Garbage publication, review rejectedAn article with a lot of loopholes is actually accepted by this journal

(0) 讚！ | 非

Very fast, 19 days first trial ended, given the overhaul, separated by an eleventh holiday, returned to the revised draft after half a month, received directly after one day.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

I also selectd for more than 20 days, and the status has been under review.Anxious,

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

has selectd for more than 20 days, and the status has not changed. The initial state is under review. I don’t know if I have submitted it for review.Anxious.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The review speed of the journal is relatively fast, more than 70 days in the first trial, and the re-submitment was given after the revision. The review comments were given 10 days after the re-submitment--small repair, accepted after minor repairs,A total of 4 months before and after, I feel that the editor is very responsible, the reviewer is also very nice, personally think that it is still a good English journal, there is one more need to be added, the journal is still very strict on the workload of the research content, I will addA lot of data.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

submitted an article, giving a review opinion for one month and seven days.quickly!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Two and a half months after submitting, the status is still “under review.” I wonder if this speed indicates that the reviewers are hard to find. For a previous submission to Chemosphere (which has been accepted), it was also difficult to find reviewers and delayed the time to half a year.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

2013 The journal was renamed Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts.This is the official description: Important news re: Journal of Environmental Monitoring

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

This journal is faster, submitted at the end of March, and has review opinions in early June. After 1 month of overhaul, JulyAccept, go back and forth for almost 3 months, I feel that this journal needs a certain amount of data before the current Chinese people are more and more articles in the above

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

review is indeed faster, although IF is not high,However, the journal's request for the article is not low, it was directly rejected, but the reviewer gave a lot of revision opinions, very professional and very serious.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Speed ​​is relatively fast compared to other SCI journals. The first-instance opinion is given in about one month. After the modification, the acceptance is faster, and after receiving, the typesetting and online publication are very fast!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I don’t know how to say it, I’ve been reviewing it for a month, and I’m not giving any advice, I’m not within the scope of the journal.Either the editor is irresponsible, or the editor is not level, and even the article is not in the scope of the journal.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal of the Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC).RSC and the American Chemical Society ACS are authoritative in the industry, and their publications should not be low grade.However, this journal has a low impact factor in RSC and has been floating around 2.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

brother selectd for a newsletter in 2010, from submitteding to publication for a total of one month and four days.Two reviewers, received after the revision.Communication class is really fast!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I selectd for one article last year. After reviewing the manuscript for two and a half months, I was rejected. I read a lot of articles in this journal and I have a certain amount of work. It should be a good journal.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal Homepage URL: http://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/journalissues/em

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Editing speed is very fast, submission is exactly one monthAfter submitting the manuscript review draft, the work efficiency is satisfactory in 3 weeks.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

has not been selectd, I don’t know how speed

(0) 讚！ | 匿名