期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | Journal of Electrocardiology LetPub Score 5.2
50 ratings
Rate
Reputation 6.1 Influence 3.7 Speed 9.7 | ||||||||||||||||
期刊簡稱 | J ELECTROCARDIOL | ||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0022-0736 | ||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1532-8430 | ||||||||||||||||
h-index | 55 | ||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||
自引率 (2023-2024) | 7.70%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||
掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||
官方網站 | http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-electrocardiology/ | ||||||||||||||||
在線稿件提交 | https://www.editorialmanager.com/JECG | ||||||||||||||||
開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||
出版商 | Churchill Livingstone | ||||||||||||||||
主題領域 | 医学 | ||||||||||||||||
出版國/地區 | UNITED STATES | ||||||||||||||||
發行頻率 | 四半期刊行 | ||||||||||||||||
創刊年 | 1968 | ||||||||||||||||
每年文章數 | 151每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||
黃金OA百分比 | 18.42% | ||||||||||||||||
Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q3
| ||||||||||||||||
索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0022-0736%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||
平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: Sort of slow, 4-8 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||
競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: Easy | ||||||||||||||||
參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 |
|
|
首頁 上一頁 1 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
[Journal of Electrocardiology] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
作者: 稻荷化狐 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2024-03-25 15:59:51 評論於 A magazine that I wouldn't even think about investing in if I wasn't in a hurry to use up my mid-year settlement(0) 讚! | 稻荷化狐 |
作者: 稻荷化狐 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2024-03-25 15:58:40 評論於 Utterly irresponsible. Submitted the paper in the first round, only to be rejected instantly based on one reviewer's opinion. The reviewer hastily provided feedback on the last day of the deadline, with a vague and unclear summary. After submitting so many papers in top-tier journals, how could I not know what a detailed and clear summary looks like? Some of the images and tables were clearly presented in the original text, yet he still asked. Asked three very casual questions, and directly rejected the paper. I argued back in anger, and the editor took nearly half a month to reject it again, citing the reason as inadequate English. How could a Native English speaker's revision not be up to standard? This is ridiculous(0) 讚! | 稻荷化狐 |
作者: 东京夜梦 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2023-03-10 22:10:08 評論於 Can I submit bioinformatics analysis?(0) 讚! | 东京夜梦 |
作者: 西行寺雨童 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2022-04-15 13:39:23 評論於 Short communication is the article type for this journal case(0) 讚! | 西行寺雨童 |
作者: 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-12-30 17:48:21 評論於 Differences in expression(0) 讚! | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德 |
作者: 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-12-30 12:05:35 評論於 Draw error bars using ggplot2/excel. In Excel, right-click on the bars and select "Format Data Series" to add error bars to the Y axis(0) 讚! | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德 |
作者: 北国博达 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-12-27 09:55:20 評論於 What should I do if there are no error bars on the column chart?(0) 讚! | 北国博达 |
作者: 魂魄彦露 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-12-26 22:29:02 評論於 A bar chart uses the height of bars to reflect differences in data, which are easily discernible to the naked eye. On the other hand, a line chart is typically used to represent trends, with the horizontal axis typically representing dates. It easily shows the trends in data changes(0) 讚! | 魂魄彦露 |
作者: 西行寺雨童 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-12-24 11:57:53 評論於 Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: I submitted a case, it took a month for the review process, and I received major revisions feedback. The reviewers did not raise any questions about the content of the article, they just asked me to revise the language. After polishing and resubmitting, it was accepted in about three to four days, very smoothly(0) 讚! | 西行寺雨童 |
作者: 西行寺雨童 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2021-07-03 08:58:57 評論於 How long does the review process take?(0) 讚! | 西行寺雨童 |
作者: xu 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2020-01-05 13:58:25 評論於 Two cases were published here one after another. The review speed was relatively fast. For case report, if it has inovation, it would have a big chance of being accepted; If there is an opportunity to revise the manuscript, you should carefully understand the questions raised by reviewers and reply them one by one with reason. (0) 讚! | xu |
作者: Jessie Hodge 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2020-01-03 11:33:14 評論於 Two case reports are published in quick succession; the speed of review is relatively fast. The opportunity for acceptance of case reports is high, especially when the cases are innovative. If there is a chance for revisions, carefully understand the questions raised by reviewers, answer them one by one, and provide well-founded responses(0) 讚! | Jessie Hodge |
首頁 上一頁 1 下一頁 末頁 (頁 |
Contact us