First time submitting to SCI, the wait was a bit long, but overall it's good that it got accepted.
2022.2.17 - New submission
2.20 - Editor assigned
2.22 - Reviewers assigned
2.23 - Under review
2.24 - Under review
4.6 - Reviews completed
4.12 - Major revision
4.19 - Revision submitted
4.20 - Editor assigned
5.17 - Reviewer assigned
5.18 - Under review
6.28 - Accepted but incomplete
6.29 - Revision submitted
7.2 - Editor assigned
7.4 - Accepted

(1) 讚！ | Hong_Youth

Should the charts be separated when submitting them?

(0) 讚！ | 承望殿下

If the method is described for the first time, detailed explanations are required. Detailed descriptions also show the rigor and thorough consideration of the research work. However, if the method has been described in a previously published paper, a brief description of the method is sufficient, along with a reference

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Briefly describe the method, and provide references

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How much can a method be abbreviated?

(0) 讚！ | 北国博达

When should the Methods section be described in detail, and when can it be abbreviated?

(0) 讚！ | 北国博达

Anyway, it's just the appearance of this bear, there won't be any changes. As long as it doesn't fall, it's fortunate

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

The first review time was nearly 10 months, and I was asked to revise, mainly to modify the language. The second review was very fast, 30 days, but because I could not find someone to polish the language, the manuscript was rejected.

(0) 讚！ | eed

The first review took nearly 10 months, mainly for major revisions to the language. The second review was quick, only 30 days, but since we didn't have a company to polish the language, it was rejected

(0) 讚！ | Arvin Ann

Trashy magazines, whatever, just submit first and then we can talk

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

The review speed is too slow, almost 3 months, and the message is completely

(0) 讚！ | 匿名