Timeline:
April 27, 2024, first submission;
June 19, 2024, three reviewers, two positive, one neutral, rejected;
September 19, 2024, second submission;
November 2, 2024, three reviewers, including two from the previous submission, two acceptances, new reviewer minor revisions;
November 3, 2024, submit revised manuscript;
November 14, 2024, all three reviewers indicate acceptance.

(0) 讚！ | hbzyydx

After revising the submission, although two of the three reviewers had no issues and one suggested minor revisions, the editor still sent it for review...frustrating. The same three reviewers were involved again. The first two reiterated that there were no problems, and the third reviewer confirmed that the necessary revisions had been made. Only then did the editor choose to accept the submission. Teacher Ge still remains cautious, hoping that our relationship has come to an end, and in the future, we must submit our work directly to foreign editors!

(0) 讚！ | hbzyydx

The word count is exceeded... continue writing. So I resubmitted on September 21st, and it was transferred to "with editor" in 4 days (not the same editor as last time, so I don't know if I would have been rejected directly, haha). It showed "Under reviewer" on September 30th, and 7 reviewers were invited, 5 accepted. By October 13th, 5 reviewers had finished reviewing and I was asked to revise (due on November 3rd) (1 reviewer only pointed out a small writing issue, while the other 4 provided 5-7 questions each, and I made some changes to the abstract and figures). The revised manuscript was sent to 5 reviewers on October 25th, and only 4 accepted (probably the other one didn't find any issues). The second round of reviews was completed on November 4th, with one reviewer providing some additional comments (the other reviewers had no more issues, it was more of a personal preference of the reviewer, otherwise the paper might have been accepted at this stage). I made the second revision on November 5th, addressing the comments of this reviewer and resubmitted on November 6th. The reviewer had no more issues by November 10th, and the editor accepted the paper and sent it to production. Elsevier sent the proof on November 11th, and I submitted the final version on November 13th. It was a bumpy road, but the review process of this journal was relatively fast, and I was lucky to have it accepted before my defense.

(0) 讚！ | 面向内啡肽

Originally, the submission was probably on 8.20, there was a little misunderstanding, mainly because when I first submitted it, it was returned for revision due to the issue of repetition rate (35%). After 5 days of revision, I re-uploaded it on (8.26) (around 29%, it was really frustrating to revise so much, this plagiarism check is a bit crazy...), but after I re-uploaded it, it took me 2 more days to continue to reduce the similarity (worried that the previous reduction was not enough, reduced to 21%). At that time, I sent an email wanting to contact the editor to replace the uploaded manuscript (the status was still Submitted to Journal at that time), but there was no response. About 10 days later, the editor approved it and sent it for review (Under Review around 9.6), showing that 5 reviewers were sent, 3 accepted, 1 completed the review. It seemed to be going well, but when I checked on 9.20, it suddenly showed Completed - Withdrawn on 9.17, which left me confused. I checked my email and realized that the previous email requesting a change of manuscript was causing the confusion. It turned out that this email was received by the Elsevier administrator (I sent the email from the magazine submission interface, I don't know how it happened, sigh), and the Elsevier staff kept contacting the magazine editor saying that I wanted to change/withdraw the manuscript, resulting in it being withdrawn halfway through the review process...

(0) 讚！ | 面向内啡肽

Is there any news?

(0) 讚！ | 花莽子

May I ask how the progress is going, and how long will it take with the editor?

(0) 讚！ | He-tcm

Friend, have you made any progress?

(0) 讚！ | 艾力

After resubmission, it was quickly sent for review. It was sent to three reviewers, but only two accepted the review and quickly replied with comments (Reviewer 1: No problem, can be published; Reviewer 2: Meets publishing standards). However, the editor seemed to have some concerns, so it was sent to several more reviewers, and only one accepted the review (Reviewer provided three language-related recommendations). However, the editor sent it for review again, and this time no one accepted the review. The comments were then returned. It took a total of two months from the second submission to receiving the decision email.

(0) 讚！ | hbzyydx

Submitted on 10.26. Currently with editor.

(0) 讚！ | 咩离

Does WB need full membrane?

(0) 讚！ | AABQ

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Emphasized research direction: Experience sharing of traditional Chinese medicine compound: How long does everyone's RRC take?

(0) 讚！ | 书生子皓

Research focus: Overview of signal pathways in traditional Chinese medicine 
Experience sharing: Can anyone advise if a review of signal pathways in traditional Chinese medicine can be submitted to this journal?

(0) 讚！ | 宗室梦槐

Incorrect, submit on August 15th.

(0) 讚！ | 巅66球

9.15 Submission
10.18 Acceptance
The editor is very responsible and serious, and the process is very efficient. The reviewers are also very good, providing helpful suggestions.

(0) 讚！ | 巅66球

Please translate the following paragraph into English:接

(0) 讚！ | 如影语雪

10.8 Submission
10.10 Revision
10.13 Resubmission after revision
10.18 Under Review
11.08 One out of three reviewers rejected, the other two provided revision comments but were rejected.

(0) 讚！ | 闹闹NOW

How are you now?

(0) 讚！ | 书生子皓

Have you had your second review? How long does it take to get the result of the second review? Is there a third review?

(0) 讚！ | Belinda Edmund

Oh my, accepted in just one month.

(0) 讚！ | Bob Crichton

Already accepted, thank you.

(0) 讚！ | 五郎凡珊

Under review for over 6 months.

(0) 讚！ | 书生子皓

The submission was made on August 27th, and on the 30th, it was sent back for a change in botanical name. Due to being too busy, the revision was not made until September 13th, and the revised submission was transferred to his hands on the 14th. It is still "with editor" until now, causing a lot of anxiety.

(0) 讚！ | 可乐瓶儿

Please translate the following paragraph into English: 接接接

"Connect, connect, connect"

(0) 讚！ | 书生子皓

I was also very worried about how things turned out later.

(0) 讚！ | 潜龙盼之

12 days

(0) 讚！ | 潜龙盼之