2024.7.5 submitted to journal
2024.7.7 with editor
2024.7.14 under review
2024.10.3 under review
2024.10.17 required reviews completed
2024.10.19 minor revision for acceptance
2024.10.25 revision submitted
2024.10.27 accept

After submission, tracking from the WeChat public account of Elsevier found that a total of 23 reviewers were sent in three months, only the last two reviewers accepted the review. It took half a month to review and one month to accept. If reviewers were found at the beginning, it would probably be faster. During my PhD, a total of six papers were submitted from the lab and all were rejected. Finally, I published one after graduation. Unfortunately, it is now in the second tier of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, hoping to return to the top tier next year.

(0) 讚！ | 酒酒无憾

I hope to return to district one this year.

(1) 讚！ | JY

Oh no, it's out of the ranking, squeezed out by domestic journals

(0) 讚！ | ExpQin

After going online, it took a little over a month to receive the WOS number

(0) 讚！ | 可乐ii

2023-12-09 Submit to the journal
2023-12-12 With Editor
2023-12-13 Reject

(2) 讚！ | theshy人品好

I would like to ask, how long until I can search for the WOS?

(0) 讚！ | theshy人品好

2023/7/6 submit to the journal
2023/7/11 under review
2023/8/31 major revision
2023/9/17 revise
2023/9/27 under review
2023/10/16 accept
Overall, the process was quite fast, but it took a long time to find reviewers during the first review

(0) 讚！ | 可乐ii

Submitted on May 14th
Revised on June 18th
Accepted on July 4th
Very fast process, very nice

(0) 讚！ | Ke

Submitted on 17th July 2023
Major Revision on 16th August 2023
Returned for modification on 1st September 2023
Minor Revision on 6th September 2023
Returned for modification on 10th September 2023
Accepted on 13th September 2023
Less than two months, quite fast

(0) 讚！ | 努力小柯基qq

2023.4.2 Submitted to Journal
2023.4.5 With Editor
2023.4.9 Under Review
2023.5.14 Required Reviews Completed
2023.5.16 Major Revision and Reconsideration
2023.6.5 With Editor (Revised Submission)
2023.6.7 Under Review
2023.6.23 Required Reviews Completed
2023.6.23 Minor Revision for Acceptance
2023.6.24 With Editor (Revised Submission)
2023.6.28 Accept
2023.6.29 Available online
The editor's efficiency is very high, and I also thank the three reviewers! The first review took about a month, while the second review was faster.

(0) 讚！ | ExpQin

The editing speed is very fast, and the reviewers are very professional. They provided a lot of constructive comments for the first revision, and I have been diligently making modifications for almost a month now. I hope the journal will continue to improve and increase its influence.

(0) 讚！ | 科研小李子

4.6 Submission
4.7 Returned due to formatting issues
4.7 Resubmit after making changes
4.9 Under review
4.23 Major revision
5.21 Revised
5.26 Under review
6.4 Minor revision
6.11 Revised
6.13 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | 科研小李子

Hello everyone, I have a question. When submitting for technical review, are you required to upload a .csv file?
Is it mandatory to upload a .csv file during submission? Do all the data in the article (or which data specifically) need to be uploaded as a .csv file? Should it be one file or multiple files?

(0) 讚！ | dadaxiaoxiao

Hello everyone, I have a question. When submitting for technical review, are you required to upload a .csv file? Is it mandatory to upload a .csv file with all the data in the article or only certain data? Should it be in a single file or multiple files?

(0) 讚！ | dadaxiaoxiao

Hello, I would like to ask, when you submit your manuscript, do you use the journal's designated LaTeX or Word? I don't know how to download this LaTeX template, and Word doesn't have it. The PDF only has one page, and converting it to Word messes up the formatting. Thank you for your help.

(0) 讚！ | 小鲤鱼61

Hello, I would like to ask, when you submit your manuscript, do you use the LaTeX template specified by the journal or do you use Word? I don't know how to download the LaTeX template, and I don't have Word. The PDF only has one page, and when I convert it to Word, the formatting gets messed up. Thank you for your help.

(0) 讚！ | 小鲤鱼61

10.4 Submission
10.7 Peer review
10.13 Under review
11.14 Major revision
11.22 Revised
11.28 Under review
12.20 Minor revision
12.21 Revised
12.21 Accepted

(1) 讚！ | 马小马

2022.1.7 Submission
2022.1.16 External review
2022.2.27 First round of comments
2022.2.28 First round of revisions
2022.3.11 Second round of comments
2022.3.11 Second round of revisions
2022.3.28 Accepted
2022.3.31 online

(3) 讚！ | 小小谭

Hello, I submitted my work in September and haven't received any news until now. May I ask when will there be a result for the first review of my submission?

(0) 讚！ | 油竹

2019.2.25, submission; 2019.2.28, under review; 2019.3.21, the revision was submitted, major revision and reconsideration; 2019.4.8, submitted the revised manuscript; 2019.5.27, major revision and reconsideration; 2019.6.25 submitted the second revised manuscript; 2019.7.25, accept.

(3) 讚！ | 第二次青春

I submitted it on December 28, 2018; the deadline for the major revision and reconsideration was February 6, 2019; I submitted the revision on February 21, 2019; The comments were made on February 28, 2019, minor revision and acceptance was given. I submitted the second revision on March 11, 2019. The second comments of revision came back on March 16, 2019; I submitted the third revision on March 18, 2019; I was accepted on March 19, 2019.

(4) 讚！ | jingwangchen

5.15 select, 5.29 trial, 9.3 still have no letter, wait for the good anxious

(1) 讚！ | A

5月2#SubmissionOn October 6th, return commentsOn October 11th, the revised draft will be submitted again.On October 24th, Required review completedNo new progress has been made so far.Overall feeling, editors and reviewers compare lazy, submission cycle is too long

(0) 讚！ | 2238434307@qq.com

5月2#SubmissionOn October 6th, return commentsOn October 11th, the revised draft will be submitted again.On October 24th, Required review completedNo new progress has been made so far.Overall feeling, editors and reviewers compare lazy, submission cycle is too long

(0) 讚！ | 2238434307@qq.com

1.10 Submission1.20 Submitted for review5.20 Review comments need to be revised and the data to be added6.02 Return to the manuscript8.12 After two months of madness, I finally returned.There is no opinion on the two reviewers, and a reviewer asks to add the supplementary map to the body.I have waited for more than two months for this wonderful ending.Oh, happy and sad.8.13 Submitting revision8.14 ReceivingI feel that the overall progress is very slow, but it is only a matter of time if the article is highly applied.Reviewer is not very serious, I feel sorry for such a long time.Later, when I changed the proof, I saw a lot of problems.Overall, the FE field is considered an authoritative journal and it is worth a try.Maybe when I selectd for the second time, it happened to be in the summer, everyone was lazy.

(0) 讚！ | liusx1990@live.cn