Submitted on the 14th, under review on the 19th, but no email was received to track the status of the paper. It is also unclear how many people the editor has sent it to and whether it has been accepted for review. Has anyone else experienced this situation before?

(0) 讚！ | interlegend

After the major revision on October 8th, two reviewers were invited. One of them completed the review early on, while the other accepted the invitation but has not yet reviewed the manuscript. A few days ago, when checking the manuscript tracking record, the status of the accepted review changed from 2 to 1, with only one review completed. Currently, the manuscript is still under review. The editor has not invited any new reviewers, and is feeling anxious.

(0) 讚！ | zwh1111

Make a note of it, hoping for good luck.
11.19 submitted to journal

(0) 讚！ | Four

8.9 submit
8.16 under
9.9 review complete
9.10 major
9.24 resubmit
9.26 under
10.8 required review complete
10.16 Moderate revision
10.18 resubmit
10.19 under
11.4 accept
11.7 proof
11.12 online

Overall, the speed is very satisfactory, but unfortunately it was slightly slow by three days, missing out on the national award supplement... However, for me who has already found a job, the national award is not useful. Many thanks to the editor for being lenient, and also thank you to the reviewers for their detailed and fair comments. Finally, I wish jhm more success!

(0) 讚！ | 苟冯

Currently, there are 4 reviewers who have agreed to review the manuscript, and 9 others have been invited. The quality of the work may be slightly lacking, so please go easy on the reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | tyytytyt

Selecting an editor is not necessary, as the system or chief editor will assign the most suitable editor for your paper. Out of the five or six submissions from our group, only once was our chosen editor assigned to handle it. If you must choose, take a look at the information of the editors on the editorial board of the journal's homepage and select one in a relevant field.

(0) 讚！ | pku_e

Can you please let me know which editor you have chosen? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | 张小西

Can you please let me know which editor you have chosen? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | 张小西

Can you please let me know which editor you have chosen?

(0) 讚！ | 张小西

Could you please let me know which editor you have chosen? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | 张小西

The revised draft was submitted on October 1st and has not been reviewed yet. It has been almost half a year since June 1st...

(0) 讚！ | maize0001

The changes made on October 24th regarding the investment made on October 21st, we are still facing the same situation. What should we do?

(0) 讚！ | 飞天小松鼠

The manuscript tracking on LetPub can be viewed, but not on WeChat.

(0) 讚！ | haha1111111

WeChat cannot be viewed, but LetPub has a manuscript tracking system that can be accessed.

(0) 讚！ | haha1111111

Please translate the following paragraph into English: 11.9 ur

(0) 讚！ | tyytytyt

The journey has been quite smooth, with the first JHM paper I authored progressing as follows:
- Submitted on 28th August
- Under review on 30th August
- Major revisions requested on 17th September
- Resubmitted on 3rd October
- Request for further revisions on 30th October
- Minor revisions requested on 1st November
- Revised on 5th November
- Accepted on 7th November

(0) 讚！ | vita

The review notification is an automatic email sent by the system. After receiving the review comments, the decision letter will include the editor's signature.

(0) 讚！ | pku_e

Before it was possible, but now it can't be viewed anymore. It only displays 2+, indicating that the journal policy has been adjusted.

(0) 讚！ | pku_e

Where can I see the specific number of submissions for review? The Aisville manuscript tracking shows 2+.

(0) 讚！ | zwh1111

2024.07.12 Submitted
2024.07.18 Under review (Sent to 7, no one accepted)
2024.07.30 Under review (Sent to 11, 2 accepted)
2024.08.30 Major
2024.09.15 Submitted (1 accepted on the same day, 1 accepted few days later)
2024.10.8 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | haha1111111

I want to ask where the editor is from. After submitting for review, the email was sent by the editorial department without a name.

(0) 讚！ | 陶瓷气凝胶

Ecological environment article
2024.8.15, submitted
2024.8.16, we
2024.8.28, received
(Reviewed by foreign editors)
2024.9.25, major (Editor sent many, but only received feedback from three reviewers. It is now difficult to find reviewers. One suggested rejection, while the other two provided revision opportunities. Editor made major revisions)
2024.10.15, re-submitted
2024.10.16, we
2024.10.24, received
2024.10.30, received
2024.11.2, reviewer request changes
2024.11.4, reviewer request changes
2024.11.6, accepted. (Thorough response, approval from reviewers)

(0) 讚！ | 晓涛涛

11.3接受

(0) 讚！ | 叶子0504

In the second submission, I did a small job and didn't expect it to be accepted smoothly. This submission took a little longer than the last one, a total of three and a half months.
First review: submitted 1 day; with editor 1 day; under review 48 days; major revise.
Second review: submitted 1 day; with editor 11 days; under review 15 days; accept.
I hope JHM can continue to develop well!

(0) 讚！ | pku_e

It's been 77 days for me, and still no results.

(0) 讚！ | 过儿虫儿