2023.12.04 Submitted
2023.12.05 with editor
2023.12.12 under review
2023.12.21 minor revise, one reviewer, 4 comments, 2 are to add a few device images, 2 are for two spelling errors
2023.12.31 submit revised manuscript to journal
2024.01.02 accept

(1) 讚！ | feirenzai

I just received feedback on the review manuscript. Sister, have you received yours?

(0) 讚！ | 小蔡姬

It has been over a month, and still no sign of any movement. I sent a message to the editor, but no one replied.

(0) 讚！ | 刘晓彦

It has been around 20 days since it was submitted, and it is still with the editor.

(0) 讚！ | 刘晓彦

It has been a month for me too, still with the editor. Have you received any updates on your article recently?

(0) 讚！ | 小蔡姬

The date has changed today to Feb 02, 2023, but the status remains as "With Editor" for a whole month.

(0) 讚！ | xlustb

No news, still with the editor. It should be the paper being edited over there.

(0) 讚！ | xlustb

Hello, I submitted to this journal and wanted to ask if there is any news about my submission. Does "with editor" mean that the paper is with the editorial team or with the reviewers?

(0) 讚！ | 小蔡姬

Submitted on 2023.01.04, with the editor until now on 01.07, there has been no news or movement.

(1) 讚！ | xlustb

The theoretical calculations and experiments on crystal growth were submitted on January 10, 2023. With the editor, it will be reviewed until January 31, 2023. I don't know when there will be an update on its status.

(0) 讚！ | 小蔡姬

Topic on computational calculations.

2022.6.10 With editor
2022.8.10 Under review
2022.9.02 Minor revision, a total of two reviewers, 12 comments, need to add some data but not difficult.
2022.9.06 Submit revised manuscript to journal.
2022.9.11 Accepted.

(0) 讚！ | GajunRyo

Come to fulfill a vow.
Submitted on August 1, 2021, received two review comments on September 14, need to conduct additional experiments and make minor revisions to the content. Revised version was submitted on September 16 and accepted on September 26.
Hope this can serve as a reference for everyone.
Really like this journal and hope its impact factor continues to rise.

(17) 讚！ | slrky

It is about the theoretical calculation of crystal growth. It took exactly one month from submission to acceptance. One reviewer accepted it directly. It’s lucky.

(0) 讚！ | tbh

Submitted in early April, minor revision made in early May, and accepted in mid-May. It was quick.

(0) 讚！ | Danae

Submitted in early August, Under Review for two weeks, I don’t know how the progress is, I am eager to graduate

(2) 讚！ | maxcaijingtao1993@foxmail.com

first submission was learned. It was very fast, and it was sent to the editor in 5 days. The review comments were made in 1 month, and I was greedy, and the draft was dragged.In 3 weeks, I actually changed it for about 3 days and sent it back to the third day of accept.Very happy experience.

(1) 讚！ | tanxiaochuan333@qq.com

20 days have not been sent to review

(0) 讚！ | tantalus

Downstairs colleagues, what is the status of your article now, I selectd for 34 days, or with editor

(1) 讚！ | moonboy

selectd for 18 days, has not been submitted for review, so slow

(2) 讚！ | 孤独的人

2013-07-17 initial date submitted2013-07-19 editor invited2013-07-22 technical check in progress2013-07-26 with editor2013-07-30 under review2013-08-15 revise2013-08-23 revised submitted to journal2013-08

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

previously selectd 3, all acceptd, this journal is an old-fashioned journal of material growth, there are many classic articles, the overall level of the article is good, the amount of data requiredAdequate, the requirements for growth are relatively high, and one of the articles is directly accepted for submission. If the innovation is large, the recruitment is no problem.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

fully demonstrates the influence of Chinese authors. The influence factor of a good journal recognized by foreign counterparts is not high. It is also classified as four districts, mainly cited by other Chinese authors.More, resulting in a relatively low IF.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

selectd on March 17th, found a reviewer on April 5th, and a reviewer on May 4th.On the evening of May 10th, 2013, the editor sent a letter and received it directly.The review time is about 1 month.It took two months from submission to reception, and it was because I was hard to find reviewers.The actual review time is more than three weeks, and it is relatively fast.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名

Review cycle three weeks

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

2.28 submitted to journal3.1 manuscript number assiged3.3 Technical check in progress3.6 with editor3.13 under review......

(0) 讚！ | 匿名