Thinking about whether to submit a proposal

(0) 讚！ | Grace Clemens

Rejected quickly, initially asked to reduce the word count and resubmit. However, the resubmission was rejected within 3 hours without giving a clear reason, only stating that 70% of submissions will not be sent for external review

(0) 讚！ | Hamiltion MacAdam

I also submitted this magazine. According to my senior brother, it is a well-established top journal in public health. I hope to receive a major revision. How many times did the expert upstairs revise it?

(0) 讚！ | legal

Submission in October, acceptance in February of the following year, with two revisions in between. However, the online publication process is really, really slow. It takes 6-12 weeks to be published.

(6) 讚！ | 苏*小妮

Hello, may I ask how many days will it usually take for the editing process? Mine has been 7 days already

(0) 讚！ | 半荷可爱吗

2 weeks to 3 months

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

It may be because the review process is taking a long time and has not yet been completed

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Why haven't I received any feedback after submitting my application for a month?

(0) 讚！ | 平原文波

How long does it usually take for a journal to review a manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | Oswald Edie

Is it only one month from submission to acceptance?

(0) 讚！ | 努力啊大灵冬

The article was accepted quickly, and it took about one month in total. The comments of review experts were very professional and rigorous.

(0) 讚！ | qiannianshuishou2015

Review Speed: 1.0 Experience Sharing: The article was accepted very quickly, in about a month in total, and the comments from the reviewers were very professional and rigorous

(0) 讚！ | 矢泽素玲

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: A dishonest magazine took one week to assign an article number after submission. They then informed me that the main text exceeded the limit and asked for cuts. How did they not notice this the week before? After resubmitting, the magazine actually changed the date of my initial submission to cover up their inefficiency, and five days later claimed the content did not fit the magazine's focus, rejecting the submission. In short, it is a very slow magazine

(0) 讚！ | Mabel Hewlett

This is a corrupt and crooked publication. Seriously. In short, the journal kept revising the requirements throughout the entire submission/review process. The journal’s editor actually revised the date of my initial submission in order to cover up their inefficient work. I mean, are you kidding me? Plus, the editor said that my manuscript was inconsistent with the main content & objectives of the journal after they sent it out for review. Then they rejected my paper. Do NOT even think about this journal (at least while this editor is handling the papers).

(0) 讚！ | 爱吃水果糖

Stalling and not progressing, but being at this critical point of the journey, it is not easy to push higher up. With a score of over 4 points, it can be considered satisfactory

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

The review speed is quite fast, but the reviewers are a bit harsh

(0) 讚！ | 深渊逸翔

reviewing the speed is very fast, that is, the reviewer is a bit harsh.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: We submitted a paper at the beginning of this year, with four reviewers in the first round of review, including one statistical reviewer. After the first round of revisions, most of the article content was rewritten. In the second round, we received feedback from the remaining two reviewers. These two reviewers had even more comments than in the first round, so we worked diligently to address them. If there were issues that couldn't be resolved, we included them in the limitations, which was a good strategy. The third round of review still involved these two reviewers, one mainly focused on text and formatting changes, while the other still had unresolved issues. We humbly explained our perspective. After the third round of revisions, we anxiously waited for two months before finally receiving acceptance. Overall, it feels like this journal has very strict requirements in terms of design, statistics, and discussion

(0) 讚！ | 平原雯清

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: The official statement is that the direct rejection rate is 55%, which means it is rejected without being sent for external review. If we add in the rejections from external reviewers, the acceptance rate should be even lower!

(0) 讚！ | 千手半寒