I can't believe it, it's been over three months and it's still "Under review". I hope the third party can put in more effort and not reject it.

(0) 讚！ | 长发道人蘓沧浪

Submitted at April 2020, waited aprx 8 months for revision, accepted at April 2021.
Editors are kind but it took  1 year to be accepted and published. Journal is quite slow but you get your acceptance in the end.

(0) 讚！ | bilgetaskin@gmail.com

Submitted in May 2019, and accepted in August 2020. It had been with editor and no reviewers was found. After urging the editors 5 times, it finally was sent for external review in April. We reviewed the review comments in June, and revised and submitted it in July. No second review was conducted, it was with editor for 1 month and then accepted in August. Summary: the processing efficient for the editor is very, very slow, and it won't feel like an external review without with editor for half a year first! If you are anxious, please think carefully before submission. I also submitted an article during the postgraduate period. It took me two and a half years. Who dares to believe it!

(3) 讚！ | 匿名而已

Reviewing is very, very slow. Believe me, and do not submit to it. It was still with editor after a few months...

(1) 讚！ | 姓龚的饭

The manuscript was in application of microbiology. It took 9 months for review, and it was accepted in 20 days after the revision was submitted. It was published online in a week, and I am looking forward to the volume and page numbers!

(2) 讚！ | 阿宝

Two months to return to the review comments overhaul, sent to the second trial for two months to reject the draft.Reason: The question is not answered well and it is inappropriate to publish it in the journal!My overall feeling about the journal: First of all, the reviewer is very unprofessional. From the questions raised, the reviewer has no knowledge of the research methods in the food field.Second, the journal editor is very irresponsible!The reasons for rejection are not sufficient and the author's efforts are not respected!In short, there will be no more attention to Indian journals.

(33) 讚！ | gx1996

It is now a monthly journal and the review period is 1 month.The editor is processing very quickly.

(1) 讚！ | 诗鳌

Nothing to say, 18 months, enough irresponsible!!!!!!!

(9) 讚！ | 123

Garbage journal, extremely irresponsible, do not select!!!Submitted for the past month for review, 6 months for external review, overhaul, return and sent for another two months, minor repair, repaired back for a month, refused, because there are several grammatical errors in the article.Is the editor edited funny?In the rejection letter, I hope that you will be lucky next time.

(19) 讚！ | 331876510@qq.com

is a bit slow, submitted in September, the editor waited for January, double-blind external review, under review for 3 months, intermediate reminder 2 times, February overhaul, only one external review opinionIn March and April, the format was revised twice. At the end of April, the editor-in-chief and decision-making power were very large.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

Slow, submitted in June 16th, minor repair in July 17th, and then in the hands of the editor, reminded many times in the middle, 18 years in April to accept

(0) 讚！ | yb

Magazine's immediate impact factor 1.668, it is estimated that this year is very difficult 2

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

The impact factor of the journal has dropped dramatically. After 3 months of submission, there is an editor. After the draft is pressed twice, the review is completed. After 3 months, the first trial is over, overhaul, and the rejection is rejected one month later.The reviewer who has a question answer feels dissatisfied!

(0) 讚！ | 123@qq.com

The review speed is very slow. Now I have selectd for 13 months or re-examine, and I am submitigating a manuscript....The author who is slow to mind does not select for the journal

(0) 讚！ | 哈哈大王

reviewing the draft is very slow, now has selectd 13In the month of re-examination, I will study the manuscript of one select, and I will study it now....The author who is slow to mind does not select for the journal

(0) 讚！ | 哈哈大王

My manuscript was accepted 18 months after submission. After minor revisions, the manuscript was with the editor for 7 months and then under review for 7 months. The reviewers needed to be reminded three times. I don’t think that I will submit to this journal in the future. Many colleagues who have submitted to this journal have said that they didn’t receive notice for more than a year.

(1) 讚！ | xiao128152@163.com

is not as slow as usual, and will not select for this journal in the future. It took a year to submit the manuscript to the recruitment. No more than 7 reminder letters were written before and after. The efficiency of Indians is really not good.Dare compliment

(4) 讚！ | chenguangjing2015@126.com

Editing the Ganges water to drink more, overhaul twice various slow-fee for nearly a year, did not let the language change, but said the language can not refuse

(0) 讚！ | 煞笔阿三

With editor nearly 5 monthsAfter the reminder, I replied that it was "a bit slow process"Two weeks without moving static

(0) 讚！ | 佚名

This journal is now very slow to review, sent to the external trial after one month, and then almost 10 months or under review.

(0) 讚！ | cheese cake

is very slow, very slow!Submitted in March, no news for 2 months, after the draft is submitted, the trial will be submitted at the end of May. This is almost November, or under review!Silent!

(0) 讚！ | zyj_coconut@163.com

Soon, more than one month in the first trial, technical review after rework, 8 days in the second trial.

(0) 讚！ | 1550178779@qq.com

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.springer.com/food+science/journal/13197

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Indian journal.The review process is consistent with SD.Was invited to review the paper of the journal once.Peer review invites experts who have recently published the same type of papers in food-related journals above 3.0 as reviewers.Pay more attention to the quality of the article content.

(2) 讚！ | 匿名