A few suggestions for reference:
1. JFB's requirements are high, especially in terms of language polishing proof, biological welfare, and animal ethics.
2. There will be two rounds of reviewing, with 2-3 reviewers in the first round. Recommended reviewers may be assigned for reviewing (you know what I mean!).
3. The second round of reviewing will have a shorter time frame.
4. An assistant editor will handle your manuscript, and it seems that the editor-in-chief will not be involved.

(0) 讚！ | sky316

It's been almost a month, and it's still received

(0) 讚！ | 通幽端丽

Keywords are often the most frequently used words in a text; Keywords are words that can represent the essence of your paper, making it easier to find and increasing the chances of citation

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

In the medical field, most journals and clinical papers highly recommend the use of MeSH. Using MeSH terms is to help with literature search and increase the weight of publications

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Why select keywords from MeSH?

(0) 讚！ | 深渊兴业

What are the requirements for keyword selection?

(0) 讚！ | 修然小公主

2020.1.17, submitted; 2020.3.9, the comments of the review were received, and major revision was required; 2020.3.18, the revised manuscript was submitted; 2020.5.15, accepted; 2020.5.17 online.

(1) 讚！ | 白衣大虾

Review speed: 2.0
Experience sharing: Submitted on January 17, 2020. Received review comments on March 9, 2020. Major revisions on March 18, 2020. Revised on May 15, 2020. Accepted on May 17, 2020 online

(0) 讚！ | Jessie Hodge

I don't know now, but I used to be able to read it before. However, it should be possible if the scope is large

(0) 讚！ | 小昊沅吖

From below 1.5 points, it is now close to 2 points, which is a good sign. This magazine is worth having

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 12.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 5.0
Experience sharing: This journal is very irresponsible. It took 2 months for submission, 6 months for review, and after the reviewer suggested revisions, the editor rejected the paper citing formatting issues. They also suggested resubmitting through their service company

(0) 讚！ | 高昂小哥哥

Submitted in mid-April, returned for revisions by the end of June, after three rounds of revisions, now awaiting the decision of the editor-in-chief, praying for myself!

(0) 讚！ | 寒阴元春

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: Submitted a manuscript, three months later it was sent for review, and it has been another three months, the status has been under review all this time, it's too slow, more than half a year has passed

(0) 讚！ | 北海思义

Can this journal publish papers on microsatellites? Does anyone know?

(0) 讚！ | 烈焰贞静

Submission success rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: Submitted for three whole months, and was finally rejected. However, receiving the review comments, I couldn't help but feel the huge gap between people. Two experts reviewed very seriously, each comment was very constructive. What moved me the most was that they said my grammar was not good, and they specially changed my entire abstract as an example! They also detailed other grammar and detail errors. 7 pages of review comments. Although it was rejected, both experts and editors said that I could resubmit, with a responsible attitude. If you don't have the mentality of "either hit or miss," you can give it a shot. Hehe, I am currently making changes and preparing to submit to another journal with slightly lower requirements, but I am confident!

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review Speed: 3.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 25.0
Experience Sharing: The review process for this journal is not as fast as expected. I waited for over 3 months for my submission to be reviewed, and the feedback was very critical. One reviewer recommended major revisions while another suggested acceptance, but my submission was ultimately rejected by the editor

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Waited for more than two months, and even sent a reminder in between. Finally, the editor sent a short message saying that the submission did not fit the scope of the journal. It's suggested that unless your work is highly relevant to the journal's requirements, it's better not to submit and waste time

(0) 讚！ | 苍风静涵

After waiting for more than two months, I sent an inquiry. The editorial staff replied with a short paragraph, stating that my article’s content was not within the scope this journal. I recommend that you make sure the article’s content and formatting is in line with requirements of this journal, or else it will be rejected.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

This journal is very efficient. It took one month to be reviewed after submission, and in the second month they asked for five reviewers to be recommended. In the third month, they asked for five more recommendations because the reviewers all declined

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

I've waited for nearly two months, but haven't submitted it for review yet

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

The quality of the content of this journal is average, so I submitted an article about gene function that I thought fit the standards of this journal. After 5 months of review, two reviewers provided feedback. One said it was innovative and raised some questions, while the other mentioned that the results were too basic and the conclusion was weak

(0) 讚！ | 是溪澈吖

After carefully studying the content of the journal, I felt that the quality was average, so I submitted an article on gene function that I considered to be more in line with the standards of the journal. After 5 months of review, two reviewers provided feedback. One said it was innovative and raised several questions, while the other said the results were too basic and the conclusions were weak. In the end, the article was rejected. Therefore, the review process for this journal is not very fast, typically taking around 2-5 months. Additionally, I believe that as a qualified reviewer, one must be able to accurately assess the quality of an article, otherwise it is not appropriate to demand a journal with a score of 1 out of 10 to meet those standards

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 75.0
Experience sharing: This year, the speed feels much faster. Including a 5-day revision period, it took 36 days to be accepted

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 75.0
Sharing of experience: Pretty fast, first review took 29 days, revisions for half a month, acceptance in 5 days

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Can molecular markers be used here?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁