the results

(0) 讚！ | Dylan Eve

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.insectscience.org/

(0) 讚！ | 匿名