I have been waiting for 12 days for the package, I have urged twice, please reject it soon

(0) 讚！ | liuxingyu123

5/13 With editor，WE haven't moved

(0) 讚！ | neil901

The function of viewing the number of reviewers and invitations is available on the official public account of "Elsevier Research Publishing Services". Just enter the manuscript number and corresponding author to check

(0) 讚！ | 24March

Hello, may I ask what is your current status? It's been over two months and I still haven't received feedback from one of the reviewers

(0) 讚！ | accept

Where can I see the specific number of reviewers invited to review? The link provided by the journal always shows "2+" as the number of reviewers invited, with the time being updated. However, the specific number is not visible. Please let me know, thank you

(0) 讚！ | 科研小花一朵

How are your results now, OP?

(0) 讚！ | Su123Su77

Is it necessary to revise Reject & Resubmit_Major revision needed？How likely is acceptance after revision?

(0) 讚！ | Su123Su77

I invested in early May, and now it is still down. So sad

(0) 讚！ | king321！

The biggest feature of this journal is its slow pace. Many topics take a long time to evaluate, and the with editor time is very long, with 1-2 months being normal. Unless it is something completely relevant, some interesting non-mainstream research, do not consider this journal, it will make you angry. Generally, the faster the review submission, the higher the acceptance rate.

I have published 2 papers personally, about mainstream research that completely matches the editor's preferences, and the speed is okay. That's all I can say

(0) 讚！ | 天火

No progress has been made yet. I'm getting impatient

(0) 讚！ | accept

When submitting the revision make sure to keep the track change function on. Otherwise, the manuscript will be sent back causing delays

(0) 讚！ | Ivyyuan

What is tracking function?

(0) 讚！ | dog

Hello, may I ask if you used track changes when submitting the revised manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | Ivyyuan

Record the submission process, the editor is very efficient, and feedback is usually received on the same day. However, the review process is a bit long.
4.17 submit
4.18 under review
6.1 medium revision
6.13 resubmit
6.13 with editor
6.13 under review

(0) 讚！ | YM97

5.29 Invite 7 experts, 1 accept the review
6.8 Invite 11 experts, 2 accept the review

(0) 讚！ | wwwsanw

5.21 under review, sent two, one reviewer accepted on the same day
5.22 2 accepted, 0 completed
5.29 2 accepted, 1 completed
6.01 review complete
6.01 dip
6.07 accept, one reviewer made three minor formatting suggestions, which the editor accepted directly
The sender is Mirko Di Febbraro, thanks to the editor for not asking me to revise again!
Encountered two soft-hearted reviewers, the issues are very professional, and they haven't run away, just that once the paper reaches the editor, it starts to drag, wishing everyone can Accept!

(0) 讚！ | 戴夫丁

Hello, may I ask if there have been any developments?

(0) 讚！ | kantanna

5.3 submission, 6.10 still with editor

(0) 讚！ | zhiyuan yang

5.6 submit, the next day we, the date also changed in between, now 6.10 still we

(0) 讚！ | zzy

Has anyone had the same experience? Please let me know

(0) 讚！ | xueshu xiaobai

Have you entered the external audit?

(0) 讚！ | whywhywhy11111

What's going on, submitted on May 31st, with editor on June 2nd, the date changed on June 7th but still with editor, is this a prelude to rejection???

(0) 讚！ | xueshu xiaobai

No miracles happened. Reject at 6.8

(0) 讚！ | BESTLUCK

Have you produced any results?

(0) 讚！ | Roure.

Dog: Have you found the results?

(0) 讚！ | Roure.