The submission process is fast, with external review taking one month and the editor's responses to mail also being very prompt. The editor is very responsible, overall it's not bad

(0) 讚！ | 晨曦

This journal is a traditional core SCI journal, with good and responsible editors. The entire submission process is also well organized. The quality of the papers can reach the level of excellent journals or above, so it is recommended to consider it.

(0) 讚！ | swswsw12221

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission success rate: 95.0
Experience sharing: A very good submission experience, the review speed is very fast, the editor-in-chief is very friendly, attentive, and professional

(0) 讚！ | Roberta Walton

You do not have to provide the supplementary material, but you must have compelling reasons to convince the reviewers and editors

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

All questions must be answered one by one, no omissions allowed

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Should we also respond to the reviewers' positive feedback?

(0) 讚！ | 龙鳞孝礼

Do I have to supplement the experiment if the reviewers and journal editors request it?

(0) 讚！ | 上清雨真

My article is mediocre. The review process after submission was quite fast, but the reviewers or editors seemed to be inexperienced or wanted more content, as they even asked me to add a statistical table for variance analysis... The publication process is really slow, it has been delayed for a year. The number of experiments conducted was really limited, even with a slightly higher number, it could have been published in a higher-tier journal. It depends on my own situation.

(0) 讚！ | 灯下黑

The editing is very good, the modifications are very careful, and the email responses are very timely, but the publication cycle is too long, more than a year in total~~~

(0) 讚！ | Cliff Cook

The editor is very good, the revision was very serious, the reply emails were timely. However, the review is quite long.

(0) 讚！ | niu