10-18, editor invited
10-22, with editor
10-23, under review
11-03, invited 3 people, 2 accepted and submitted comments 2/2/3, required review complete
11-06, under review, this is under review again.

(0) 讚！ | Jamie0703

10-18, editor invited
10-22, with editor
10-23, Under Review

(0) 讚！ | Jamie0703

Is it under review now?

(0) 讚！ | John china

Record the status:
10-12, submitted
10-15, with editor, assigned manuscript number

(0) 讚！ | Jamie0703

The submission system of Elsevier allows you to track the status of your submission to the Journal of Controlled Release. This email subject for corresponding authors can provide information on the editing process, status of reviewer invitations (how many have been invited, accepted or declined, and how many reviews have been received), all of which will keep you informed about the status of your manuscript.

(0) 讚！ | 缺月疏桐

Around 7.20 submitted; received the results on 9.2, with two minor revisions, returned on 9.10, and it's still in the hands of the editor as of today, 9.28... Not sure if it's because the JCR processing speed has always been slow, or if they are just being cautious and looking for another reviewer. Can any experienced experts provide some insight? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | ajiejiejie

If it is targeted drug delivery, it requires novelty in chemical synthesis, innovation in responsive release, a high demand for clinical disease treatment, and novelty in disease models. Achieving these aspects will lead to rapid acceptance. Otherwise, like my article, it will be slow and difficult to find reviewers.

(1) 讚！ | 缺月疏桐

Record the experience of submitting a paper! The submission to Science Advances was rejected, and the editor recommended submitting to JCR. On May 12, 2024, the paper was submitted to the journal, with the editor assigned on May 20. On May 28, the paper was under review, with 2 reviews completed. 3 review invitations were accepted and 3+ review invitations were sent. This status lasted for one month before the review was completed on June 20. A revision was submitted on July 20 and reviews were completed on August 10, with 1 review invitation accepted and 2 review invitations sent (PS During the major revision, there were 3 reviewers, 1 acceptance, and 2 modifications). On September 14, there was a reminder for some new reviews for COREL-D-24-01810R1 in "Peer review status", and I recommended additional reviewers. The paper was accepted on September 15.

(1) 讚！ | 缺月疏桐

This is the first time submitting an article to JCR, which is said to be the top journal in pharmacy, so I have high expectations.

(1) 讚！ | 缺月疏桐

4.17 submit
4.22 editor invited
4.23 under review
5.2 under review
6.2 under review
6.12 under review
6.22 revise
9.3 accept

(0) 讚！ | Cassatt

Submitted in March, accepted in July, featured article!

(0) 讚！ | plain river

Apr 22, 2024 Submitted to Journal
Apr 24, 2024 With Editor
Apr 25, 2024 Under Review
Apr 30, 2024 Required Reviews Completed 1/4
May 04, 2024 Required Reviews Completed 2/4
May 09, 2024 Required Reviews Completed 3/4
May 14, 2024 Required Reviews Completed 4/4
May 20, 2024 Decision in Process

1st revision
Jul 09, 2024 With Editor
Jul 10, 2024 With Editor
Jul 13, 2024 Accept (Editor accepted directly, no further revisions required)

(0) 讚！ | lec

What is the final result?

(0) 讚！ | 云枫

Have you resolved this issue? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | Yehudi Luke

Hahaha, accept.

(0) 讚！ | 小宇宇

2024-1-9 submitted
2024-1-17 with editor
2024-1-20 under review
2024-2-19 revise
2024-4-12 revise submitted
2024-6-22 accepted

(0) 讚！ | 蛇骨97

May I ask what the status was before "under review"?

(0) 讚！ | Rachel Roy

The content of the submission is new in terms of technical aspects, material construction strategies, and the effects of formulation use. After submission, two of the three reviewers suggested minor revisions, but the third reviewer harshly criticized the manuscript, saying it was all rubbish, and then said, "Using cellulose acetate as a drug carrier, and cellulose acetate cannot degrade, so it cannot be used for oral nanodrugs. The manuscript should be rejected directly." The Korean-American female editor at Stanford University also rejected the manuscript because of this. Malicious reviewers (from the mainland) + ignorant editors have made me lose my desire to argue. The journal circle is deep and unpredictable; I must henceforth be a passerby!

(0) 讚！ | 半π

How did the article turn out in the end?

(0) 讚！ | 豆子

This has already been rejected, there is no need to hold on to any illusions, DIP before the submission has no exceptions

(1) 讚！ | asd3204

Will the decision continue to be in process before under review? Hahaha

(0) 讚！ | Kingsley791

First-time submission with editor, decision in process for 7 days now. Haha, is this the process of rejection or just the state before the reviewer accepts the manuscript? Haha, keep going, good luck

(0) 讚！ | Kingsley791

Basking in happiness will bring you good luck

(0) 讚！ | Kingsley791

Soak up the joy and cheer yourself on!

(0) 讚！ | Kingsley791

Submitted in early February, received the first review result in about four weeks. The revised manuscript was received three weeks after submission. The editorial process was efficient, and the reviewers' comments were very professional

(0) 讚！ | ZNNBB