This magazine obviously belongs to the field of computational chemistry, so why was it categorized under general chemistry? It's a strange and unfair treatment, showing a lack of expertise. In the field of computational chemistry, journals like JCC, JCP, and JPC are considered to be on the same level, and the quality of their articles is generally acceptable. It's unfortunate that this magazine has been unfairly criticized.

(0) 讚！ | proszxppp

When I was studying for my PhD in 2015, my first article in SCI was published in this journal. This journal has a very high reputation and is very ambitious, but the reviewers are extremely difficult to deal with. They require a complete derivation and analysis process, as well as verification of source code and raw data, and they also require theoretical innovation. In short, it took nearly 8 months from submission to publication, and I had to provide almost 200 pages of supporting materials and validation data, which gave me a psychological shadow when submitting papers later on. However, it cannot be denied that this well-established journal is indeed rigorous in academic research, and the reviewers have a very high level of expertise. But this journal is also very stubborn, so it is understandable that its influence was surpassed by the American JCTC later on. Overall, seeing this situation still makes me feel quite regretful.

(1) 讚！ | aaronrazor

The translation of the text into English is: "The speed is fast, two reviewers, feedback received three weeks later, minor revisions, and accepted four days after receiving the feedback. Nice."

(57) 讚！ | Chris

The speed is really fast. Two reviewers gave their responses in three weeks, one directly sent revisions for a few terms. After the response, it was accepted in two weeks.

(15) 讚！ | Xp47

I have submitted many articles, but two of the articles were rejected which were carefully revised, and both of them were rejected by Journal of Crohn's and Colitis. So I won't submit to this journal for a long time or in the future anymore.

(16) 讚！ | 无畏

Focus on a thorough analysis of articles, a little longer.

(0) 讚！ | eeguoliangfan

The editor of the super-nice review is also in place. Although one of the reviewers is still not satisfied with the editor or agreed to accept it (The first select of jpc refused pccp refused jcc reception)

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

results returned quickly, almost half a month.From the comments, it should be peers.The question raised was quite professional and sharp. There was no way to refute it and I had to change it.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal Homepage URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1096-987X

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

is better in terms of computational chemistryThe impurities, currently, are more like a very comprehensive systematic article.One month after the first trial, and then another month after the revision, then a small change, accepted after a week.Feeling the speed is still very fast ~

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Originally only published articles on algorithms, there must be a deep algorithm basis and methodological innovation. In recent years, the application of quantum chemistry in practical systems, or the application of quantum chemistry or algorithms to reveal the nature of the actual system has also been popular. 2 reviewers. A bit slow. 12 months.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名