I was about two weeks into it when the chief editor recommended switching tracks because the direction was not a good fit. However, a new chief editor took over in September, and my experience was no longer relevant.

(0) 讚！ | 快乐打工人

May I ask how long the "received by editor" status will last? I have been waiting for over 20 days and it is still in the "received by editor" status. Can I follow up on my submission?

(0) 讚！ | DOOMDUKE

2024.08.07 提交给期刊
2024.08.07 编辑收到

(0) 讚！ | 快乐打工人

Physics machine learning field top 2 journal, but the review speed is relatively slow, and the requirements for the mathematical part are higher compared to computer journals.

(0) 讚！ | Pierre2021

Hello, may I ask which editor you have chosen?

(0) 讚！ | whuwanji

Submitted on July 28, 2023
Completed the first round of review on October 21, 2023, with major revisions
Revised on February 4, 2024
Completed the second round of review on March 21, 2024
Accepted on April 12, 2024

It took 8 and a half months in total, which is half the time compared to the first submission that took 17 months!!!

(0) 讚！ | 半月痕

2023.5.7 Small revision, major revise
2023.7.23 Careful modification returned
2023.9.6 One accepted, major revise
2023.11.6 Major revision again, too painful
Currently waiting for feedback, hoping for the best, best wishes

(0) 讚！ | leeroket

Just received an article that was accepted for publication. Based on my own experience of submitting articles and the comments in the discussion section, I feel that choosing a reliable editor is very important. When submitting an article, you can choose which editor to assign it to in the system. It is not guaranteed that you will get the editor you choose, but in most cases, the editor you choose will handle your manuscript. Therefore, the speed of handling manuscripts can vary greatly, with the deadline for the first review being around one month. Some editors are more diligent in reminding, so they will send emails to remind you when the deadline is approaching, resulting in a faster review. Some editors are not very strict, so the reviewers do not mind if it takes a bit longer. It's all a matter of luck

(3) 讚！ | AKrauser

Jul 30, 2023 ---- submitted to journal
Aug 11, 2023 ---- Received by Editor
Aug 16, 2023 ---- Under Review
Aug 18, 2023 ---- Under Review second reviewer assigned
Sep 8, 2023 ---- Under Review first reviewer completed
Oct 11, 2023 ---- Reviews Completed
Oct 18, 2023 ---- Reject
Heartache, rejected after two and a half months

(1) 讚！ | lulule

Posted on December 30, 2021, received in May 2023. During the period until June 2022, there was no feedback from the journal regarding finding reviewers and it entered the next round of review. In January 2023, a major revision notice was received, and it was revised in April 2023. I have to say, this journal is really slow. Couldn't they have notified me earlier if they couldn't find reviewers? It made me wait for a long, long time.

(0) 讚！ | 半月痕

Overall, the experience was extremely poor, and the handling of manuscripts was extremely unprofessional. The chief editors were extremely arrogant. One detail: we have been following the work of a certain associate editor, who submitted a manuscript in February 23rd to a certain journal of computational mechanics and it was published in June. The content is in the same narrow field as our work. Whether there is any connection here, I won't speculate. I hope that scholars in our country will continue to strive for more influence internationally!

(0) 讚！ | WowSky

Submitted at the end of November 2022, the system status changed to "invite 2 reviewers, 1 reviewer accepted, 0 submissions" two months later. However, this status persisted for seven months after submission! In the sixth month, I contacted the Journal Manager and communicated for one month, also providing additional recommendations for reviewers. During this time, the J Manager copied the email to the Editor in Chief and a certain associate editor (presumably the handling editor), and I separately sent professional and polite emails to the EiC and the associate editor. However, neither of the two editors responded, and there was no substantial progress in the review status of the paper. After discussing with some scholars and seeing the decline in the impact factor of JCP in 2023, it felt like this might be JCP's style. Therefore, I replied to all, politely stating these facts and our pressure, and requested to withdraw the submission. The J Manager asked how the EiC should proceed. Surprisingly, the EiC quickly replied, saying "this is fine for me" in a very disdainful manner. As a result, the withdrawal was quickly processed.

(5) 讚！ | WowSky

2022.11.06 Submit - Submitted on November 6, 2022.
2023.03.29 Major Revise - Major revision requested on March 29, 2023.
2023.04.17 Minor Revise - Minor revision requested on April 17, 2023.
2023.05.06 Accepted - Accepted on May 6, 2023.

(25) 讚！ | 马达加斯加

2023.1.8 submit
2023.1.23 under review
2023.4.23 review completed
Currently waiting for the review results, hoping for the best. Good luck!

(1) 讚！ | leeroket

After major revisions, I was accepted. This journal has received high evaluations from mentors, so its reputation should be good. However, there might be fewer researchers studying my topic, as the editor kept saying they were looking for reviewers. The first review took nearly two years, but luckily I submitted early, so it didn't delay my graduation and I could wait. Only after issuing an ultimatum did they return the results of the first review. The reviewer's comments were quite good, suggesting major revisions. I carefully revised it for two months and resubmitted it, and the second review directly accepted it.

Both JCP and SISC are included. Perhaps we leaned more towards the engineering direction, and mentors believed that JCP was slightly higher than SISC. The latest ranking not being a top journal is also strange, but based on the ranking of CiCP, I don't really think the Chinese Academy of Sciences' ranking reflects the real situation.

(177) 讚！ | winterfell

2022.5.13 Submission
2022.5.18 Under review
2022.7.15 Review completed
2022.8.25 Major revision
2022.10.21 Resubmitted
2022.12.09 Accepted

(3) 讚！ | leeroket

2022/04/05  Submission
2022/06/29  Major revision
2022/08/19  Submit revised manuscript
2022/09/21  Acceptance
The research topic is CFD grid algorithm, and the review process was quite fast. There were a total of 5 reviewers for the initial review, with three minor revisions accepted, two neutral, and the raised questions were constructive. The review reply was nearly 10,000 words long, but fortunately, it ended with a positive result. Wishing the journal continued success!

(26) 讚！ | xxxxxxsda

01/03/2022 Submitted to Journal
01/05/2022 Editor Invited
01/15/2022 Editor Invited
01/26/2022 Under Review
02/07/2022 Under Review
05/24/2022 Major Revision
06/05/2022 Revision Submitted & With Editor & Received by Editor
06/07/2022 Under Review
07/12/2022 Accept

Translation:
01/03/2022 Submitted to Journal
01/05/2022 Editor Invited
01/15/2022 Editor Invited
01/26/2022 Under Review
02/07/2022 Under Review
05/24/2022 Major Revision
06/05/2022 Revision Submitted & With Editor & Received by Editor
06/07/2022 Under Review
07/12/2022 Accept

(1) 讚！ | 楼船夜雪

2021.10.04 submit
2021.12.21 reject

To be honest, this journal is highly regarded in my mind, but the reviewers and editors I encountered were very unprofessional. Firstly, two out of three reviewers suggested major revisions, and the last one outright rejected it. In just one line of comments, not only did they fail to provide any reasonable grounds for rejection, but they also made mistakes in describing our methodology and research subject. It's completely irrelevant. After I rebutted with the editor, they refused to acknowledge their mistake and even claimed that the rejection was not based on the third reviewer's recommendation. Well, I'm speechless!

(8) 讚！ | Hyman_XJTU

30-Sep.-2021 Submitted to Journal
7-Oct.-2021 Received by Editor
14-Oct.-2021 Under Review
12-Jan.-2022 Reject & Resubmit
21-Feb.-2022 Submitted to Journal
23-Feb.-2022 Received by Editor
7-Mar.-2022 Accepted
2 reviewers, both reviewers asked relevant questions, no negative feedback, mainly considered the Numerical Tests section to be weak, and one reviewer even kindly helped design the Numerical Tests. After revisions, the paper has improved significantly. The resubmitted manuscript is expected to follow the process and format of major revisions and will likely be sent to the same two reviewers. This is the first submission, interdisciplinary, and related to unstructured grid algorithms. It is clear that the reviewers have a deeper understanding of numerical aspects rather than algorithm aspects. Perhaps mathematicians find programming implementation to be trivial, haha. Currently, considering the audience and publication volume, this journal is not difficult to submit to and has good efficiency.

(14) 讚！ | tongtong

Boss... If you want to say he's not competent, you can give another example... Professor Shu Qi Wang is a top-notch computational mathematician...

(0) 讚！ | 度哈哈

May I ask what kind of person you are, and what qualifications do you have to comment on Shu? So what if you have published 100 articles, even if you publish 200 articles, it actually proves the quality and authority of the journal. Are you shamelessly making such grand claims because you have a shallow knowledge, or do you have ulterior motives?

(0) 讚！ | nvnvnv

1. From a historical perspective, JCP has a high quality.
2. The quality has truly declined in recent years. On one hand, the previous peak was too high, and now computational physics is gradually reaching a bottleneck. Only a few directions still have significant room for development, but WENO/DG is not one of them. Thank you. 
The second aspect is that, perhaps influenced by domestic pressure, many teachers from non-double first-class universities have found ways to publish articles. Several small directions can ensure that only those few Chinese reviewers are assigned. You know what I mean... I'm not saying that teachers from non-double first-class universities are incapable, but I just want to say that many papers are not up to standard. It is disrespectful to Professor Shu to publish them in the same journal as his classic contributions.

(0) 讚！ | hahaSIAM_MZ

It's crazy and unchanged. There are many JCPs among the teachers from non-key universities. ... Check out the contribution of Chinese universities to JCP in a year! I'm impressed, even in the field of computational mathematics, there are so many trolls. They even dare to criticize Professor Shu Qiwang. First, take a serious look at Professor Shu's contributions!

(0) 讚！ | 3125

This magazine is a very average magazine in the field of computational mathematics. Many teachers from non-double-first-class universities can easily publish in it. Some Chinese computational mathematicians have published over 100 articles in this magazine, making it a very easy journal to publish in.

(154) 讚！ | IGA