The research content is about fire investigation of lithium batteries, which is a relatively niche area. The reviewers are very professional and their comments are very insightful. The editor is very good and the communication throughout the process is smooth.

Submitted on September 9th;
Received comments on October 4th, originally planned for one month of revision time. Due to additional experiments, I requested a one-month extension;
Returned on November 23rd;
Accepted on December 3rd, taking a total of over 3 months, excluding the time I wasted myself, it took about 2 months.

The handling of this journal is extremely impressive.

(1) 讚！ | weillau

It is a good journal, but the number of articles per year is too small, only 20 to 30. The reviewers are very professional, and the comments are pertinent, which is beneficial to the improvement of the articles, but the impact factor is too low. 2018.3.20, submitted; 2018.5.20, comments were raised by the editor; 2018.6.20, the revised manuscript was submitted; 2018.9.20, major revision was required in the first review (one reviewer); 2018.10.10, the revised manuscript was submitted; 2018.11.15 major revision was required in the second review (changed to two reviewers); 2018.12.10, the revised manuscript was submitted, accepted on the same day; 2019.3, published.

(0) 讚！ | ayanamiyao

Two weeks after submitting, I received comments stating that the model was incorrectly presented and not clearly expressed, and the content was incomplete. The comments made were very helpful for my own development and are very pertinent. I submitted the revision is July and it was accepted in August.

(2) 讚！ | 匿名

My dragging time is a bit long...

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

just got an article, quite fast: 3.1 submission; 4.6 received editors return comments, minor repair; 4.10 to submit amendments; 4.13 reply to accept.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

is inspecting, I don't know how to do this

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

is a good journal in the fire field,

(0) 讚！ | 匿名