The overall submission process went relatively smoothly, although there were a lot of revisions.

2024.4.25: Submitted PDF
2024.4.29: In contact with editor
2024.4.29: Under review
2024.5.14: Under review
2024.6.08: Major revision (6.29)
2024.6.28: Under review
2024.7.17: Minor revision (7.31)
2024.7.19: With editor
2024.7.20: Under review
2024.8.9: Major revision (8.23+7)
2024.8.30: With editor
2024.9.4: Under review
2024.9.15: Minor revision
2024.9.20: With editor
2024.9.23: Accepted

(0) 讚！ | 欧阳尚韬

The above information was filled in randomly.
The review process is not double-blind, and authors are required to return within 14 days after accepting the review.

(0) 讚！ | 爱吃煎饼

How are things going now? Has it been submitted for review?

(0) 讚！ | 张12

Hello classmates, do we still need double-blind review for submissions now?

(0) 讚！ | 土壤人~

May I ask if double-blind review is still required for submissions? I couldn't find it in the submission guidelines.

(0) 讚！ | 土壤人~

Isn't the deadline for making the first decision ten days? How can it be delayed for so long?

(0) 讚！ | mengdong

How is yours going? Has it been sent for review? Mine has been with the editor for half a month, it's agonizing.

(0) 讚！ | levan

Why has my submission been "with editor" for a month without being sent for review? Has anyone else encountered this situation?

(1) 讚！ | s835074144

Translation: Need

(0) 讚！ | s835074144

Is it sufficient to just make changes to the manuscript during the revision? Do we need a response letter?

(0) 讚！ | Zhu小洋

First submitted to aquaculture, was transferred to the journal and guaranteed a review
Reviewed on 4.27, a total of three reviewers
Review completed on 5.14, major revision required
Uploaded on 6.25, requested a one-week extension due to an additional experiment
Minor revision on 7.12, with only 2 reviewers at this point, requested detailed experimental procedures and an additional schematic diagram, using actual experimental figures
Submitted on 7.16, reviewed by one reviewer on the same day
Although no response was received from this reviewer on WeChat, it was thought to be another long wait
Received an acceptance email on 8.1
In summary, the focus was on experimental methods, the editor seemed familiar with methodology, and the process was not as slow as rumored. The editor was quite efficient, and the three reviewers were prompt.

(2) 讚！ | accept接到手软

The level of the magazine is acceptable. I have submitted articles twice. The first time there were 9 reviewers, most of whom were foreign experts. The reviewers were very rigorous in their approach to the issues. The second time there were 5 reviewers and after making the required modifications, the submission was accepted smoothly. Overall, it is still a good magazine.

(0) 讚！ | 骑着毛驴看文献

I submitted my manuscript over three months ago, and only one reviewer has accepted and completed the review. Does this mean it's going to be rejected?

(1) 讚！ | stdio159

Does anyone know that after the major revision, the editor sent the manuscript back to the three authors of the first round, but one of them did not accept the review. What should be done in this situation? Will they have to resubmit it again?

(0) 讚！ | 大龄灭绝师太

2024-06-17 Rework, 7-1 RRC, 7.3 Accept

Hidden information: Delete the relevant information from the manuscript and upload it to the title page.

(0) 讚！ | 顺顺利利圆圆满满

2024-06-17 for rework, 7-1RRC.

(0) 讚！ | 顺顺利利圆圆满满

Just have to wait! Keep waiting, that's right.

(0) 讚！ | 顺顺利利圆圆满满

6.4 submit
6.5 with editor
6.6 under review
Up to now, a total of 21 reviewers have been invited, but only 2 have accepted. Is it because the research direction is too specific?

(0) 讚！ | 松果

I sent out a reminder in the middle and found more than ten reviewers, but only four agreed to review. In the end, I received three opinions.
20240530 Major Revision

(0) 讚！ | 顺顺利利圆圆满满

How to hide personal information or funds, so that these details cannot be seen in the final result of the "Manuscript Draft"? Thank you

(0) 讚！ | sss12345

After going through two rounds of major revisions, I received a lot of feedback from editors and reviewers. However, once the submission process was entered, it went quickly

(0) 讚！ | 子都uuuuu

Should all personal information be included on the title page, or should a separate document be created containing author and funding information?

(0) 讚！ | ffffff123

Please translate the following passage into English and Japanese, and title them ":" and ":"

(0) 讚！ | 顺顺利利圆圆满满

Do you need to hide it in the manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | ffffff123

How to hide financial information?

(0) 讚！ | ffffff123