How are things after 10 months? Have you accepted it?

(0) 讚！ | Alice88

Submission on March 9th, minor revisions on April 11th, two reviewers

(0) 讚！ | anan-3

The reviewers are very professional and the editors are very efficient

(1) 讚！ | 顽强拼搏

Magazines always ask so many questions, the reviewers are too professional

(0) 讚！ | Animal ATCC

The reviewers of this magazine are basically very professional, anyway, it's true that this magazine is hard to submit to!

(0) 讚！ | Animal ATCC

The deadline given for the major revision on June 26th is August 6th. If it is submitted on July 15th, how long does it generally take for the major revision to be reviewed? Is there a high chance of rejection after completing the major revision?

(0) 讚！ | 白茶-清欢

"in review" means it has been sent for review.

(0) 讚！ | 莺莺燕燕

Why is it "in review" again after "awaiting editor decision"?

(0) 讚！ | 白茶-清欢

I am eagerly waiting for the news of the 5th of February.

(0) 讚！ | 白茶-清欢

There were two reviewers in the first review process. One provided some very meaningful suggestions, while the other constantly nitpicked and used his lack of understanding as a reason for not comprehending. After the revision, only one external reviewer's opinion remained. They didn't understand the whole text and questioned the data based on not understanding even the simple figures in the article. They either thought it was incorrect or crazily denied it in cases where they misunderstood. What a journal! Encountering an old expert who knows nothing at all. I am planning to send an email to inquire about the identity of the reviewer and avoid submitting articles to them in the future. I really want to curse, not even understanding basic biostatistics! And yet, they are assigned to review articles! What a waste of time!

(0) 讚！ | avsers

After the initial submission, a major revision was made two and a half months later. Two reviewers, who were very professional, raised nearly 100 questions. One month later, the paper was revised again. After a second round of review, which lasted for one and a half months, only one of the previous reviewers had minor comments, while the editor sought a third reviewer who provided a plethora of suggestions. The paper was sent back for revision again one month later, and was accepted the next day. The entire process took six and a half months. This is an esteemed international journal in the dairy industry, with highly professional editors and reviewers. The suggested revisions significantly improved the quality of the article.

(0) 讚！ | 莺莺燕燕

Excuse me, does your journal accept articles on the processing of forage? Is it suitable for submission?

(0) 讚！ | sci小白白72

Hello, I would like to ask if this journal accepts articles on the direction of forage processing and utilization. I would like to submit one.

(0) 讚！ | sci小白白72

Dairy product flavor direction, from submission to acceptance, took 2 months, with 2 reviewers. After major revisions were made, it was directly accepted, which was relatively fast. However, the time to publish was slow, with a wait of over two months.

(0) 讚！ | 如圭如璋

How much does it cost, please?

(0) 讚！ | dujj277226

Submitted on June 3rd, accepted on August 31st, but haven't received any updates for the past two months. I would like to ask how long it usually takes for you to provide the PDF confirmation, how long until it is available online, and how long until the payment is due?

(1) 讚！ | ATCC11842

2021.12.24 Post
2022.01.20 Major revision, three reviewers, no comments from the first two, the third reviewer provided five comments.
2022.01.27 No experiment was added for revision.
2022.02.10 Accepted.
Overall efficiency is quite high.

(5) 讚！ | xinshi

2021 3.4 submitting - Submitted in 2021 on March 4th.
2021 4.21 major revision - Received major revision request on 2021 April 21st.
2021 6.1 submitting - Re-submitted in 2021 on June 1st.
2021 7.7 minor revision - Received minor revision request on 2021 July 7th.
2021 8.3 submitting - Re-submitted in 2021 on August 3rd.
2021 8.16 accept - Accepted on 2021 August 16th.
Two reviewers, very professional, with a total of over 70 questions and suggestions. Top journal in the dairy industry.

(18) 讚！ | NATURE123

The reviewers were basically found after submission. It took about 2 months on average for the first review period, and it needed about one month after major revision. The review speed was relatively slow. Regardless of major revision or minor revision, the revision time is generally 40 days.

(0) 讚！ | 晓爽

This is a top journal in the industry. It is difficult to publish and the acceptance rate is only approximately 25%. Researcher Jiaqi Wang from Institute of Animal Science of CAAS and Xinwei Li from Jilin University are editorial board members of this journal.

(16) 讚！ | jake100

2019.6.30, submission; 2019.8.14, major revision; 2019.9.9, the revision was submitted; 2019.10.20, minor revision; 2019.11.3, accept. It took 4 months from submission to acceptance, and I felt the editor was very efficient. There were 2 reviewers in the first review, one of them read the article carefully and raised 55 comments. Another one may not in the relative field, so he didn’t understand it. He asked 5 questions and let me make further revision, but didn’t mention how to revise it. After three weeks of revision, the article was basically rewritten. I carefully answered the comments of the first reviewer. The reply was more than 5,000 words, and it also provided many supporting data that were not in the article. After the revision was submitted, the first reviewer read the reply carefully and asked to supplement some data to the article. The second reviewer still didn’t quite understand and asked a question. After the minor revision, the article should be sent for review again by the editor, and it was accepted directly. The overall feeling is that it is difficult to publish on this journal. The editor and reviewers were serious and responsible.

(5) 讚！ | tengfei

January 4, 2015April 7, 2015 OverhaulJune 30, 2015 BackAugust 15, 2015 OverhaulOctober 8, 2015 BackNovember 25, 2015December 11, 2015 BackJanuary 3, 2016 Overhaul The reviewer has no comments. The editorial comments given before the editor did not give him a satisfactory answer. The editor re-submitted the overhaul.January 10, 2016 BackJanuary 20, 2016 Overhaul The editor's opinion is still not very good.February 25, 2016 BackMarch 8, 2016 Minor repairs are still editors' opinions. Editors are very persistent.March 16, 2016 BackMarch 20, 2016 finally accepted....After more than a year, the hanging heart finally fell.Overall, the speed of review is moderate, a bit slow, and the review of the journal is very strict, especially the editor's rights are very big but also very professional

(3) 讚！ | 呵呵呵

The review is slow, the reviewer's feedback is all over the place. Very limited number of comments.

(5) 讚！ | Susmittee

Research direction for molecular monitoring of milk and dairy quality, has been submitted 2, one has been accepted, another major revision.Submitted 16/8/22Major revision 16/10/18Major revision submitted 16/10/24Major revision 16/11/7Minor revision submitted 16/11/14Accept 16/11/16

(4) 讚！ | Anonymous