Received on 3.27~ Wishing everyone good luck~

(0) 讚！ | 艺天三岁啦

Brother hug

(0) 讚！ | 艺天三岁啦

It has been 55 days since I submitted on 11/20, and it still shows Manuscript Under Review. Is this reasonable, my friends?

(0) 讚！ | 魔都水荷

Submitted on 11.23, it has been 50 days, with the status still showing Manuscript Under Review. Is this normal, friends?

(0) 讚！ | 艺天三岁啦

How about now?

(0) 讚！ | 空明嘉茂

Research focus: Metabolism experience sharing: Submitted on October 19th, looking forward to good news

(0) 讚！ | 天际听南

How did the first trial submission get accepted three months after 24 weeks?? Isn't that contradictory??

(0) 讚！ | 秀颖大叔

Do I need to submit all the raw data and the results of the repeated three experiments?

(0) 讚！ | 小青小哥哥

Do I need to submit all raw data and results of three repeated experiments?

(0) 讚！ | 小青小哥哥

Do I need to submit all original data and results from three repeated experiments?

(0) 讚！ | 小青小哥哥

The corresponding author is the overall responsible person for the project, responsible for the funding, design, writing of articles and quality control of the project. They are responsible for communication with the journal during submission, peer review, and the entire publication process

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

The number of corresponding authors for SCI journal papers is not necessarily limited to one, and there is no fixed standard for how many there can be. This is because different SCI journals have different policies regarding the number of corresponding authors. For SCI journals that only allow one corresponding author, if a paper has multiple corresponding authors, the first corresponding author listed will automatically be selected. For SCI journals that allow two corresponding authors, two corresponding authors can be listed. The same applies to other requirements, meaning the number of corresponding authors listed should comply with the specific regulations of the target SCI journal. The first author of an SCI paper is the person who has made the greatest contribution to the experiment and writing of the paper, and is the one whose signature appears first in the list of authors. However, in collaborative research, it is common to have co-first authors. There is no specific rule for the number of co-first authors, and it is heavily influenced by factors such as the workload and length of the paper, as well as the regulations of the publishing journal and the recognition of the institutions involved. Generally, having 2-4 first authors for an SCI paper is the most common scenario

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What is the corresponding author?

(0) 讚！ | 修然小公主

Can a journal have multiple corresponding authors/first authors?

(0) 讚！ | Darlene Pepys

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 75.0 Research focus: Diabetes Experience sharing: AJP-Endo has a very good reputation in physiology, a well-established journal. Submitted on September 10th, review completed on October 18th, with a major revision opportunity given (20 questions from two reviewers). Revised on November 20th, accepted on November 23rd. The Editor-in-Chief is very friendly, with his own judgment and opinions

(0) 讚！ | 晶燕小公主

I do not accept meta

(0) 讚！ | 深渊卫杰

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Research focus: Weight loss metabolism
Reviewer experience: Very nice editor, thumbs up

(0) 讚！ | Edwiin Judson

Submitted three articles to Conscience Magazine

(0) 讚！ | 姣丽三岁啦

Do you have a submission template?

(0) 讚！ | Karen Flower

Is the first instance really going to take 24 weeks?

(0) 讚！ | 幽香童童

Do I need to provide recommended reviewers for this journal? How many should I provide? Should I include them in the cover letter or fill out a form directly?

(0) 讚！ | 血天翠翠

Do I need to provide recommended reviewers for this journal? How many should I provide? Should it be included in the cover letter or filled out directly on a form?

(0) 讚！ | 血天翠翠

Do I need to provide recommended reviewers for this magazine? How many should I provide, and should I include them in the cover letter or fill them out directly on the form? Thank you!

(0) 讚！ | 血天翠翠

Dear experts who have submitted to this journal, will the status of "under review" be immediately displayed after submitting a manuscript to this journal? I made a mistake in writing the email of one of the corresponding authors when I submitted my manuscript. The editor sent an email asking me to correct it before the status can be updated. I am not sure if "under review" means the manuscript is actually under review or if it is still in the hands of the editor

(0) 讚！ | 小海来了

First round of review takes about four weeks. Made a typo. Popcorn? Popcorn? Popcorn? Published on 2019-02-24: Very good magazine, the editors are very nice and responsible. First round of review takes about 24 weeks for major revisions, second round takes about 3 weeks for minor revisions, third round takes one day for minor revisions, and fourth round takes one day for acceptance. Adding in time for additional experiments, it takes about three and a half months from submission to acceptance

(0) 讚！ | 魔都硕阳