May I ask what is the resolution of your images, and do the font sizes in tables have to be the same as in the main text? They said my images and tables do not meet the publishing quality of the journal, but I have already set the dpi to 330dpi, which looks clear to me. I am not sure how to adjust the tables. I hope you can provide some guidance. Thank you!

(0) 讚！ | 小唐同学er

2023.08.28 sub
2023.10.21 maj r
2023.11.10 ac
After the rejection of the chemo submission, submitted to JCH, with three reviewers. Overall, the speed was okay, the reviewers' comments were not difficult to address, but the response ended up being several pages long

(0) 讚！ | Lips111

The current journal review efficiency is very high, taking 3 and a half months from submission to acceptance (major revision), including the Christmas and Spring Festival holidays. Otherwise, it should have been even faster. The reviewers' questions are very professional and meticulous.

2022.11.01 Submitted to journal
2022.11.02 Under review
2022.11.14 Required reviews completed
2022.11.22 Required reviews completed
2022.12.11 Major revision
2022.12.29 With editor
2023.01.10 Under review
2023.01.29 Under review
2023.02.06 Required reviews completed
2023.02.14 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | 最后一章

Currently, the efficiency of journal peer review is very high, taking approximately 3 and a half months (with major revisions) from submission to acceptance. This process includes the Christmas and Spring Festival holidays, otherwise it could have been even faster. The reviewers' questions are very professional and thorough.

2022.11.01 Submitted to journal
2022.11.02 Under review
2022.11.14 Required reviews completed
2022.11.22 Required reviews completed
2022.12.11 Major revision
2022.12.29 With editor
2023.01.10 Under review
2023.01.29 Under review
2023.02.06 Required reviews completed
2023.02.14 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | 最后一章

After two weeks of being under review, the required reviews were completed. However, the RRC status has remained unchanged for over a week. Does anyone know the reason behind this?

(0) 讚！ | 最后一章

The speed is extremely slow. Submitted in August 2020, accepted in October 2021. The first review took 8 months, and after major revisions it took another month to revise. The second review took 2 months, and after minor revisions it took 1 month to revise. Finally, it was accepted in just ten days. The key point is that I graduated in June 2021.

(1) 讚！ | 凌水河北

It has been 9 months since the submission, and it has been under review all this time. The only change is occasional updates to the dates. It's been so long that a child could have been born by now, yet the paper has not undergone the first round of review. I wonder what the editor is doing.

(17) 讚！ | 寒江独钓

I submitted the manuscript on May 21, and it was under review on June 9. At that time, I thought this journal was quite fast. Who knows that it has been under review until now? It’s about to be 6 months now... This journal is really unbelievable. Can you make it quick? I’m in an awkward position applying for PhD now and I won’t submit to it again. (If an academic loser like me would still has a chance to submit to a journal... Alas...). If you are in the same level, you’d better submit to Hydrogeology Journal, or spend some money in submitting to Water.

(30) 讚！ | 学术垃圾路人甲

I really don’t know what to say to this journal, but it is really bullying. The processing efficiency of the editor was extremely low. More than 2 months after submission, revision was required in the first review. After the submission of first revision, it was rejected in 2 months. The reason turned out to be that the topic was not suitable or publication. It lasted more than 4 months in total. During the period, this journal updated from Q3 to Q2. I don’t know if it was the reason, which really disgusts me.

(1) 讚！ | Love you 3000

8Submission on the 15th, returning the review comments on October 6th, two reviewers, overhaul, October 27th, and October 31st, the speed is very fast,It is expected to see the journal in January or February of the second year.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

Slow review, fast publication.

(0) 讚！ | happy

Reviewing is too slow.Last year, the first trial took 9 months. After the revision, it was sent to the second trial, and it was reviewed for another five months. It is still under review.How long does it take to judge?Don't select for it later!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

ranks sixth in 60 hydrological journals and is an old name, which is highly recognized in international hydrological counterparts.However, the review period is long, and the total number of papers published each year is controlled at around 200, and the quality is good.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Review is slow, anxious classmates carefully consider ~

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

pollution hydrology, Elsevier subordinate journal, hosted by the Netherlands.Collect articles on groundwater contaminant migration and transformation and groundwater solute transport models.The classic hydrological journal, the quality of the article is ok, and is widely recognized.The review is a bit slow.

(1) 讚！ | 匿名